11.5 sec in total
4.2 sec
6.8 sec
565 ms
Click here to check amazing Neostream content for United States. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about neostream.com
Visit neostream.comWe analyzed Neostream.com page load time and found that the first response time was 4.2 sec and then it took 7.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 80% of websites can load faster.
neostream.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value7.4 s
1/100
10%
Value10.0 s
0/100
25%
Value10.8 s
6/100
10%
Value570 ms
52/100
30%
Value0.054
98/100
15%
Value11.4 s
19/100
10%
4186 ms
397 ms
796 ms
76 ms
88 ms
Our browser made a total of 26 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 62% of them (16 requests) were addressed to the original Neostream.com, 31% (8 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 8% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (4.2 sec) belongs to the original domain Neostream.com.
Page size can be reduced by 100.9 kB (18%)
571.5 kB
470.6 kB
In fact, the total size of Neostream.com main page is 571.5 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. Only 10% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 441.4 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 15.8 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 2.3 kB, which is 11% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 15.8 kB or 77% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 12.2 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Neostream images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 63.7 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 63.7 kB or 65% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 9.2 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Neostream.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 9.2 kB or 76% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 3 (18%)
17
14
The browser has sent 17 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Neostream. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 4 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
neostream.com
4186 ms
reset.css
397 ms
common.css
796 ms
css
76 ms
css
88 ms
jquery-1.10.2.min.js
1427 ms
common.js
671 ms
bg_body.jpg
1799 ms
logo_web.png
592 ms
bg_nav.png
225 ms
btn_nav_off.png
200 ms
btn_facebook.png
206 ms
btn_kickstar.png
399 ms
btn_utube.png
409 ms
bg_paypal_btn.png
449 ms
bg_paypal_txt.png
468 ms
bg_footer_logo.png
598 ms
img_logos.png
613 ms
0ihfXUL2emPh0ROJezvraKCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
67 ms
OsJ2DjdpjqFRVUSto6IffKCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
87 ms
2Q-AW1e_taO6pHwMXcXW5w.ttf
107 ms
_aijTyevf54tkVDLy-dlnKCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
114 ms
cJZKeOuBrn4kERxqtaUH3aCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
111 ms
DXI1ORHCpsQm3Vp6mXoaTYnF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf
110 ms
MTP_ySUJH_bn48VBG8sNSonF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf
110 ms
k3k702ZOKiLJc3WVjuplzInF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf
103 ms
neostream.com accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
neostream.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
neostream.com SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
KO
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Neostream.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it does not match the claimed Korean language. Our system also found out that Neostream.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
neostream.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Neostream. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: