20.7 sec in total
908 ms
11.9 sec
7.9 sec
Visit nanog.org now to see the best up-to-date NANOG content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about nanog.org
We’re dedicated to the ongoing advancement of an open, secure, and robust Internet, by inspiring, educating, and empowering our community to meet the ever-changing demands of a global network.
Visit nanog.orgWe analyzed Nanog.org page load time and found that the first response time was 908 ms and then it took 19.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is an excellent result, as only a small number of websites can load faster.
nanog.org performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.0 s
51/100
10%
Value14.0 s
0/100
25%
Value7.2 s
30/100
10%
Value2,680 ms
4/100
30%
Value0.017
100/100
15%
Value12.0 s
16/100
10%
908 ms
610 ms
624 ms
1540 ms
586 ms
Our browser made a total of 66 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 79% of them (52 requests) were addressed to the original Nanog.org, 18% (12 requests) were made to Ws.sharethis.com and 3% (2 requests) were made to L.sharethis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (7.4 sec) belongs to the original domain Nanog.org.
Page size can be reduced by 462.9 kB (20%)
2.3 MB
1.8 MB
In fact, the total size of Nanog.org main page is 2.3 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.8 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 44.1 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 44.1 kB or 82% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 137.0 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. NANOG images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 204.5 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 204.5 kB or 63% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 77.2 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Nanog.org needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 77.2 kB or 78% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 34 (53%)
64
30
The browser has sent 64 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of NANOG. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 9 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 19 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
nanog.org
908 ms
system.base.css
610 ms
system.menus.css
624 ms
system.messages.css
1540 ms
system.theme.css
586 ms
ldap_user.css
639 ms
aggregator.css
586 ms
comment.css
839 ms
field.css
638 ms
node.css
638 ms
search.css
691 ms
user.css
769 ms
extlink.css
694 ms
views.css
691 ms
media_wysiwyg.base.css
692 ms
ctools.css
692 ms
ldap_servers.admin.css
802 ms
custom_search.css
800 ms
system-menus.css
713 ms
jquery.js
713 ms
jquery.once.js
749 ms
drupal.js
750 ms
extlink.js
749 ms
custom_search.js
748 ms
buttons.js
991 ms
nanognav.js
748 ms
async-buttons.js
1372 ms
pview
3172 ms
link-right.gif
1924 ms
banner1.jpg
2780 ms
Diamond%20Sponsor%20Design.jpg
2718 ms
Netflix_Logo_Print_FourColorCMYK.jpg
2717 ms
ntt.jpg
2716 ms
platinum%20sponsor%20design.jpg
2718 ms
microsoft.jpg
2717 ms
yahoo_logo_2.png
7437 ms
Gold%20Sponsor%20Design.jpg
3005 ms
google_logo_cmyk.jpg
3005 ms
Linkedin.jpg
3071 ms
VERISIGN-latest-Web.jpg
3006 ms
link-down.gif
2716 ms
nanoglogo-bk.jpg
2961 ms
71Hackathon.jpg
3069 ms
ontheroad_320pxl_for-web.jpg
3070 ms
elections-bk2.jpg
7371 ms
design_meeting_n71_ad.jpg
7433 ms
MemberRegistration.jpg
7031 ms
RegisterNow.jpg
2972 ms
Li.jpg
7050 ms
ML.jpg
3017 ms
twitter.jpg
7031 ms
fb.jpg
7316 ms
flickr.gif
7315 ms
rss_icon.jpg
7316 ms
youtube.jpg
7315 ms
buttons-secure.css
1877 ms
sc
946 ms
p.js
4395 ms
sharethis_16.png
370 ms
linkedin_16.png
434 ms
facebook_16.png
612 ms
twitter_16.png
613 ms
googleplus_16.png
627 ms
tumblr_16.png
696 ms
stumbleupon_16.png
615 ms
email_16.png
616 ms
nanog.org accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
ARIA
These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
ARIA IDs are not unique
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
nanog.org best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript
nanog.org SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Nanog.org can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Nanog.org main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
nanog.org
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of NANOG. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: