1.2 sec in total
85 ms
1.1 sec
64 ms
Welcome to omf.fund homepage info - get ready to check Omf best content for Ukraine right away, or after learning these important things about omf.fund
Open Mind Foundation – дослідження громадської думки через вивчення масових і групових емоцій. Гуманітарна допомога та допомога біженцям.
Visit omf.fundWe analyzed Omf.fund page load time and found that the first response time was 85 ms and then it took 1.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 20% of websites can load faster.
omf.fund performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.1 s
81/100
10%
Value6.3 s
10/100
25%
Value10.1 s
9/100
10%
Value2,000 ms
7/100
30%
Value0.212
59/100
15%
Value19.2 s
2/100
10%
85 ms
38 ms
41 ms
37 ms
74 ms
Our browser made a total of 53 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 2% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Omf.fund, 45% (24 requests) were made to Static.wixstatic.com and 25% (13 requests) were made to Static.parastorage.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (737 ms) relates to the external source Static.wixstatic.com.
Page size can be reduced by 545.2 kB (31%)
1.7 MB
1.2 MB
In fact, the total size of Omf.fund main page is 1.7 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 45% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.0 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 383.7 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 383.7 kB or 79% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 158.7 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Omf needs image optimization as it can save up to 158.7 kB or 15% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 2.8 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Number of requests can be reduced by 11 (29%)
38
27
The browser has sent 38 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Omf. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 12 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
www.omf.fund
85 ms
originTrials.41d7301a.bundle.min.js
38 ms
minified.js
41 ms
focus-within-polyfill.js
37 ms
polyfill.min.js
74 ms
thunderbolt-commons.24e46262.bundle.min.js
127 ms
main.8752ee81.bundle.min.js
128 ms
lodash.min.js
127 ms
react.production.min.js
31 ms
react-dom.production.min.js
127 ms
siteTags.bundle.min.js
140 ms
wix-perf-measure.umd.min.js
140 ms
Logo-OMF%201.png
230 ms
bundle.min.js
60 ms
bg1%20(1).png
228 ms
c34687_73000501f6314631b8e565c2ca481990~mv2.png
197 ms
cc78d0_b83119907168405496786fe7d576c971~mv2.png
205 ms
cc78d0_edf907556c61421cb662bb7e29409615~mv2.png
357 ms
cc78d0_06ac0d17874345bd85c5ea1fec951c17~mv2.png
235 ms
cc78d0_a7906559ebab4859861c9380b66f27ee~mv2.jpg
412 ms
cc78d0_a7906559ebab4859861c9380b66f27ee~mv2.jpg
389 ms
cc78d0_ea52443305d24cd69a8e01352fce6c05~mv2.jpg
368 ms
cc78d0_ea52443305d24cd69a8e01352fce6c05~mv2.jpg
457 ms
cc78d0_b22ff604922247ae97b8186947b1d3a3~mv2.jpg
419 ms
cc78d0_b22ff604922247ae97b8186947b1d3a3~mv2.jpg
496 ms
cc78d0_ab172050c79040e49dd6d5d8489af2db~mv2.png
520 ms
cc78d0_84710919d75a4c2291d30c500c29b93c~mv2.jpg
596 ms
cc78d0_84710919d75a4c2291d30c500c29b93c~mv2.jpg
597 ms
cc78d0_ec1dd96e1e8840f19f18ddb4d5483c79~mv2.jpg
590 ms
cc78d0_ec1dd96e1e8840f19f18ddb4d5483c79~mv2.jpg
605 ms
cc78d0_ca02cd99e38e435db1b18824260ccdf2~mv2.jpg
656 ms
cc78d0_ca02cd99e38e435db1b18824260ccdf2~mv2.jpg
654 ms
cc78d0_16b41f74d723491196501ec1100aefa1~mv2.jpeg
723 ms
cc78d0_16b41f74d723491196501ec1100aefa1~mv2.jpeg
733 ms
cc78d0_b994aefd46e446b5846b5e3429a555ce~mv2.png
737 ms
107 ms
106 ms
107 ms
106 ms
104 ms
105 ms
160 ms
155 ms
142 ms
141 ms
140 ms
148 ms
file.woff
464 ms
file.woff
472 ms
deprecation-en.v5.html
8 ms
bolt-performance
31 ms
deprecation-style.v5.css
13 ms
right-arrow.svg
11 ms
omf.fund accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
omf.fund best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript
omf.fund SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Omf.fund can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Omf.fund main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
omf.fund
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Omf. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: