2.9 sec in total
221 ms
2.4 sec
282 ms
Click here to check amazing Node Center content for United States. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about nodecenter.net
Visit nodecenter.netWe analyzed Nodecenter.net page load time and found that the first response time was 221 ms and then it took 2.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 50% of websites can load faster.
nodecenter.net performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value9.4 s
0/100
10%
Value19.7 s
0/100
25%
Value11.4 s
5/100
10%
Value490 ms
59/100
30%
Value0.547
13/100
15%
Value10.6 s
23/100
10%
221 ms
269 ms
499 ms
65 ms
132 ms
Our browser made a total of 59 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 80% of them (47 requests) were addressed to the original Nodecenter.net, 7% (4 requests) were made to F.vimeocdn.com and 5% (3 requests) were made to Ssl.google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (722 ms) belongs to the original domain Nodecenter.net.
Page size can be reduced by 895.5 kB (69%)
1.3 MB
393.8 kB
In fact, the total size of Nodecenter.net main page is 1.3 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 50% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 867.1 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 27.9 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 4.0 kB, which is 12% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 27.9 kB or 80% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 3.2 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Node Center images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 603.9 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 603.9 kB or 70% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 260.5 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Nodecenter.net needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 260.5 kB or 84% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 38 (72%)
53
15
The browser has sent 53 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Node Center. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 27 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 7 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
nodecenter.net
221 ms
nodecenter.net
269 ms
www.nodecenter.net
499 ms
css_pbm0lsQQJ7A7WCCIMgxLho6mI_kBNgznNUWmTWcnfoE.css
65 ms
css_d85MGNVAxhJ_abGIr3Gpsl9uae7SJ_BE7HcpYErGv94.css
132 ms
css_6DpHr7D8-FaHoMsUyrCl-gRKLgjG3_2fOUz5DlGYUFI.css
193 ms
css_zx1UZg3Ech3vwn0MrPgAwhaFeE0yli5x7XeD_-jHxsU.css
256 ms
css_SKoRZAg-y_od2hDZMcdzGojyUrK8ILOJlqnWnUy0rmA.css
198 ms
jquery.js
380 ms
jquery.once.js
198 ms
drupal.js
266 ms
jquery.cookie.js
253 ms
jquery.easing.min.js
253 ms
supersized.3.2.7.min.js
323 ms
supersized.shutter.js
317 ms
slide.js
317 ms
hover-intent.js
319 ms
md.menu.js
323 ms
selectnav.min.js
395 ms
jquery.ui.all.min.js
686 ms
googleanalytics.js
404 ms
modernizr.min.js
398 ms
platon.js
402 ms
jquery.sticky.js
438 ms
nc.js
442 ms
anchor_slide.js
442 ms
sticky_header.js
443 ms
moment.min.js
502 ms
jquery.tooltipster.min.js
501 ms
fullcalendar.min.js
722 ms
mycalendar.js
503 ms
css
65 ms
analytics.js
101 ms
102937027
101 ms
103496093
101 ms
logo-small-header.png
75 ms
logo.png
75 ms
141124-A-Practical-Guide-List_1.jpg
144 ms
140311-Creative-Thinking-List.jpg
73 ms
141124-Exhibition-Design-List.jpg
74 ms
logo-footer-1.png
74 ms
logo-footer-2.png
170 ms
facebook.png
170 ms
youtube.png
171 ms
twitter.png
170 ms
progress.gif
606 ms
141124-Exhibition-Design-Plygnd.jpg
524 ms
140311-Creative-Thinking-Plygnd.jpg
646 ms
141124-A-Practical-Guide-Plygnd.jpg
536 ms
2BB73D_2_0.woff
213 ms
2BB73D_0_0.woff
269 ms
collect
13 ms
player.js
106 ms
player.css
87 ms
ga.js
48 ms
vuid.min.js
98 ms
__utm.gif
35 ms
__utm.gif
25 ms
proxy.html
68 ms
nodecenter.net accessibility score
ARIA
These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
ARIA input fields do not have accessible names
Elements with an ARIA [role] that require children to contain a specific [role] are missing some or all of those required children.
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Internationalization and localization
These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.
Impact
Issue
<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Links do not have a discernible name
nodecenter.net best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript
nodecenter.net SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
N/A
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Nodecenter.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else), while the claimed language is English. Our system also found out that Nodecenter.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
nodecenter.net
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Node Center. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: