1.8 sec in total
23 ms
1.3 sec
554 ms
Click here to check amazing Ceaccp Oxfordjournals content for United States. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about ceaccp.oxfordjournals.org
Visit ceaccp.oxfordjournals.orgWe analyzed Ceaccp.oxfordjournals.org page load time and found that the first response time was 23 ms and then it took 1.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 35% of websites can load faster.
ceaccp.oxfordjournals.org performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value1.4 s
97/100
10%
Value7.3 s
5/100
25%
Value6.5 s
39/100
10%
Value1,490 ms
14/100
30%
Value0.485
18/100
15%
Value14.9 s
8/100
10%
23 ms
514 ms
68 ms
82 ms
76 ms
Our browser made a total of 70 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 1% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Ceaccp.oxfordjournals.org, 50% (35 requests) were made to Oup.silverchair-cdn.com and 13% (9 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (514 ms) relates to the external source Academic.oup.com.
Page size can be reduced by 1.0 MB (36%)
2.9 MB
1.8 MB
In fact, the total size of Ceaccp.oxfordjournals.org main page is 2.9 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 80% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 1.6 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 72.0 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 12.9 kB, which is 15% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 72.0 kB or 82% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 149.9 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Ceaccp Oxfordjournals images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 355.9 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 355.9 kB or 64% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 461.3 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Ceaccp.oxfordjournals.org needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 461.3 kB or 81% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 21 (36%)
58
37
The browser has sent 58 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Ceaccp Oxfordjournals. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 16 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 7 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
ceaccp.oxfordjournals.org
23 ms
bjaed
514 ms
css
68 ms
globalCSS
82 ms
cookiePolicyCSS
76 ms
global.css
77 ms
Site248866972.css
99 ms
jquery-1.8.3.min.js
103 ms
gpt.js
69 ms
widgets.js
53 ms
footerJS
139 ms
OupCookiePolicyJS
99 ms
MathJax.js
58 ms
ntpagetag.js
74 ms
analytics.js
207 ms
bjaed_feature_panel.jpg
193 ms
oxford-academic-logo.svg
247 ms
bjaed_title-1181164227.svg
246 ms
bjaed_h1979837110.svg
417 ms
m_bjaed_17_9cover.png
308 ms
RCoA25_homepage.jpg
247 ms
podcast.jpg
245 ms
firework_panel.jpg
268 ms
notebook.jpg
266 ms
BJAED_April_podcast.jpg
266 ms
Podcast_March17.jpg
268 ms
FEb17.jpg
306 ms
BJA_infographic_webimage.jpg
328 ms
BJA_App_Narnia.jpg
328 ms
BJA_needle.jpg
375 ms
affiliatesNEW.jpg
377 ms
email-alerts.jpg
328 ms
recommend.jpg
415 ms
bja.gif
397 ms
painmedicine.gif
472 ms
bjaed_f1-1809848475.svg
395 ms
bjaed_f2-2133274133.svg
455 ms
bjaed_f31302405637.png
453 ms
oup-logo.svg
453 ms
TeX-AMS-MML_HTMLorMML.js
107 ms
ntpagetag.gif
104 ms
oupcookiepolicy_fancybox-x-9f8e00974d7ce052976d20afa799d603b990ba18.png
320 ms
oupcookiepolicy_fancybox-bbf3f5bb2dbcf93dacba74e97f6f360e8e269dbb.png
331 ms
oupcookiepolicy_fancybox-y-0bf85f77994110aaa297a14f21855fa14b0b20d3.png
333 ms
blank-2daeaa8b5f19f0bc209d976c02bd6acb51b00b0a.gif
332 ms
pubads_impl_147.js
175 ms
timeline.bc7ee675e57cb01f4d1e255156414e73.js
19 ms
ODelI1aHBYDBqgeIAH2zlNzbP97U9sKh0jjxbPbfOKg.ttf
135 ms
toadOcfmlt9b38dHJxOBGLsbIrGiHa6JIepkyt5c0A0.ttf
136 ms
icomoon-10c8cce3e34f3a0fe0d722e3ee322184b824f902.ttf
313 ms
RFda8w1V0eDZheqfcyQ4EInF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf
206 ms
ZvcMqxEwPfh2qDWBPxn6ngV_pQ1T3xN3K1c3sB361us.ttf
223 ms
ZvcMqxEwPfh2qDWBPxn6nn06qf9KHRHwsVx7iw5MXmY.ttf
224 ms
M2Jd71oPJhLKp0zdtTvoM0DauxaEVho0aInXGvhmB4k.ttf
224 ms
fpTVHK8qsXbIeTHTrnQH6Edtd7Dq2ZflsctMEexj2lw.ttf
205 ms
So5lHxHT37p2SS4-t60SlCtfYakCkPqOMDce0h_3gD8.ttf
206 ms
EYh7Vl4ywhowqULgRdYwICxQL91WRy8t8mPvAX_dIgA.ttf
223 ms
syndication
276 ms
727525452181458945
318 ms
ads
87 ms
container.html
114 ms
m_window_focus_non_hydra.js
7 ms
osd_listener.js
19 ms
osd.js
59 ms
14148279053921565156
54 ms
681040423111010881
34 ms
IJYKRwaO
57 ms
timeline.b6ca5fbe9fc709c1f1b8c6e02c82d896.light.ltr.css
31 ms
timeline.b6ca5fbe9fc709c1f1b8c6e02c82d896.light.ltr.css
41 ms
dRiT0Qw4_normal.jpg
16 ms
ceaccp.oxfordjournals.org accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
ceaccp.oxfordjournals.org SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
N/A
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Ceaccp.oxfordjournals.org can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else), while the claimed language is English. Our system also found out that Ceaccp.oxfordjournals.org main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
ceaccp.oxfordjournals.org
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Ceaccp Oxfordjournals. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: