6.2 sec in total
2 sec
3.9 sec
349 ms
Welcome to oekostrom-vergleich.com homepage info - get ready to check Oekostrom Vergleich best content for Germany right away, or after learning these important things about oekostrom-vergleich.com
Echte Ökostromanbieter im Test- und Preisvergleich bei Ökostrom Vergleich. Aktuelle Infos, Tarife und News zu Anbietern von Ökostrom 2023.
Visit oekostrom-vergleich.comWe analyzed Oekostrom-vergleich.com page load time and found that the first response time was 2 sec and then it took 4.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 65% of websites can load faster.
oekostrom-vergleich.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.6 s
31/100
10%
Value6.4 s
9/100
25%
Value6.1 s
44/100
10%
Value450 ms
63/100
30%
Value0.002
100/100
15%
Value6.7 s
56/100
10%
2009 ms
123 ms
222 ms
229 ms
222 ms
Our browser made a total of 43 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 88% of them (38 requests) were addressed to the original Oekostrom-vergleich.com, 5% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com and 5% (2 requests) were made to Static.xx.fbcdn.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2 sec) belongs to the original domain Oekostrom-vergleich.com.
Page size can be reduced by 260.6 kB (42%)
615.1 kB
354.4 kB
In fact, the total size of Oekostrom-vergleich.com main page is 615.1 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 25% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 315.4 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 19.2 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 19.2 kB or 77% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 51.9 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Oekostrom Vergleich needs image optimization as it can save up to 51.9 kB or 16% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 110.1 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 110.1 kB or 61% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 79.4 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Oekostrom-vergleich.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 79.4 kB or 84% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 22 (52%)
42
20
The browser has sent 42 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Oekostrom Vergleich. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 7 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 12 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
www.oekostrom-vergleich.com
2009 ms
cwsl-horizontal.css
123 ms
reset.css
222 ms
layout.css
229 ms
typography.css
222 ms
joomla25.css
218 ms
1_template.css
214 ms
2_formalize.css
226 ms
3_menus.css
323 ms
style-style1.css
324 ms
cw-horizontal.css
338 ms
cwsl_style.css
336 ms
mootools-core.js
457 ms
core.js
332 ms
caption.js
425 ms
jquery.min.js
537 ms
superfish.js
437 ms
fontface.css
438 ms
ga.js
5 ms
__utm.gif
11 ms
body_bg.png
228 ms
header_bg.png
122 ms
oekostrom-vergleich.png
338 ms
sec_nav_bg.png
122 ms
nav_active.png
122 ms
menu_bg_trans.png
121 ms
gpe_strom_1_300x250a.gif
334 ms
polarstern_276.png
434 ms
1_banner_300X250_240113_rz.gif
237 ms
1oekostrom.gif
232 ms
2oekostrom.gif
334 ms
3oekostrom.gif
338 ms
naturstrom_300_250.gif
555 ms
wemio.jpg
549 ms
top_corners.png
410 ms
bread_bg.png
406 ms
divider.png
411 ms
bullet.png
606 ms
cw_social_16.png
515 ms
footer_bg.png
518 ms
like.php
99 ms
qeKvIRsJabD.js
30 ms
LVx-xkvaJ0b.png
23 ms
oekostrom-vergleich.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
oekostrom-vergleich.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript
oekostrom-vergleich.com SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
DE
N/A
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Oekostrom-vergleich.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that German is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Oekostrom-vergleich.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
oekostrom-vergleich.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Oekostrom Vergleich. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: