1.4 sec in total
296 ms
996 ms
142 ms
Visit names.gd now to see the best up-to-date Names content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about names.gd
Register your .GD Domain today for US $43/year. The official registrar of the .GD domain.
Visit names.gdWe analyzed Names.gd page load time and found that the first response time was 296 ms and then it took 1.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 20% of websites can load faster.
names.gd performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.5 s
35/100
10%
Value5.7 s
16/100
25%
Value3.7 s
86/100
10%
Value1,100 ms
24/100
30%
Value0.007
100/100
15%
Value6.5 s
59/100
10%
296 ms
348 ms
368 ms
272 ms
274 ms
Our browser made a total of 19 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 68% of them (13 requests) were addressed to the original Names.gd, 11% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com and 11% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (368 ms) belongs to the original domain Names.gd.
Page size can be reduced by 190.4 kB (68%)
281.0 kB
90.6 kB
In fact, the total size of Names.gd main page is 281.0 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 20% of websites need less resources to load. CSS take 130.9 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 5.7 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 1.1 kB, which is 13% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 5.7 kB or 69% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 5.8 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Names needs image optimization as it can save up to 5.8 kB or 24% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 65.8 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 65.8 kB or 56% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 113.2 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Names.gd needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 113.2 kB or 86% of the original size.
We found no issues to fix!
15
15
The browser has sent 15 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Names. According to our analytics all requests are already optimized.
names.gd
296 ms
jquery.js
348 ms
bootstrap.css
368 ms
whmcs.css
272 ms
whmcs.js
274 ms
css
67 ms
ga.js
60 ms
names.gd_logo.png
86 ms
1351464129_paypal.png
83 ms
1351464142_visa.png
85 ms
1351464177_mastercard.png
80 ms
1351464160_american_express.png
89 ms
1351464203_discover.png
149 ms
icon_cart.png
160 ms
verifyimage.php
207 ms
0ihfXUL2emPh0ROJezvraKCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
34 ms
OsJ2DjdpjqFRVUSto6IffKCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
39 ms
__utm.gif
15 ms
collect
55 ms
names.gd accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
names.gd best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript
names.gd SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Names.gd can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Names.gd main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
names.gd
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Names. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: