5.1 sec in total
172 ms
4.6 sec
401 ms
Welcome to ongood.ngo homepage info - get ready to check Ongood best content for Tanzania right away, or after learning these important things about ongood.ngo
Home
Visit ongood.ngoWe analyzed Ongood.ngo page load time and found that the first response time was 172 ms and then it took 5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 70% of websites can load faster.
ongood.ngo performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value1.6 s
94/100
10%
Value4.3 s
42/100
25%
Value1.9 s
100/100
10%
Value560 ms
53/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value3.5 s
92/100
10%
172 ms
85 ms
912 ms
253 ms
255 ms
Our browser made a total of 107 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 50% of them (54 requests) were addressed to the original Ongood.ngo, 15% (16 requests) were made to Maps.googleapis.com and 12% (13 requests) were made to Ngo-portal-prod.s3-eu-west-1.amazonaws.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.6 sec) relates to the external source Ngo-portal-prod.s3-eu-west-1.amazonaws.com.
Page size can be reduced by 3.2 MB (70%)
4.6 MB
1.3 MB
In fact, the total size of Ongood.ngo main page is 4.6 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 3.0 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 2.4 MB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 2.4 MB or 80% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 93.8 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Ongood needs image optimization as it can save up to 93.8 kB or 17% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 640.3 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 640.3 kB or 70% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 93.5 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Ongood.ngo needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 93.5 kB or 77% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 55 (57%)
97
42
The browser has sent 97 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Ongood. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 31 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 26 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
ongood.ngo
172 ms
portal
85 ms
912 ms
system.base.css
253 ms
system.menus.css
255 ms
system.messages.css
257 ms
system.theme.css
257 ms
comment.css
260 ms
date.css
334 ms
datepicker.1.7.css
336 ms
date_repeat_field.css
340 ms
field.css
340 ms
node.css
346 ms
search.css
414 ms
user.css
418 ms
views.css
419 ms
ckeditor.css
421 ms
ctools.css
431 ms
locale.css
492 ms
features_homepage.css
498 ms
styles-general.css
499 ms
styles-mobile.css
506 ms
fluid-mobile.css
516 ms
jquery.min.js
96 ms
js__JpjMmgka5z4UxETMvzsuPS4IzInFWS1vzQW3wg3AtnA__n7uDCwgG8mjWGHt0SU0Ypj2XUH5Bm6Xv8SybKFGFfrY__mHKUIz2Bn9eWvIoCRb1BK5OEWMBLeKC6_igJtzEAg20.js
571 ms
share-buttons.js
575 ms
jquery.min.js
107 ms
js__zuV3lPFVqU6uAD9D72dWTeKgXTXDAgsuzBP2La4IKzM__xwIMnxQW6vw4ymQtOI5G6dZQ1YKDu8k4NyPJEVpHuHA__mHKUIz2Bn9eWvIoCRb1BK5OEWMBLeKC6_igJtzEAg20.js
818 ms
js__WKzbpP-dzDnT1dL8qbt3jhjaUynhxhyeAKPwof91ahU__kBMQQ6MreHFpexy93hwVHrQb92x_6NtQJ5FeeGsdOj4__mHKUIz2Bn9eWvIoCRb1BK5OEWMBLeKC6_igJtzEAg20.js
590 ms
js
106 ms
infobox.js
115 ms
markerclusterer.js
126 ms
js__VsdE4Js9wBA8VvQyuTgH-pi5keDsjADHoyr7tPb58as___-SxIZJIqgBxHfHLs7m-BT3Ih78GtwqGkZepppuLPVo__mHKUIz2Bn9eWvIoCRb1BK5OEWMBLeKC6_igJtzEAg20.js
596 ms
css
93 ms
autocomplete.js
645 ms
map.js
651 ms
foundation.min.js
27 ms
foundation.dropdown.min.js
31 ms
app-ck.js
85 ms
jquery.flexslider-min.js
209 ms
jquery.colorbox-min.js
85 ms
readmore.min.js
84 ms
DetectRTC.js
206 ms
arsmaquettepro-regular.woff
85 ms
styles-tablet.css
89 ms
styles-desktop.css
87 ms
fluid-tablet.css
83 ms
fluid-desktop.css
84 ms
analytics.js
56 ms
ongood-logo.png
98 ms
search_icon.png
97 ms
triangle-72.png
94 ms
1173 ms
footer_logo-72.png
92 ms
blue_dots-72.png
372 ms
ngo_icons.woff
374 ms
WebinarSeriesImage-min.jpg
620 ms
thumb4.jpg
598 ms
dfdf_0.png
1565 ms
image_dots-72.png
343 ms
collect
302 ms
collect
297 ms
elevation-map-bg.png
301 ms
check-logged-in
145 ms
impactofadollar-comprehensive-nocolons-v3.png
469 ms
NGOfacts_causecampaign_twitter%203-min.jpg
426 ms
NGOfactsandstats_ongoodblogimage%20%281%29-min.jpg
503 ms
image_1-min.jpg
524 ms
RebuildNepalTwitter_0-min.jpg
557 ms
impactofadollar-comprehensive-nocolons-v3.png
617 ms
NGOfacts_causecampaign_twitter%203-min.jpg
579 ms
NGOfactsandstats_ongoodblogimage%20%281%29-min.jpg
601 ms
image_1-min.jpg
631 ms
RebuildNepalTwitter_0-min.jpg
664 ms
vid_arrow-72.png
95 ms
drop-72.png
90 ms
icomoon.woff
93 ms
common.js
240 ms
map.js
266 ms
overlay.js
264 ms
util.js
314 ms
marker.js
263 ms
onion.js
95 ms
openhand_8_8.cur
166 ms
ViewportInfoService.GetViewportInfo
125 ms
stats.js
123 ms
controls.js
113 ms
transparent.png
92 ms
gm_marker.png
131 ms
css
21 ms
google4.png
62 ms
mapcnt6.png
31 ms
sv5.png
32 ms
vt
31 ms
vt
22 ms
vt
19 ms
vt
21 ms
vt
159 ms
2UX7WLTfW3W8TclTUvlFyQ.woff
224 ms
RxZJdnzeo3R5zSexge8UUT8E0i7KZn-EPnyo3HZu7kw.woff
236 ms
Hgo13k-tfSpn0qi1SFdUfT8E0i7KZn-EPnyo3HZu7kw.woff
257 ms
d-6IYplOFocCacKzxwXSOD8E0i7KZn-EPnyo3HZu7kw.woff
257 ms
tmapctrl.png
212 ms
cb_scout5.png
211 ms
tmapctrl4.png
218 ms
google_white5.png
217 ms
AuthenticationService.Authenticate
54 ms
ongood.ngo accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
ongood.ngo best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
ongood.ngo SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Ongood.ngo can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Ongood.ngo main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
ongood.ngo
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Ongood. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: