Report Summary

  • 55

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    72% of other websites

  • 60

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 26% of websites

  • 50

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    18% of websites

  • 69

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    28% of websites

negative-g.com

Negative-G Amusement Parks and Roller Coasters - We ride until the park kicks us out!

Page Load Speed

2.2 sec in total

First Response

62 ms

Resources Loaded

783 ms

Page Rendered

1.4 sec

negative-g.com screenshot

About Website

Visit negative-g.com now to see the best up-to-date Negative G content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about negative-g.com

Negative-G is about the fun of amusement parks, theme parks and my favorite...roller coasters with photos, trip reports and reviews of over a hundred amusement parks across the United States and Canad...

Visit negative-g.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Negative-g.com page load time and found that the first response time was 62 ms and then it took 2.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 40% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

negative-g.com performance score

55

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.0 s

50/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value5.1 s

24/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value3.9 s

82/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value650 ms

46/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value5.6 s

69/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

negative-g.com

62 ms

newg.css

4 ms

menu.js

17 ms

index-sidebar.jpg

101 ms

downhill_divider.jpg

24 ms

Our browser made a total of 116 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 98% of them (114 requests) were addressed to the original Negative-g.com, 2% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (580 ms) belongs to the original domain Negative-g.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 666.0 kB (12%)

Content Size

5.6 MB

After Optimization

5.0 MB

In fact, the total size of Negative-g.com main page is 5.6 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 80% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 5.4 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-87%

Potential reduce by 73.5 kB

  • Original 84.2 kB
  • After minification 81.9 kB
  • After compression 10.8 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 73.5 kB or 87% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-10%

Potential reduce by 515.7 kB

  • Original 5.4 MB
  • After minification 4.9 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Negative G images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-63%

Potential reduce by 76.2 kB

  • Original 120.1 kB
  • After minification 118.3 kB
  • After compression 43.9 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 76.2 kB or 63% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-67%

Potential reduce by 553 B

  • Original 823 B
  • After minification 542 B
  • After compression 270 B

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Negative-g.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 553 B or 67% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 14 (12%)

Requests Now

115

After Optimization

101

The browser has sent 115 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Negative G. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

negative-g.com accessibility score

60

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Tables and lists

These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

List items (<li>) are not contained within <ul> or <ol> parent elements.

Best Practices

negative-g.com best practices score

50

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

negative-g.com SEO score

69

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    N/A

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Negative-g.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Negative-g.com main page’s claimed encoding is . Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Negative G. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: