18.6 sec in total
962 ms
17.2 sec
483 ms
Visit on32.ru now to see the best up-to-date On 32 content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about on32.ru
Все рестораны и весь отдых Брянска, Брянск
Visit on32.ruWe analyzed On32.ru page load time and found that the first response time was 962 ms and then it took 17.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 95% of websites can load faster.
on32.ru performance score
962 ms
875 ms
160 ms
297 ms
460 ms
Our browser made a total of 89 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 1% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original On32.ru, 78% (69 requests) were made to 32on.ru and 3% (3 requests) were made to Docs.google.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (10.6 sec) relates to the external source 32on.ru.
Page size can be reduced by 554.2 kB (51%)
1.1 MB
540.8 kB
In fact, the total size of On32.ru main page is 1.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 40% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 491.8 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 36.6 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 36.6 kB or 76% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 68.4 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, On 32 needs image optimization as it can save up to 68.4 kB or 16% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 353.7 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 353.7 kB or 72% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 95.6 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. On32.ru needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 95.6 kB or 82% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 27 (35%)
78
51
The browser has sent 78 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of On 32. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 17 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 12 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
on32.ru
962 ms
32on.ru
875 ms
style.css
160 ms
search.css
297 ms
jquery.min.js
460 ms
share.js
293 ms
easing.js
293 ms
jquery.ui.totop.min.js
292 ms
star.css
288 ms
jquery.mousewheel-3.0.2.pack.js
288 ms
jquery.fancybox-1.3.1.js
493 ms
jquery.fancybox-1.3.1.css
497 ms
carousels.css
553 ms
jquery.carouFredSel-5.0.7-packed.js
555 ms
bsp.css
549 ms
jquery-ui-1.8.16.custom.min.js
4218 ms
jquery.multiselect.css
1277 ms
jquery.multiselect.filter.css
1173 ms
jquery.multiselect.js
1518 ms
jquery.multiselect.filter.js
1401 ms
jquery.dataTables.css
1343 ms
jquery.dataTables.min.js
1554 ms
style.css
1492 ms
general.js
1599 ms
easing.js
2706 ms
jquery.ui.totop.min.js
2705 ms
ui.totop.css
2703 ms
share.js
479 ms
jot.css
2877 ms
informer.min.css
3265 ms
1817 ms
top100.jcn
756 ms
476 ms
160bg.gif
1545 ms
logo-mini2.png
177 ms
informer_1.png
1324 ms
logo_top.png
175 ms
search.png
175 ms
image.php
2185 ms
image.php
2162 ms
image.php
2663 ms
image.php
545 ms
image.php
1345 ms
image.php
592 ms
image.php
2106 ms
image.php
2157 ms
image.php
2454 ms
image.php
8097 ms
image.php
6347 ms
red.jpeg
2668 ms
so.jpeg
2825 ms
image.php
6313 ms
image.php
6329 ms
image.php
6493 ms
image.php
6430 ms
image.php
7401 ms
logo_bottom.png
6608 ms
PTS55F.ttf
7856 ms
watch.js
23 ms
viewform
513 ms
image.php
7742 ms
image.php
7159 ms
image.php
7736 ms
image.php
9149 ms
image.php
9949 ms
image.php
9407 ms
image.php
9473 ms
image.php
9298 ms
image.php
9815 ms
image.php
10120 ms
image.php
10123 ms
image.php
9952 ms
image.php
10485 ms
hit
1484 ms
top100.scn
273 ms
d0.png
1385 ms
n0.png
2611 ms
d0.png
2891 ms
search-xml.html
10286 ms
image.php
10564 ms
572998325-formview_embedded_ltr.css
157 ms
630931795-formviewer_prd.js
177 ms
image.php
10376 ms
image.php
10004 ms
forms_logo_2_small_dark.png
539 ms
image.php
9398 ms
miscellaneous_sprite.png
8680 ms
back_news.png
8572 ms
ui.totop.png
8926 ms
on32.ru SEO score
EN
N/A
ISO-8859-1
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise On32.ru can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that On32.ru main page’s claimed encoding is iso-8859-1. Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.
on32.ru
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of On 32. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: