5.3 sec in total
1.4 sec
3.4 sec
476 ms
Welcome to omegaweb.com homepage info - get ready to check Omega Web best content for United States right away, or after learning these important things about omegaweb.com
Omega Web Responsive Website Development Services for a wide range of websites. We build mobile friendly, and search engine friendly websites.
Visit omegaweb.comWe analyzed Omegaweb.com page load time and found that the first response time was 1.4 sec and then it took 3.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 65% of websites can load faster.
omegaweb.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.3 s
40/100
10%
Value9.6 s
0/100
25%
Value6.3 s
42/100
10%
Value150 ms
95/100
30%
Value0.198
62/100
15%
Value8.6 s
37/100
10%
1357 ms
115 ms
86 ms
58 ms
58 ms
Our browser made a total of 74 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 88% of them (65 requests) were addressed to the original Omegaweb.com, 3% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com and 3% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.4 sec) belongs to the original domain Omegaweb.com.
Page size can be reduced by 588.2 kB (60%)
973.3 kB
385.1 kB
In fact, the total size of Omegaweb.com main page is 973.3 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 40% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 466.9 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 71.0 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 71.0 kB or 83% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 30.4 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Omega Web needs image optimization as it can save up to 30.4 kB or 13% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 324.1 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 324.1 kB or 69% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 162.7 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Omegaweb.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 162.7 kB or 85% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 47 (66%)
71
24
The browser has sent 71 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Omega Web. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 22 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 20 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
www.omegaweb.com
1357 ms
style.css
115 ms
tabbed.css
86 ms
validationEngine.jquery.css
58 ms
wpapp-styles.css
58 ms
styles.css
58 ms
diggdigg-style.css
86 ms
edd.min.css
136 ms
cmam.css
87 ms
style.css
135 ms
wp-syntax.css
134 ms
jmig-masonry-layout.css
135 ms
jmig-masonry-v3-animation.css
137 ms
jmig-maosnry-v3-captions.css
140 ms
www.omegaweb.com
477 ms
style.responsive.css
141 ms
css
23 ms
us_slider.css
172 ms
jquery.js
197 ms
edd-ajax.min.js
169 ms
script.js
229 ms
script.responsive.js
199 ms
external-tracking.min.js
202 ms
jscripts.php
245 ms
jquery.js
256 ms
jquery.vticker-min.js
230 ms
wdstwitterwidget.css
243 ms
buttons.js
33 ms
jquery.form.min.js
246 ms
scripts.js
257 ms
cmam-adscript.js
270 ms
remove-gallery-class.js
271 ms
masonry.min.js
301 ms
masonry-init-v3.js
285 ms
qppr_frontend_script.min.js
299 ms
jquery.equalizer.js
300 ms
jscripts-ftr-min.js
314 ms
wp-embed.min.js
328 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
249 ms
css
14 ms
443 ms
ga.js
93 ms
ec774e98ec1077224efbbc12bd473c02_normal.png
113 ms
header.jpg
112 ms
object1589930810.png
111 ms
footerfacebookicon.png
110 ms
footertwittericon.png
111 ms
searchicon.png
111 ms
menuseparator.png
110 ms
spacer.gif
113 ms
postdateicon.png
112 ms
postauthoricon.png
113 ms
Backup-Your-WordPress-Site--150x150.jpg
112 ms
Building-a-Website-Design-business-150x150.png
456 ms
Schedule-Pencil2-150x150.jpg
111 ms
ios-logo2-150x150.png
454 ms
adobe_voice-150x150.png
459 ms
will-AI-take-web-design-jobs-150x150.jpg
455 ms
SEO-Leads-150x150.jpg
454 ms
RFP-150x150.jpg
454 ms
3DManWriting02small-144x144.jpg
456 ms
HexColors-150x150.jpg
457 ms
future-of-web-design2-150x150.jpg
455 ms
career-in-web-development-150x150.jpg
456 ms
NerdDog-150x150.jpg
460 ms
Home_office-150x150.jpg
457 ms
speed-up-page-load-time-144x144.jpg
458 ms
blockbullets.png
396 ms
footerrssicon.png
397 ms
K6ngFdK5haaaRGBV8waDwA.ttf
388 ms
TSDaXhyJuDJ-NBU0popSWA.ttf
390 ms
__utm.gif
351 ms
twitter-icon.png
358 ms
getAllAppDefault.esi
106 ms
omegaweb.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Form elements do not have associated labels
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
omegaweb.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
omegaweb.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Omegaweb.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Omegaweb.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
omegaweb.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Omega Web. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: