8.7 sec in total
1.4 sec
6.7 sec
503 ms
Click here to check amazing Onceuponatrunk content for India. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about onceuponatrunk.com
This website is for sale! onceuponatrunk.com is your first and best source for all of the information you’re looking for. From general topics to more of what you would expect to find here, onceuponatr...
Visit onceuponatrunk.comWe analyzed Onceuponatrunk.com page load time and found that the first response time was 1.4 sec and then it took 7.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 80% of websites can load faster.
onceuponatrunk.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value17.6 s
0/100
10%
Value56.0 s
0/100
25%
Value29.5 s
0/100
10%
Value5,620 ms
0/100
30%
Value0.844
4/100
15%
Value31.3 s
0/100
10%
1411 ms
438 ms
439 ms
441 ms
1322 ms
Our browser made a total of 81 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 88% of them (71 requests) were addressed to the original Onceuponatrunk.com, 4% (3 requests) were made to Staticxx.facebook.com and 2% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.6 sec) belongs to the original domain Onceuponatrunk.com.
Page size can be reduced by 1.4 MB (42%)
3.4 MB
1.9 MB
In fact, the total size of Onceuponatrunk.com main page is 3.4 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 50% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.7 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 47.7 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 11.0 kB, which is 19% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 47.7 kB or 84% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 80.5 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Onceuponatrunk images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 900.2 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 900.2 kB or 77% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 399.1 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Onceuponatrunk.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 399.1 kB or 87% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 52 (66%)
79
27
The browser has sent 79 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Onceuponatrunk. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 42 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 12 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
www.onceuponatrunk.com
1411 ms
em_quickshop.css
438 ms
jquery.fancybox.css
439 ms
cloud-zoom.css
441 ms
prototype.js
1322 ms
jquery-1.10.2.min.js
1102 ms
jquery-migrate-1.2.1.min.js
647 ms
noconflict.js
654 ms
ccard.js
655 ms
validation.js
1093 ms
builder.js
865 ms
effects.js
1305 ms
dragdrop.js
1092 ms
controls.js
1301 ms
slider.js
1312 ms
js.js
1316 ms
form.js
1357 ms
translate.js
1521 ms
cookies.js
1523 ms
product.js
1748 ms
configurable.js
1535 ms
calendar.js
1542 ms
calendar-setup.js
1542 ms
cloud-zoom.1.0.3.min.js
1739 ms
jquery-ui.min.js
2614 ms
modernizr.custom.min.js
1758 ms
slick.min.js
1764 ms
jquery.mCustomScrollbar.concat.min.js
1765 ms
custom.js
1961 ms
selectivizr.js
1966 ms
matchMedia.js
1970 ms
matchMedia.addListener.js
1984 ms
enquire.js
1986 ms
app.js
2396 ms
jquery.cycle2.min.js
2184 ms
jquery.cycle2.swipe.min.js
2188 ms
css
68 ms
css
79 ms
styles.css
2447 ms
madisonisland.css
1783 ms
jquery-ui.css
2227 ms
custom.css
2412 ms
media.css
1794 ms
jquery.mCustomScrollbar.css
2187 ms
slick.css
2008 ms
slideshow.js
1973 ms
imagesloaded.js
1757 ms
minicart.js
1790 ms
msrp.js
1959 ms
jquery.fancybox.js
1760 ms
jquery.mousewheel-3.0.6.pack.js
1762 ms
em_quickshop.js
1755 ms
bundle.js
1777 ms
analytics.js
10 ms
logo.png
230 ms
fb.gif
228 ms
1.png
887 ms
2-1.png
662 ms
2-2.png
441 ms
1.jpg
462 ms
3.png
453 ms
4-1.jpg
898 ms
4-2.png
878 ms
5-1.png
683 ms
5-2.png
689 ms
6-1.png
1106 ms
6-2.png
907 ms
7-1.png
914 ms
7-2.png
1104 ms
7-3.png
1112 ms
small_loader.gif
1117 ms
clickbutton.png
1124 ms
sprite-1.png
1132 ms
collect
43 ms
ouatpopup2.jpg
1946 ms
all.js
33 ms
collect
67 ms
86 ms
xd_arbiter.php
35 ms
xd_arbiter.php
55 ms
xd_arbiter.php
9 ms
onceuponatrunk.com accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Links do not have a discernible name
Tables and lists
These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
List items (<li>) are not contained within <ul> or <ol> parent elements.
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
onceuponatrunk.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Requests the notification permission on page load
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript
onceuponatrunk.com SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
robots.txt is not valid
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
N/A
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Onceuponatrunk.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else), while the claimed language is English. Our system also found out that Onceuponatrunk.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
onceuponatrunk.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Onceuponatrunk. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: