Report Summary

  • 0

    Performance

  • 0

    Accessibility

  • 0

    Best Practices

  • 0

    SEO

oilpulling.com

Oil Pulling, Wellness and Health Answers - Wellness and Health News, Original oil pulling site since 2004

Page Load Speed

1.3 sec in total

First Response

131 ms

Resources Loaded

746 ms

Page Rendered

377 ms

oilpulling.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to oilpulling.com homepage info - get ready to check Oil Pulling best content for United States right away, or after learning these important things about oilpulling.com

Wellness and Health News, Original oil pulling site since 2004

Visit oilpulling.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Oilpulling.com page load time and found that the first response time was 131 ms and then it took 1.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 20% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

oilpulling.com performance score

0

Network Requests Diagram

oilpulling.com

131 ms

style.css

48 ms

adsbygoogle.js

8 ms

FREE-OIL-PULLING-BOOK.jpg

105 ms

urchin.js

61 ms

Our browser made a total of 26 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 23% of them (6 requests) were addressed to the original Oilpulling.com, 19% (5 requests) were made to Pagead2.googlesyndication.com and 19% (5 requests) were made to Googleads.g.doubleclick.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (396 ms) relates to the external source Googleads.g.doubleclick.net.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 17.5 kB (8%)

Content Size

214.7 kB

After Optimization

197.2 kB

In fact, the total size of Oilpulling.com main page is 214.7 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 30% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 120.4 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-65%

Potential reduce by 13.3 kB

  • Original 20.3 kB
  • After minification 19.5 kB
  • After compression 7.0 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 13.3 kB or 65% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 396 B

  • Original 120.4 kB
  • After minification 120.0 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Oil Pulling images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-2%

Potential reduce by 1.4 kB

  • Original 70.8 kB
  • After minification 70.6 kB
  • After compression 69.5 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-76%

Potential reduce by 2.4 kB

  • Original 3.2 kB
  • After minification 2.8 kB
  • After compression 766 B

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Oilpulling.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 2.4 kB or 76% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 12 (52%)

Requests Now

23

After Optimization

11

The browser has sent 23 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Oil Pulling. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 8 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

SEO Factors

oilpulling.com SEO score

0

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    ISO-8859-1

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Oilpulling.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Oilpulling.com main page’s claimed encoding is iso-8859-1. Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Oil Pulling. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: