Tools & Wizards About Us
norfolklive.org screenshot

Report Summary

  • 64

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    78% of other websites

  • 83

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 55% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    36% of websites

  • 91

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    71% of websites

norfolklive.org

Page Load Speed

2.7 sec in total

First Response

352 ms

Resources Loaded

2.1 sec

Page Rendered

334 ms

norfolklive.org screenshot

About Website

Visit norfolklive.org now to see the best up-to-date Norfolklive content for United Kingdom and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about norfolklive.org

This is the only website in the world to have so many web cameras on the Norfolk Broads. Find HD webcams with full control here on NorfolkLive.org

Visit norfolklive.org

Key Findings

We analyzed Norfolklive.org page load time and found that the first response time was 352 ms and then it took 2.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 45% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

norfolklive.org performance score

64

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.0 s

51/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value5.4 s

20/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value3.2 s

92/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value260 ms

83/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value8.0 s

43/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

www.norfolklive.org

352 ms

bootstrap.css

322 ms

default-2012.css

154 ms

prettify.css

157 ms

prettify.js

231 ms

Our browser made a total of 50 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 46% of them (23 requests) were addressed to the original Norfolklive.org, 12% (6 requests) were made to C.betrad.com and 8% (4 requests) were made to Pagead2.googlesyndication.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (532 ms) belongs to the original domain Norfolklive.org.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 665.5 kB (35%)

Content Size

1.9 MB

After Optimization

1.3 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Norfolklive.org main page is 1.9 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 40% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.1 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-75%

Potential reduce by 17.4 kB

  • Original 23.2 kB
  • After minification 19.1 kB
  • After compression 5.7 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 4.1 kB, which is 18% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 17.4 kB or 75% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-3%

Potential reduce by 28.5 kB

  • Original 1.1 MB
  • After minification 1.0 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Norfolklive images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-72%

Potential reduce by 529.1 kB

  • Original 739.3 kB
  • After minification 606.2 kB
  • After compression 210.2 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 529.1 kB or 72% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-85%

Potential reduce by 90.5 kB

  • Original 105.9 kB
  • After minification 87.7 kB
  • After compression 15.4 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Norfolklive.org needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 90.5 kB or 85% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 21 (44%)

Requests Now

48

After Optimization

27

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 48 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Norfolklive. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 16 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

www.norfolklive.org

www.norfolklive.org

352 ms

bootstrap.css

bootstrap.css

322 ms

default-2012.css

default-2012.css

154 ms

prettify.css

prettify.css

157 ms

prettify.js

prettify.js

231 ms

norfolklive.org.js

norfolklive.org.js

250 ms

show_ads.js

show_ads.js

8 ms

jquery.js

jquery.js

532 ms

bootstrap.js

bootstrap.js

375 ms

outbound.js

outbound.js

225 ms

thumbnail.jpg

thumbnail.jpg

411 ms

PayPal_logo_80x35.gif

PayPal_logo_80x35.gif

73 ms

thumbnail.jpg

thumbnail.jpg

316 ms

thumbnail.jpg

thumbnail.jpg

325 ms

thumbnail.jpg

thumbnail.jpg

407 ms

thumbnail.jpg

thumbnail.jpg

315 ms

thumbnail.jpg

thumbnail.jpg

406 ms

norfolk-live-map.jpg

norfolk-live-map.jpg

408 ms

logo.jpg

logo.jpg

323 ms

facebook.png

facebook.png

78 ms

twitter.png

twitter.png

78 ms

barnes-brinkcraft.jpg

barnes-brinkcraft.jpg

78 ms

suffolk-secrets.jpg

suffolk-secrets.jpg

231 ms

broads-tours-v1.jpg

broads-tours-v1.jpg

304 ms

southwold-pier.jpg

southwold-pier.jpg

304 ms

oulton-broad.jpg

oulton-broad.jpg

261 ms

footer_logo_1.png

footer_logo_1.png

302 ms

footer_logo.jpg

footer_logo.jpg

336 ms

ca-pub-4411122760582977.js

ca-pub-4411122760582977.js

120 ms

zrt_lookup.html

zrt_lookup.html

56 ms

show_ads_impl.js

show_ads_impl.js

59 ms

glyphicons-halflings.png

glyphicons-halflings.png

358 ms

futura-condensedmedium-webfont.woff

futura-condensedmedium-webfont.woff

335 ms

ads

ads

261 ms

osd.js

osd.js

5 ms

embed.js

embed.js

180 ms

count.js

count.js

20 ms

0_jFwqgyZG.jpg

0_jFwqgyZG.jpg

197 ms

a.gif

a.gif

52 ms

bcs0

bcs0

57 ms

creative_add_on.js

creative_add_on.js

139 ms

easyXDM.min.js

easyXDM.min.js

90 ms

surly.js

surly.js

26 ms

ba.html

ba.html

12 ms

4.gif

4.gif

9 ms

2532.js

2532.js

4 ms

box_19_top-right.png

box_19_top-right.png

21 ms

ga.js

ga.js

10 ms

ci.png

ci.png

21 ms

__utm.gif

__utm.gif

13 ms

Accessibility Review

norfolklive.org accessibility score

83

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

[aria-*] attributes do not match their roles

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

Best Practices

norfolklive.org best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

norfolklive.org SEO score

91

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    N/A

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Norfolklive.org can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else), while the claimed language is English. Our system also found out that Norfolklive.org main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

norfolklive.org

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Norfolklive. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: