10 sec in total
2.9 sec
5.2 sec
1.9 sec
Click here to check amazing Navike content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about navike.com
Are you looking for an import export procurement company in Turks & Caicos? Then visit us today to learn how we can help you.
Visit navike.comWe analyzed Navike.com page load time and found that the first response time was 2.9 sec and then it took 7.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 80% of websites can load faster.
navike.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value6.6 s
2/100
10%
Value29.5 s
0/100
25%
Value17.9 s
0/100
10%
Value12,970 ms
0/100
30%
Value0.468
19/100
15%
Value24.2 s
0/100
10%
2853 ms
13 ms
392 ms
382 ms
649 ms
Our browser made a total of 27 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 52% of them (14 requests) were addressed to the original Navike.com, 22% (6 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 7% (2 requests) were made to Connect.facebook.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.9 sec) belongs to the original domain Navike.com.
Page size can be reduced by 831.2 kB (20%)
4.2 MB
3.4 MB
In fact, the total size of Navike.com main page is 4.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 3.2 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 798.6 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 798.6 kB or 88% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 3.8 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Navike images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 5.6 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 5.6 kB or 15% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 23.3 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Navike.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 23.3 kB or 27% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 8 (47%)
17
9
The browser has sent 17 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Navike. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 9 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
navike.com
2853 ms
sdk.js
13 ms
header-cb1f4cb8.min.css
392 ms
header-38a01d30.min.css
382 ms
header-3e511000.min.js
649 ms
st_insights.js
14 ms
header-d1ce1350.min.js
385 ms
sdk.js
189 ms
st_insights.js
372 ms
270 ms
footer-8d4d113b.min.js
726 ms
api.js
724 ms
footer-9cbbeb69.min.js
726 ms
WhiteLogo.png
118 ms
LogoSmall.png
182 ms
Separator.png
183 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmSU5fBBc9.ttf
857 ms
KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxP.ttf
907 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc9.ttf
907 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmWUlfBBc9.ttf
906 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtr6Hw5aX8.ttf
905 ms
fa-solid-900.woff
833 ms
fa-regular-400.woff
796 ms
1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVsEpbCIPrQ.ttf
905 ms
recaptcha__en.js
907 ms
DottedSlider.jpg
454 ms
LogoBigWhite.png
121 ms
navike.com accessibility score
navike.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript
navike.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Navike.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Navike.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
navike.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Navike. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: