Tools & Wizards About Us
oluf.no screenshot

Report Summary

  • 24

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    43% of other websites

  • 90

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 74% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 100

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    94% of websites

oluf.no

Oluf Lorentzen | Nettbutikk | Matvarer hjem

Page Load Speed

3.1 sec in total

First Response

255 ms

Resources Loaded

2.5 sec

Page Rendered

389 ms

oluf.no screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Oluf content for Norway. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about oluf.no

Oluf Lorentzen sender matvarer hjem til deg i spesialtilpasset kjøleemballasje. Vi har importert utsøkte smaker fra hele verden siden 1869.

Visit oluf.no

Key Findings

We analyzed Oluf.no page load time and found that the first response time was 255 ms and then it took 2.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 55% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

oluf.no performance score

24

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.0 s

23/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value4.5 s

37/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value6.5 s

38/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,560 ms

13/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.357

30/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value16.8 s

5/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

oluf.no

255 ms

www.oluf.no

617 ms

uc.js

146 ms

A.fontawesome.min.css,qv=202407041432.pagespeed.cf.D8UCoWnw13.css

240 ms

A.solid.min.css,qv=202407041432.pagespeed.cf.Cs5V7vkY69.css

334 ms

Our browser made a total of 32 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 59% of them (19 requests) were addressed to the original Oluf.no, 16% (5 requests) were made to Res.cloudinary.com and 9% (3 requests) were made to Static-chat.kundo.se. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1 sec) belongs to the original domain Oluf.no.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 202.1 kB (17%)

Content Size

1.2 MB

After Optimization

993.3 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Oluf.no main page is 1.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 45% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 600.1 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-89%

Potential reduce by 195.6 kB

  • Original 219.6 kB
  • After minification 130.2 kB
  • After compression 24.0 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 89.4 kB, which is 41% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 195.6 kB or 89% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 6.1 kB

  • Original 600.1 kB
  • After minification 593.9 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Oluf images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 168 B

  • Original 272.6 kB
  • After minification 272.6 kB
  • After compression 272.5 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 150 B

  • Original 103.2 kB
  • After minification 103.2 kB
  • After compression 103.0 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Oluf.no has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 18 (69%)

Requests Now

26

After Optimization

8

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 26 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Oluf. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 12 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 8 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

oluf.no

oluf.no

255 ms

www.oluf.no

www.oluf.no

617 ms

uc.js

uc.js

146 ms

A.fontawesome.min.css,qv=202407041432.pagespeed.cf.D8UCoWnw13.css

A.fontawesome.min.css,qv=202407041432.pagespeed.cf.D8UCoWnw13.css

240 ms

A.solid.min.css,qv=202407041432.pagespeed.cf.Cs5V7vkY69.css

A.solid.min.css,qv=202407041432.pagespeed.cf.Cs5V7vkY69.css

334 ms

A.light.min.css,qv=202407041432.pagespeed.cf.fTn3z4osB6.css

A.light.min.css,qv=202407041432.pagespeed.cf.fTn3z4osB6.css

358 ms

A.brands.min.css,qv=202407041432.pagespeed.cf.DwH4JASgjD.css

A.brands.min.css,qv=202407041432.pagespeed.cf.DwH4JASgjD.css

359 ms

A.v5-font-face.min.css,qv=202407041432.pagespeed.cf.s8d3FpsWGt.css

A.v5-font-face.min.css,qv=202407041432.pagespeed.cf.s8d3FpsWGt.css

359 ms

A.owl.carousel.min.css,qv=202407041432.pagespeed.cf.mUDoJnkSFg.css

A.owl.carousel.min.css,qv=202407041432.pagespeed.cf.mUDoJnkSFg.css

360 ms

A.stylesheet.css.pagespeed.cf.K8r7UO6pUk.css

A.stylesheet.css.pagespeed.cf.K8r7UO6pUk.css

583 ms

jquery-3.6.1.min.js,qv=202407041432.pagespeed.jm.9QZjzretGh.js

jquery-3.6.1.min.js,qv=202407041432.pagespeed.jm.9QZjzretGh.js

336 ms

bootstrap.bundle.min.js,qv=202407041432.pagespeed.ce.a69X8leWwz.js

bootstrap.bundle.min.js,qv=202407041432.pagespeed.ce.a69X8leWwz.js

569 ms

jquery.validate.min.js,qv=202407041432.pagespeed.jm.yDB-19wSeS.js

jquery.validate.min.js,qv=202407041432.pagespeed.jm.yDB-19wSeS.js

360 ms

gca.func.global.js,qv=202407041432.pagespeed.ce.qdeuu-fdV9.js

gca.func.global.js,qv=202407041432.pagespeed.ce.qdeuu-fdV9.js

367 ms

gca.func.search.js,qv=202407041432.pagespeed.ce.eeCesC-kRY.js

gca.func.search.js,qv=202407041432.pagespeed.ce.eeCesC-kRY.js

362 ms

owl.carousel.min.js,qv=202407041432.pagespeed.jm.iD9BtIsBTL.js

owl.carousel.min.js,qv=202407041432.pagespeed.jm.iD9BtIsBTL.js

447 ms

owl.carousel.min.js.pagespeed.jm.iD9BtIsBTL.js

owl.carousel.min.js.pagespeed.jm.iD9BtIsBTL.js

568 ms

widget.js

widget.js

314 ms

gtm.js

gtm.js

72 ms

fbevents.js

fbevents.js

22 ms

g_logo_default_1

g_logo_default_1

125 ms

g_cHmk4cyX_Q-017_1

g_cHmk4cyX_Q-017_1

296 ms

1.JiBnMqyl6S.gif

1.JiBnMqyl6S.gif

162 ms

fa-light-300.ttf

fa-light-300.ttf

1035 ms

fa-solid-900.ttf

fa-solid-900.ttf

576 ms

d

d

36 ms

d

d

41 ms

widget.a101de8fe25d.js

widget.a101de8fe25d.js

15 ms

widget.ae6c34f62e34.css

widget.ae6c34f62e34.css

16 ms

g_jOvr9fCk_Q-017_1

g_jOvr9fCk_Q-017_1

30 ms

g_MxZWzmSZ_Q-017_1

g_MxZWzmSZ_Q-017_1

248 ms

g_d7HUJuxw_Q-017_1

g_d7HUJuxw_Q-017_1

290 ms

Accessibility Review

oluf.no accessibility score

90

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

button, link, and menuitem elements do not have accessible names.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Best Practices

oluf.no best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

oluf.no SEO score

100

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    NO

  • Language Claimed

    NB

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Oluf.no can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Norwegian is used on the page, and it does not match the claimed language. Our system also found out that Oluf.no main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

oluf.no

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Oluf. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: