2.4 sec in total
75 ms
1.8 sec
576 ms
Click here to check amazing Ocean Footage content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about oceanfootage.com
[page_title_for_description] [/page_title_for_description] [meta_description_browse_page] [/meta_description_browse_page]
Visit oceanfootage.comWe analyzed Oceanfootage.com page load time and found that the first response time was 75 ms and then it took 2.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 45% of websites can load faster.
oceanfootage.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value1.8 s
89/100
10%
Value2.1 s
96/100
25%
Value4.7 s
69/100
10%
Value320 ms
76/100
30%
Value0.262
47/100
15%
Value5.8 s
67/100
10%
75 ms
21 ms
59 ms
48 ms
48 ms
Our browser made a total of 51 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 0% of them (0 request) were addressed to the original Oceanfootage.com, 8% (4 requests) were made to Js.zohostatic.com and 6% (3 requests) were made to Css.zohostatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (510 ms) relates to the external source Salesiq.zohopublic.com.
Page size can be reduced by 811.1 kB (52%)
1.6 MB
743.1 kB
In fact, the total size of Oceanfootage.com main page is 1.6 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 708.3 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 74.3 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 74.3 kB or 83% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 8.6 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Ocean Footage images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 479.5 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 479.5 kB or 68% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 248.6 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Oceanfootage.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 248.6 kB or 83% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 27 (56%)
48
21
The browser has sent 48 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Ocean Footage. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 18 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 6 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
www.naturefootage.com
75 ms
d5998cdc449ee57eae46b640165af477.css
21 ms
api.js
59 ms
30db2ef0cd2640babc292af21feed1a6.js
48 ms
www.naturefootage.com
48 ms
main.js
42 ms
3dba4578b515d6c02e66a4a6adae67e5.js
43 ms
css
41 ms
recaptcha__en.js
339 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
150 ms
analytics.js
272 ms
float.ls
493 ms
sdk.js
329 ms
plusone.js
294 ms
widgets.js
248 ms
login
225 ms
www.naturefootage.com
115 ms
logonature.jpg
112 ms
mail-icon.svg
34 ms
facebook-square-icon.svg
110 ms
twitter-icon.svg
117 ms
googleplus-icon.svg
118 ms
youtube-icon.svg
114 ms
vimeo-icon.svg
120 ms
magnifying_glass.png
120 ms
scroll_button_40x40_down.png
124 ms
overlay.png
123 ms
icomoon.woff
109 ms
icomoon.woff
109 ms
homepage_video.jpg
143 ms
play_btn60.png
138 ms
collect
19 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_0
68 ms
124 ms
xd_arbiter.php
152 ms
xd_arbiter.php
275 ms
lazyload.1.0.2.min.js
18 ms
floatsupportbtn.css
315 ms
track.js
70 ms
nf_home_nature_circle_200x200.png
22 ms
nf_home_ocean_circle_200x200.png
11 ms
nf_home_people_circle_200x200.png
25 ms
banner-1.jpg
28 ms
spacer.gif
84 ms
drawchat.ls
510 ms
wmsliteapi.js
9 ms
floatchat.css
75 ms
floatchat.js
32 ms
resource.js
26 ms
chatwindowtouch.css
74 ms
sprite.png
11 ms
oceanfootage.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
oceanfootage.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript
oceanfootage.com SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Oceanfootage.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Oceanfootage.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
oceanfootage.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Ocean Footage. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: