941 ms in total
91 ms
732 ms
118 ms
Click here to check amazing NPMCompare content for United States. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about npmcompare.com
Easily search and compare between npm packages, The ultimate resource for npm package research and discovery.
Visit npmcompare.comWe analyzed Npmcompare.com page load time and found that the first response time was 91 ms and then it took 850 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 15% of websites can load faster.
npmcompare.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.4 s
72/100
10%
Value4.7 s
34/100
25%
Value4.3 s
75/100
10%
Value2,150 ms
6/100
30%
Value0.048
99/100
15%
Value11.0 s
21/100
10%
91 ms
69 ms
70 ms
76 ms
27 ms
Our browser made a total of 30 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 13% of them (4 requests) were addressed to the original Npmcompare.com, 17% (5 requests) were made to Googleads.g.doubleclick.net and 13% (4 requests) were made to Cdnjs.cloudflare.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (217 ms) relates to the external source Connect.facebook.net.
Page size can be reduced by 204.2 kB (44%)
469.4 kB
265.2 kB
In fact, the total size of Npmcompare.com main page is 469.4 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 35% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 426.4 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 11.4 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 11.4 kB or 72% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 172.1 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 172.1 kB or 40% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 20.8 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Npmcompare.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 20.8 kB or 76% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 14 (56%)
25
11
The browser has sent 25 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of NPMCompare. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 12 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 4 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
npmcompare.com
91 ms
css
69 ms
ng-tags-input.min.css
70 ms
font-awesome.min.css
76 ms
style.css
27 ms
angular.min.js
59 ms
ng-tags-input.min.js
100 ms
adsbygoogle.js
61 ms
app.js
49 ms
conversion.js
72 ms
sdk.js
217 ms
widgets.js
98 ms
logo_white.svg
79 ms
analytics.js
123 ms
147 ms
ca-pub-9279742423866363.js
71 ms
zrt_lookup.html
77 ms
show_ads_impl.js
99 ms
cJZKeOuBrn4kERxqtaUH3aCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
70 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
46 ms
js
57 ms
115 ms
pla
19 ms
collect
61 ms
ads
205 ms
osd.js
32 ms
collect
48 ms
ads
187 ms
64 ms
0sTQzbapM8j.js
78 ms
npmcompare.com accessibility score
ARIA
These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
[aria-*] attributes do not match their roles
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title
Internationalization and localization
These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.
Impact
Issue
<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute
npmcompare.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Page has valid source maps
npmcompare.com SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
N/A
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Npmcompare.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Npmcompare.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
npmcompare.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of NPMCompare. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: