4.6 sec in total
517 ms
3.7 sec
364 ms
Click here to check amazing One content for United Kingdom. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about one.world
Original designs, beautiful craftsmanship and affordable prices. We have sofas, tables, chairs, mirrors & more. Shop online or visit our London stores.
Visit one.worldWe analyzed One.world page load time and found that the first response time was 517 ms and then it took 4.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 65% of websites can load faster.
one.world performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.9 s
25/100
10%
Value22.4 s
0/100
25%
Value24.8 s
0/100
10%
Value26,180 ms
0/100
30%
Value0.035
100/100
15%
Value43.7 s
0/100
10%
517 ms
261 ms
200 ms
285 ms
293 ms
Our browser made a total of 84 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 2% of them (2 requests) were addressed to the original One.world, 76% (64 requests) were made to Cdn.one.world and 10% (8 requests) were made to Use.typekit.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.8 sec) relates to the external source Cdn.one.world.
Page size can be reduced by 131.4 kB (8%)
1.7 MB
1.6 MB
In fact, the total size of One.world main page is 1.7 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.4 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 93.7 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 93.7 kB or 83% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 29.0 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. One images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 8.4 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 239 B
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. One.world has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 60 (82%)
73
13
The browser has sent 73 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of One. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 61 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
www.one.world
517 ms
nll8aag.js
261 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
200 ms
style.min.css
285 ms
style.css
293 ms
js
363 ms
conversion_async.js
327 ms
scripts.min.js
1624 ms
modernizr.custom.min.js
764 ms
underscore.min.js
286 ms
jquery-3.3.1.min.js
280 ms
el.NoConflict.min.js
286 ms
jquery.easing.1.4.1.min.js
323 ms
jquery.history.min.js
321 ms
jquery.transit.min.js
320 ms
jquery.requestAnimationFrame.min.js
319 ms
requestTimeoutInterval.min.js
329 ms
imagesloaded.pkgd.min.js
357 ms
jquery.lazyload.min.js
359 ms
jquery.tooltipster.min.js
355 ms
js.cookie.min.js
415 ms
el.Logger.min.js
414 ms
el.Utils.min.js
418 ms
el.DateUtils.min.js
415 ms
el.HistoryService.min.js
418 ms
el.LoadingSpinnerView.min.js
418 ms
el.NumberInputView.min.js
417 ms
el.ModalOverlayView.min.js
419 ms
el.PrimaryNavigationView.min.js
423 ms
el.PrimaryNavIndicatorView.min.js
1793 ms
el.SocialBannerView.min.js
419 ms
el.FeatureSlideshowView.min.js
422 ms
el.PromotionBannerView.min.js
420 ms
el.HomePageView.min.js
422 ms
el.ProductScrollerView.min.js
423 ms
el.NewsletterSignupView.min.js
423 ms
el.AjaxRequestQueue.min.js
423 ms
el.Post.min.js
1736 ms
el.Page.min.js
423 ms
el.PostService.min.js
449 ms
el.PostView.min.js
448 ms
el.Product.min.js
777 ms
picturefill.min.js
271 ms
klaviyo.js
228 ms
el.ProductListingView.min.js
175 ms
el.PostListingView.min.js
341 ms
el.ProductDetailView.min.js
623 ms
el.BagView.min.js
445 ms
el.UserService.min.js
443 ms
el.ThirdPartyTracker.min.js
453 ms
el.BagWishlistService.min.js
831 ms
el.MapView.min.js
455 ms
el.SearchBoxView.min.js
432 ms
el.ShareView.min.js
435 ms
el.SearchResultsView.min.js
437 ms
fbevents.js
266 ms
el.CurrencyCountrySelectorView.min.js
389 ms
el.LiveChatView.min.js
397 ms
fluidvids.min.js
401 ms
el.bootstrap.js
408 ms
scripts.js
418 ms
wp-embed.min.js
473 ms
one-world-logo.png
770 ms
sprite.png
950 ms
analytics.js
111 ms
Biko_Regular.woff
533 ms
Biko_Bold.woff
541 ms
195832101017463
119 ms
preloader.gif
356 ms
d
28 ms
d
44 ms
d
48 ms
d
64 ms
d
105 ms
d
112 ms
d
134 ms
SK7004-2.jpg
724 ms
IS7102-OWT-1-720x720.jpg
470 ms
CC7038-OWT-1-720x720.jpg
329 ms
DV7073SG-OWT-1-720x720.jpg
332 ms
press-coverage-1.png
342 ms
one-world-forrest.png
659 ms
p.gif
24 ms
widget.js
474 ms
one.world accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
Links do not have a discernible name
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
one.world best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Page has valid source maps
one.world SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise One.world can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that One.world main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
one.world
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of One. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: