Report Summary

  • 23

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    42% of other websites

  • 88

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 69% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    56% of websites

  • 93

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    84% of websites

nimbl.com

nimbl - Helping thousands of kids form good money habits

Page Load Speed

6.3 sec in total

First Response

586 ms

Resources Loaded

3.3 sec

Page Rendered

2.4 sec

nimbl.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Nimbl content for United Kingdom. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about nimbl.com

nimbl is designed to teach kids about money in a digital age. Manage pocket money, top up instantly and have fun whilst spending and saving!

Visit nimbl.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Nimbl.com page load time and found that the first response time was 586 ms and then it took 5.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 75% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

nimbl.com performance score

23

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.3 s

18/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value13.9 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value8.3 s

19/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,150 ms

22/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.122

84/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value17.3 s

4/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

nimbl.com

586 ms

gtm.js

234 ms

OtAutoBlock.js

375 ms

otSDKStub.js

413 ms

style.min.css

386 ms

Our browser made a total of 51 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 73% of them (37 requests) were addressed to the original Nimbl.com, 6% (3 requests) were made to Cdn.cookielaw.org and 4% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (946 ms) belongs to the original domain Nimbl.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 79.7 kB (5%)

Content Size

1.5 MB

After Optimization

1.4 MB

In fact, the total size of Nimbl.com main page is 1.5 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.2 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-75%

Potential reduce by 35.3 kB

  • Original 47.2 kB
  • After minification 44.4 kB
  • After compression 11.9 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 35.3 kB or 75% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-2%

Potential reduce by 24.8 kB

  • Original 1.2 MB
  • After minification 1.2 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Nimbl images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 764 B

  • Original 130.1 kB
  • After minification 130.1 kB
  • After compression 129.4 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-23%

Potential reduce by 18.9 kB

  • Original 83.1 kB
  • After minification 83.1 kB
  • After compression 64.3 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Nimbl.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 18.9 kB or 23% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 22 (48%)

Requests Now

46

After Optimization

24

The browser has sent 46 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Nimbl. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 19 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 5 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

nimbl.com accessibility score

88

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

nimbl.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

nimbl.com SEO score

93

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Nimbl.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Nimbl.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Nimbl. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: