1.3 sec in total
174 ms
1 sec
70 ms
Visit oliveandmilo.com now to see the best up-to-date Olive And Milo content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about oliveandmilo.com
At Olive and Milo we bring your brand into the spotlight by building strategic plans and tell your story via social media to deliver the right customers to you.
Visit oliveandmilo.comWe analyzed Oliveandmilo.com page load time and found that the first response time was 174 ms and then it took 1.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 20% of websites can load faster.
oliveandmilo.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value7.9 s
0/100
10%
Value14.9 s
0/100
25%
Value28.9 s
0/100
10%
Value34,510 ms
0/100
30%
Value0.416
23/100
15%
Value51.1 s
0/100
10%
174 ms
48 ms
16 ms
17 ms
265 ms
Our browser made a total of 159 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 1% of them (2 requests) were addressed to the original Oliveandmilo.com, 95% (151 requests) were made to Static.parastorage.com and 3% (5 requests) were made to Frog.wix.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (265 ms) relates to the external source Frog.wix.com.
Page size can be reduced by 687.8 kB (62%)
1.1 MB
421.6 kB
In fact, the total size of Oliveandmilo.com main page is 1.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 80% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Javascripts take 1.0 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 62.6 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 62.6 kB or 80% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 624.7 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 624.7 kB or 61% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 557 B
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Oliveandmilo.com has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 149 (96%)
156
7
The browser has sent 156 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Olive And Milo. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 150 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
oliveandmilo.com
174 ms
www.oliveandmilo.com
48 ms
require.min.js
16 ms
main-r.min.js
17 ms
bt
265 ms
UpgradeBrowser.js
16 ms
ugc-viewer
236 ms
bt
239 ms
react-with-addons.min.js
21 ms
lodash.min.js
17 ms
wixCodeInit.min.js
16 ms
coreUtils.js
51 ms
coreUtils.min.js
36 ms
skins.min.js
69 ms
components.min.js
51 ms
core.min.js
71 ms
mobx.umd.min.js
68 ms
mobx-react.min.js
70 ms
TweenMax.min.js
69 ms
animations.min.js
157 ms
react-with-addons.min.js
157 ms
layout.min.js
157 ms
wixappsCore.min.js
156 ms
wixappsClassics.min.js
155 ms
container.min.js
154 ms
imageZoom.min.js
220 ms
mediaZoom.min.js
219 ms
imageZoomDisplayer.min.js
219 ms
matrixGallery.min.js
218 ms
slideShowGallery.min.js
218 ms
comboBoxInput.min.js
219 ms
dialogs.min.js
225 ms
table.min.js
225 ms
wixappsBuilder.min.js
224 ms
tpa.min.js
225 ms
dataFixer.min.js
224 ms
siteUtils.min.js
223 ms
image.min.js
250 ms
balata.min.js
251 ms
translationsUtils.min.js
251 ms
hammer.min.js
251 ms
utils.min.js
249 ms
fonts.min.js
248 ms
platformUtils-bundle.js
255 ms
loggingUtils.min.js
248 ms
imageClientApi.js
248 ms
swfobject.min.js
249 ms
santaProps.min.js
224 ms
displayer.min.js
215 ms
mousetrap.min.js
203 ms
DrawSVGPlugin.min.js
197 ms
react-dom.min.js
197 ms
ScrollToPlugin.min.js
198 ms
widgets.min.js
197 ms
react-dom-server.min.js
111 ms
imageCommon.min.js
111 ms
formCommon.min.js
111 ms
textCommon.min.js
111 ms
containerCommon.min.js
112 ms
socialCommon.min.js
111 ms
galleriesCommon.min.js
97 ms
buttonCommon.min.js
49 ms
compDesignUtils.min.js
48 ms
mediaCommon.min.js
49 ms
audioCommon.min.js
50 ms
skinExports.min.js
49 ms
compUtils.min.js
48 ms
mobileLayoutUtils.js
44 ms
pm-rpc.min.js
45 ms
tweenEngine.min.js
44 ms
multilingual.min.js
45 ms
render.min.js
45 ms
color.min.js
78 ms
zepto.min.js
76 ms
xss.min.js
77 ms
bluebird.min.js
76 ms
imageClientApi.min.js
76 ms
column.min.js
75 ms
siteBackground.min.js
75 ms
hoverBox.min.js
75 ms
mediaContainerFactory.min.js
75 ms
internalMarkings.min.js
74 ms
repeater.min.js
74 ms
zoomedImage.min.js
74 ms
menuButton.min.js
74 ms
messageView.min.js
74 ms
backgroundCommon.min.js
55 ms
bt
105 ms
css
88 ms
TweenMax.min.js
30 ms
svgShape.min.js
13 ms
adminLoginButton.min.js
14 ms
wTwitterFollow.min.js
13 ms
facebookComments.min.js
14 ms
verticalAnchorsMenu.min.js
18 ms
facebookShare.min.js
15 ms
vKShareButton.min.js
14 ms
youTubeSubscribeButton.min.js
15 ms
itunesButton.min.js
16 ms
skypeCallButton.min.js
16 ms
fileUploader.min.js
18 ms
pinItPinWidget.min.js
18 ms
popupCloseTextButton.min.js
18 ms
radioButton.min.js
20 ms
radioGroup.min.js
18 ms
documentMedia.min.js
31 ms
datePicker.min.js
31 ms
contactForm.min.js
32 ms
subscribeForm.min.js
30 ms
textArea.min.js
31 ms
loginSocialBar.min.js
32 ms
googleMap.min.js
32 ms
soundCloudWidget.min.js
35 ms
paypalButton.min.js
34 ms
imageButton.min.js
34 ms
linkBar.min.js
35 ms
spotifyPlayer.min.js
33 ms
spotifyFollow.min.js
35 ms
twitterFeed.min.js
37 ms
backToTopButton.min.js
36 ms
svgCommon.min.js
37 ms
facebookLike.min.js
38 ms
facebookLikeBox.min.js
37 ms
flickrBadgeWidget.min.js
38 ms
rssButton.min.js
38 ms
tinyMenu.min.js
34 ms
groupContainer.min.js
34 ms
wGooglePlusOne.min.js
34 ms
pinterestPinIt.min.js
34 ms
pinterestFollow.min.js
45 ms
wTwitterTweet.min.js
45 ms
audioPlayer.min.js
44 ms
loginButton.min.js
44 ms
htmlComponent.min.js
43 ms
deadComponent.min.js
44 ms
mediaPlayer.min.js
43 ms
mediaControls.min.js
43 ms
singleAudioPlayer.min.js
43 ms
quickActionBar.min.js
43 ms
boxSlideShowSlide.min.js
42 ms
stripSlideShowSlide.min.js
34 ms
page.min.js
31 ms
bgImageStrip.min.js
31 ms
popupContainer.min.js
31 ms
stripContainer.min.js
32 ms
stripColumnsContainer.min.js
31 ms
exitMobileModeButton.min.js
31 ms
tpaGalleries.min.js
30 ms
flashComponent.min.js
31 ms
stripSlideShow.min.js
31 ms
mobileActionsMenu.min.js
31 ms
verticalMenu.min.js
31 ms
disqusComments.min.js
31 ms
checkbox.min.js
30 ms
gridComponent.min.js
30 ms
languageSelector.min.js
31 ms
lodash.min.js
4 ms
languages.css
27 ms
bt
5 ms
oliveandmilo.com accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title
Links do not have a discernible name
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
oliveandmilo.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Page has valid source maps
oliveandmilo.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
N/A
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Oliveandmilo.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Oliveandmilo.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
oliveandmilo.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of PARSED_DOMAIN, but there is no image specified in description. It would be a good idea for the website admin to select a nice image that can properly represent the website in Open Graph data, otherwise the first found image will be taken for this purpose and social media information block will look like this: