4.3 sec in total
51 ms
3.5 sec
732 ms
Welcome to obeliscosmetics.net homepage info - get ready to check Obeliscosmetics best content right away, or after learning these important things about obeliscosmetics.net
Explore our representation services for manufacturers exporting medical devices, in-vitro diagnostics, cosmetics, other products
Visit obeliscosmetics.netWe analyzed Obeliscosmetics.net page load time and found that the first response time was 51 ms and then it took 4.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 65% of websites can load faster.
obeliscosmetics.net performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.6 s
13/100
10%
Value17.7 s
0/100
25%
Value16.9 s
0/100
10%
Value2,400 ms
5/100
30%
Value0.002
100/100
15%
Value21.6 s
1/100
10%
51 ms
175 ms
56 ms
506 ms
537 ms
Our browser made a total of 98 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 1% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Obeliscosmetics.net, 57% (56 requests) were made to Obelis.net and 6% (6 requests) were made to Use.fontawesome.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.1 sec) relates to the external source Obelis.net.
Page size can be reduced by 327.2 kB (12%)
2.7 MB
2.4 MB
In fact, the total size of Obeliscosmetics.net main page is 2.7 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 85% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 1.5 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 191.3 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 191.3 kB or 83% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 21 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obeliscosmetics images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 132.3 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 132.3 kB or 17% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 3.6 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Obeliscosmetics.net has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 74 (88%)
84
10
The browser has sent 84 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Obeliscosmetics. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 47 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 23 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
obeliscosmetics.net
51 ms
www.obelis.net
175 ms
all.min.css
56 ms
v4-shims.min.css
506 ms
cnss.css
537 ms
style.min.css
602 ms
mediaelementplayer-legacy.min.css
104 ms
wp-mediaelement.min.css
110 ms
styles.css
543 ms
wpcf7-redirect-frontend.min.css
577 ms
shortcodes.css
132 ms
email-subscribers-public.css
156 ms
sfsi-style.css
185 ms
style.min.css
204 ms
latest.css
679 ms
font-awesome.min.css
524 ms
app.css
774 ms
style.css
653 ms
css
42 ms
all.css
160 ms
js_composer.min.css
591 ms
v4-shims.css
202 ms
jetpack.css
613 ms
jquery.min.js
628 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
725 ms
cnss.js
628 ms
js
89 ms
zcga.js
337 ms
v4-shims.min.css
954 ms
all.min.css
952 ms
core.min.js
954 ms
mouse.min.js
954 ms
sortable.min.js
743 ms
index.js
952 ms
index.js
951 ms
wpcf7r-fe.js
953 ms
coblocks-animation.js
963 ms
tiny-swiper.js
954 ms
coblocks-tinyswiper-initializer.js
962 ms
email-subscribers-public.js
953 ms
modernizr.custom.min.js
954 ms
jquery.shuffle.min.js
955 ms
api.js
62 ms
e-202403.js
36 ms
random-shuffle-min.js
961 ms
custom.js
935 ms
vendor.min.js
948 ms
underscore.min.js
875 ms
app.min.js
858 ms
wp-polyfill-inert.min.js
1113 ms
regenerator-runtime.min.js
1081 ms
wp-polyfill.min.js
1061 ms
index.js
569 ms
smush-lazy-load.min.js
548 ms
general.js
598 ms
js_composer_front.min.js
596 ms
gtm.js
276 ms
AdobeStock_338371708-scaled.jpeg
265 ms
AdobeStock_473940513-scaled.jpeg
503 ms
obelis-office-1-scaled.jpg
224 ms
fa-regular-400.ttf
148 ms
fa-solid-900.ttf
332 ms
fa-brands-400.ttf
625 ms
fa-v4compatibility.ttf
430 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
627 ms
embed.js
146 ms
widget
1026 ms
sdk.js
139 ms
fa-regular-400.woff
243 ms
fa-regular-400.woff
535 ms
fa-solid-900.woff
662 ms
fa-solid-900.woff
538 ms
fa-brands-400.woff
661 ms
fa-brands-400.woff
939 ms
recaptcha__en.js
381 ms
sdk.js
154 ms
obelis-web1.png
149 ms
obelis-web2.png
148 ms
js
374 ms
bat.js
651 ms
analytics.js
582 ms
mix-manifest.json
126 ms
509 ms
polyfill.min.js
461 ms
340 ms
website
598 ms
collect
173 ms
collect
221 ms
187024708.js
148 ms
embed-core.js
135 ms
96 ms
ga-audiences
95 ms
187024708
201 ms
stacktrace-with-promises-and-json-polyfills.min.js
103 ms
clarity.js
27 ms
collect
41 ms
collect
6 ms
c.gif
80 ms
obeliscosmetics.net accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
obeliscosmetics.net best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript
obeliscosmetics.net SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Obeliscosmetics.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Obeliscosmetics.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
obeliscosmetics.net
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Obeliscosmetics. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: