Tools & Wizards About Us
nidageo.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 87

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    90% of other websites

  • 71

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 37% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    36% of websites

  • 67

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    25% of websites

nidageo.com

NIDAGE 1080P Semi-rigid Wireless Endoscope 2.0 MP HD WiFi 5.5MM Borescope Inspection Camera with Cable for Android and IOS Smartphone, iPhone, Samsung...

Page Load Speed

25 sec in total

First Response

1.2 sec

Resources Loaded

23.5 sec

Page Rendered

276 ms

nidageo.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to nidageo.com homepage info - get ready to check NIDAGE O best content right away, or after learning these important things about nidageo.com

The wireless borescope camera equipped with bendable semi-rigid cable with suitable hardness and softness, which can control the inspection camera’ direction, bend and keep it's shape to access a wide...

Visit nidageo.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Nidageo.com page load time and found that the first response time was 1.2 sec and then it took 23.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is an excellent result, as only a small number of websites can load faster. Unfortunately, there were 3 request timeouts, which can generally increase the web page load time, as the browser stays idle while waiting for website response.

Performance Metrics

nidageo.com performance score

87

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value1.5 s

95/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value1.7 s

99/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value5.5 s

55/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value0 ms

100/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.25

50/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value1.5 s

100/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

nidageo.com

1162 ms

css3.css

1235 ms

jquery.min.js

1544 ms

index.js

1232 ms

MSClass.js

1251 ms

Our browser made a total of 59 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 56% of them (33 requests) were addressed to the original Nidageo.com, 32% (19 requests) were made to Nidageo-x-com.img.addlink.cn and 12% (7 requests) were made to Www-x-nidageo-x-com.img.addlink.cn. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (20.1 sec) relates to the external source Nidageo-x-com.img.addlink.cn.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 149.0 kB (15%)

Content Size

1.0 MB

After Optimization

868.0 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Nidageo.com main page is 1.0 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 20% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 929.0 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-83%

Potential reduce by 23.4 kB

  • Original 28.2 kB
  • After minification 24.8 kB
  • After compression 4.8 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 3.4 kB, which is 12% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 23.4 kB or 83% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-13%

Potential reduce by 124.7 kB

  • Original 929.0 kB
  • After minification 804.4 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, NIDAGE O needs image optimization as it can save up to 124.7 kB or 13% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 100 B

  • Original 46.0 kB
  • After minification 46.0 kB
  • After compression 45.9 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-6%

Potential reduce by 802 B

  • Original 13.7 kB
  • After minification 13.7 kB
  • After compression 12.9 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Nidageo.com has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 8 (29%)

Requests Now

28

After Optimization

20

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 28 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of NIDAGE O. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 4 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

nidageo.com

nidageo.com

1162 ms

css3.css

css3.css

1235 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

1544 ms

index.js

index.js

1232 ms

MSClass.js

MSClass.js

1251 ms

fancybox.css

fancybox.css

979 ms

jquery.fancybox-1.3.1.pack.js

jquery.fancybox-1.3.1.pack.js

989 ms

ico_login.png

ico_login.png

231 ms

ico_reg.png

ico_reg.png

221 ms

20191204113338040.jpg

20191204113338040.jpg

436 ms

20191204112257816.jpg

20191204112257816.jpg

437 ms

20191204112323368.jpg

20191204112323368.jpg

645 ms

20200617121211348.jpg

20200617121211348.jpg

646 ms

20200617114256992.jpg

20200617114256992.jpg

647 ms

20200617105531913.jpg

20200617105531913.jpg

650 ms

20191122122919777.jpg

20191122122919777.jpg

649 ms

20200603114556806.png

20200603114556806.png

651 ms

20180314180720177.jpg

20180314180720177.jpg

858 ms

f1.png

f1.png

859 ms

f2.png

f2.png

860 ms

f3.png

f3.png

864 ms

f4.png

f4.png

864 ms

f5.png

f5.png

865 ms

f6.png

f6.png

1071 ms

email2.png

email2.png

1072 ms

top.png

top.png

1074 ms

logo.png

logo.png

224 ms

mc.png

mc.png

222 ms

form.png

form.png

219 ms

h1.png

h1.png

222 ms

iCoupons.png

iCoupons.png

424 ms

hsplit.png

hsplit.png

417 ms

h2.png

h2.png

403 ms

ico_reg.png

ico_reg.png

3515 ms

form.png

form.png

1224 ms

ico_login.png

ico_login.png

3522 ms

mc.png

mc.png

1241 ms

h1.png

h1.png

1247 ms

logo.png

logo.png

1500 ms

iCoupons.png

iCoupons.png

1040 ms

h2.png

h2.png

1044 ms

20191204113338040.jpg

20191204113338040.jpg

15149 ms

hsplit.png

hsplit.png

1259 ms

20191204112257816.jpg

20191204112257816.jpg

14070 ms

20191204112323368.jpg

20191204112323368.jpg

16267 ms

20200617121211348.jpg

20200617121211348.jpg

12112 ms

20200617114256992.jpg

20200617114256992.jpg

20143 ms

20191122122919777.jpg

20191122122919777.jpg

17353 ms

20200617105531913.jpg

20200617105531913.jpg

18423 ms

20200603114556806.png

20200603114556806.png

20140 ms

20180314180720177.jpg

20180314180720177.jpg

19932 ms

f1.png

f1.png

16313 ms

f2.png

f2.png

16570 ms

f3.png

f3.png

16824 ms

f4.png

f4.png

17078 ms

f5.png

f5.png

17335 ms

f6.png

f6.png

17185 ms

email2.png

email2.png

17387 ms

top.png

top.png

17437 ms

Accessibility Review

nidageo.com accessibility score

71

Accessibility Issues

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Form elements do not have associated labels

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

nidageo.com best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

nidageo.com SEO score

67

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Nidageo.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Nidageo.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

nidageo.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of NIDAGE O. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: