Report Summary

  • 16

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    30% of other websites

  • 98

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 94% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    36% of websites

  • 82

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    44% of websites

navcomp.com

Simplify Your Fleet Tracking with Fleet Telematics | Rastrac

Page Load Speed

6.6 sec in total

First Response

105 ms

Resources Loaded

4 sec

Page Rendered

2.5 sec

navcomp.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to navcomp.com homepage info - get ready to check Navcomp best content right away, or after learning these important things about navcomp.com

Learn about Rastrac's comprehensive telematics and vehicle tracking solutions, including fleet tracking software and vehicle tracking devices.

Visit navcomp.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Navcomp.com page load time and found that the first response time was 105 ms and then it took 6.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 80% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

navcomp.com performance score

16

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.8 s

12/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value13.6 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value18.0 s

0/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value22,880 ms

0/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.02

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value34.8 s

0/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

navcomp.com

105 ms

rastrac.com

31 ms

www.rastrac.com

220 ms

jquery-1.7.1.js

57 ms

header.min.css

315 ms

Our browser made a total of 101 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 1% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Navcomp.com, 64% (65 requests) were made to Rastrac.com and 8% (8 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.1 sec) relates to the external source Rastrac.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 537.3 kB (7%)

Content Size

7.8 MB

After Optimization

7.3 MB

In fact, the total size of Navcomp.com main page is 7.8 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 85% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 7.4 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-79%

Potential reduce by 63.2 kB

  • Original 80.3 kB
  • After minification 72.5 kB
  • After compression 17.1 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 63.2 kB or 79% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-6%

Potential reduce by 470.1 kB

  • Original 7.4 MB
  • After minification 7.0 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Navcomp images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 732 B

  • Original 262.9 kB
  • After minification 262.9 kB
  • After compression 262.2 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-15%

Potential reduce by 3.3 kB

  • Original 21.7 kB
  • After minification 21.7 kB
  • After compression 18.4 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Navcomp.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 3.3 kB or 15% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 52 (59%)

Requests Now

88

After Optimization

36

The browser has sent 88 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Navcomp. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 34 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 20 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

navcomp.com accessibility score

98

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

navcomp.com best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

navcomp.com SEO score

82

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Navcomp.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Navcomp.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Navcomp. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: