5 sec in total
373 ms
3.6 sec
995 ms
Click here to check amazing Ombea content for United Kingdom. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about ombea.com
Use Ombea® to measure, analyze and act on customer, employee and student feedback.
Visit ombea.comWe analyzed Ombea.com page load time and found that the first response time was 373 ms and then it took 4.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 70% of websites can load faster.
ombea.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.6 s
33/100
10%
Value12.6 s
0/100
25%
Value8.2 s
20/100
10%
Value3,670 ms
1/100
30%
Value0.129
82/100
15%
Value17.1 s
4/100
10%
373 ms
282 ms
31 ms
15 ms
476 ms
Our browser made a total of 61 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 72% of them (44 requests) were addressed to the original Ombea.com, 3% (2 requests) were made to Maxcdn.bootstrapcdn.com and 3% (2 requests) were made to Ajax.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.9 sec) belongs to the original domain Ombea.com.
Page size can be reduced by 466.8 kB (16%)
2.9 MB
2.5 MB
In fact, the total size of Ombea.com main page is 2.9 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 2.4 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 123.6 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 123.6 kB or 87% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 54.6 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Ombea images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 270.3 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 270.3 kB or 71% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 18.3 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Ombea.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 18.3 kB or 77% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 23 (42%)
55
32
The browser has sent 55 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Ombea. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 21 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 4 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
ombea.com
373 ms
gb
282 ms
css
31 ms
font-awesome.min.css
15 ms
ombea.css
476 ms
animate.css
243 ms
jquery.min.js
26 ms
bootstrap.min.js
136 ms
stepwizard.js
227 ms
jquery.nouislider.all.min.js
236 ms
validator.js
241 ms
timezones.full.min.js
544 ms
skrollr.min.js
256 ms
skrollr.menu.min.js
341 ms
inview.min.js
357 ms
bootstrap-formhelpers.js
752 ms
zcga.js
288 ms
fileinput.min.js
548 ms
ombea.js
544 ms
traffic-source%201.1.js
545 ms
analytics.js
152 ms
w.js
152 ms
ombea-banner-bg.png
1238 ms
logo.png
143 ms
bootstrap-formhelpers-countries.flags.png
810 ms
how-it-works-1.png
244 ms
how-it-works-2.png
245 ms
how-it-works-3.png
247 ms
ombea-responseapp-wired.png
759 ms
ombea-responseapp.png
1227 ms
ombea-responsepad-wired.png
880 ms
ombea-responsepad.png
1000 ms
ombea-response-scr1.png
1099 ms
ombea-response-scr2.png
1208 ms
ombea-response-scr3.png
1343 ms
cursor-hand.png
1123 ms
ombea-response-scr4.png
1444 ms
ombea-response-scr5.png
1469 ms
ombea-response-scr6.png
1536 ms
ombea-response-scr7.png
1570 ms
ombea-response-scr8.png
1356 ms
ombea-response-scr9.png
1463 ms
ombea-response-scr10.png
1478 ms
laptop-bg.png
1675 ms
ombea-response-scr11.png
1847 ms
support1.png
1923 ms
the-guidebook.png
1600 ms
logo-collection-1.png
1653 ms
logo-collection-2.png
1802 ms
OpenSans-Light-webfont.woff
1630 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
39 ms
collect
119 ms
573 ms
collect
572 ms
WidgetScript
834 ms
update.min.js
455 ms
ga-audiences
40 ms
_WidgetJPCB0
83 ms
_WidgetJPCB1.js
70 ms
jquery.min.js
11 ms
147285691458255940421.js
7 ms
ombea.com accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Links do not have a discernible name
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
ombea.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript
ombea.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Ombea.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Ombea.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
ombea.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Ombea. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: