2.3 sec in total
586 ms
1.6 sec
136 ms
Visit nidalia.com now to see the best up-to-date Nidalia content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about nidalia.com
$REGISTRANT1 $REGISTRANT2 $REGISTRANT3
Visit nidalia.comWe analyzed Nidalia.com page load time and found that the first response time was 586 ms and then it took 1.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 30% of websites can load faster.
nidalia.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.3 s
73/100
10%
Value3.7 s
58/100
25%
Value4.5 s
73/100
10%
Value0 ms
100/100
30%
Value0.035
100/100
15%
Value2.3 s
99/100
10%
586 ms
219 ms
5 ms
15 ms
116 ms
Our browser made a total of 25 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 92% of them (23 requests) were addressed to the original Nidalia.com, 8% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (835 ms) belongs to the original domain Nidalia.com.
Page size can be reduced by 70.0 kB (30%)
234.4 kB
164.5 kB
In fact, the total size of Nidalia.com main page is 234.4 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. Only 10% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 211.4 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 11.9 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 4.2 kB, which is 29% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 11.9 kB or 84% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 55.6 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Nidalia needs image optimization as it can save up to 55.6 kB or 26% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 971 B
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 971 B or 14% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 1.4 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Nidalia.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 1.4 kB or 75% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 7 (30%)
23
16
The browser has sent 23 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Nidalia. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests and as a result speed up the page load time.
nidalia.com
586 ms
estilos_menu.css
219 ms
urchin.js
5 ms
__utm.gif
15 ms
fecha.htm
116 ms
ico_gnid_txt.htm
113 ms
calendario.gif
219 ms
logonidalia.gif
225 ms
destellodigital.gif
326 ms
grua.jpg
329 ms
vent_min_max.gif
225 ms
pixel.gif
227 ms
esq.gif
325 ms
promo.jpg
449 ms
rrhh.jpg
554 ms
informacion.gif
432 ms
epilensecom1.gif
432 ms
epilensecom1-1.gif
431 ms
epilensecombj1-1.gif
435 ms
epilensecombj1.gif
533 ms
tira_delegaciones.jpg
751 ms
presentacion.jpg
646 ms
nidaliaspa.jpg
656 ms
nens.jpg
788 ms
actividades.jpg
835 ms
nidalia.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
nidalia.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
nidalia.com SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
ES
N/A
WINDOWS-1252
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Nidalia.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Spanish is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Nidalia.com main page’s claimed encoding is windows-1252. Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.
nidalia.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Nidalia. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: