2.4 sec in total
224 ms
2 sec
218 ms
Welcome to nips.cc homepage info - get ready to check Nips best content for China right away, or after learning these important things about nips.cc
NIPS Website
Visit nips.ccWe analyzed Nips.cc page load time and found that the first response time was 224 ms and then it took 2.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 40% of websites can load faster.
nips.cc performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.2 s
42/100
10%
Value3.3 s
69/100
25%
Value3.2 s
91/100
10%
Value230 ms
86/100
30%
Value0.024
100/100
15%
Value4.1 s
87/100
10%
224 ms
613 ms
141 ms
289 ms
215 ms
Our browser made a total of 73 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 84% of them (61 requests) were addressed to the original Nips.cc, 4% (3 requests) were made to Maxcdn.bootstrapcdn.com and 4% (3 requests) were made to Platform.twitter.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (763 ms) relates to the external source Media.nips.cc.
Page size can be reduced by 1.8 MB (81%)
2.2 MB
437.7 kB
In fact, the total size of Nips.cc main page is 2.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 1.8 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 53.7 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 13.0 kB, which is 20% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 53.7 kB or 82% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 5.4 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Nips images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 1.5 MB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 1.5 MB or 84% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 250.3 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Nips.cc needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 250.3 kB or 83% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 61 (88%)
69
8
The browser has sent 69 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Nips. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 55 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 8 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
nips.cc
224 ms
nips.cc
613 ms
nips.css
141 ms
bootstrap.min.css
289 ms
offcanvas.css
215 ms
custom.css
215 ms
aloha.css
306 ms
glyphicons.css
218 ms
bootstrap-wizard.css
227 ms
MathJax.js
374 ms
jquery.min.js
105 ms
bootstrap.min.js
49 ms
ajax-csrf-snippet.js
283 ms
font-awesome.min.css
49 ms
bootstrap-wizard.js
287 ms
fastclick.min.js
286 ms
modernizr.js
305 ms
require.js
474 ms
aloha.js
305 ms
NIPS-2015-Poster-Thumbnail.jpg
763 ms
jumbotronBackground-2015.jpg
225 ms
widgets.js
139 ms
glyphicons-halflings-regular.woff
153 ms
sdk.js
321 ms
TeX-AMS-MML_HTMLorMML.js
230 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
11 ms
jquery-1.7.2.js
306 ms
json2.js
148 ms
rangy-core.js
147 ms
class.js
146 ms
lang.js
148 ms
range.js
165 ms
dom.js
242 ms
core.js
206 ms
editable.js
207 ms
console.js
210 ms
markup.js
240 ms
plugin.js
240 ms
selection.js
296 ms
command.js
240 ms
jquery.aloha.js
281 ms
sidebar.js
294 ms
position.js
292 ms
repositorymanager.js
317 ms
repository.js
351 ms
repositoryobjects.js
362 ms
contenthandlermanager.js
362 ms
button.831500944bc3eb7ea5276ccdc3f71d2e.js
32 ms
follow_button.6a78875565a912489e9aef879c881358.en.html
102 ms
rangy-core.js
255 ms
95 ms
pluginmanager.js
137 ms
content-rules.js
152 ms
block-jump.js
191 ms
ephemera.js
204 ms
dom2.js
207 ms
browser.js
207 ms
pubsub-unminified.js
223 ms
copypaste.js
260 ms
state-override.js
276 ms
xd_arbiter.php
267 ms
html.js
271 ms
ecma5shims.js
272 ms
registry.js
278 ms
engine.js
385 ms
arrays.js
269 ms
strings.js
281 ms
jot
83 ms
trees.js
145 ms
maps.js
145 ms
functions.js
155 ms
misc.js
202 ms
observable.js
129 ms
nips.cc accessibility score
ARIA
These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
[role]s are not contained by their required parent element
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
nips.cc best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Page has valid source maps
nips.cc SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Nips.cc can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Nips.cc main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
nips.cc
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Nips. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: