Report Summary

  • 65

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    79% of other websites

  • 87

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 67% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    36% of websites

  • 71

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    30% of websites

nonneman.com

Nonneman Communications – Integrated Marketing Communications Agency

Page Load Speed

17.8 sec in total

First Response

6.3 sec

Resources Loaded

11.1 sec

Page Rendered

362 ms

nonneman.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Nonneman content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about nonneman.com

Full-Service Marketing Agency located in the Chicago area integrating branding, marketing and advertising

Visit nonneman.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Nonneman.com page load time and found that the first response time was 6.3 sec and then it took 11.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 90% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

nonneman.com performance score

65

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.8 s

28/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value5.1 s

25/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value7.3 s

29/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value10 ms

100/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.037

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value4.5 s

82/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

nonneman.com

6341 ms

d1b2aa5f015d93469e7286527094c803.css

24 ms

jquery.min.js

49 ms

email-decode.min.js

14 ms

e-202409.js

16 ms

Our browser made a total of 23 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 65% of them (15 requests) were addressed to the original Nonneman.com, 26% (6 requests) were made to I0.wp.com and 4% (1 request) were made to Stats.wp.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (6.3 sec) belongs to the original domain Nonneman.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 30.2 kB (6%)

Content Size

512.1 kB

After Optimization

481.9 kB

In fact, the total size of Nonneman.com main page is 512.1 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 30% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 449.2 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-78%

Potential reduce by 30.1 kB

  • Original 38.5 kB
  • After minification 36.2 kB
  • After compression 8.5 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 30.1 kB or 78% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 58 B

  • Original 449.2 kB
  • After minification 449.2 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Nonneman images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 86 B

  • Original 24.3 kB
  • After minification 24.3 kB
  • After compression 24.3 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 5 (23%)

Requests Now

22

After Optimization

17

The browser has sent 22 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Nonneman. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 6 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

nonneman.com accessibility score

87

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Best Practices

nonneman.com best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

nonneman.com SEO score

71

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Nonneman.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Nonneman.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Nonneman. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: