Tools & Wizards About Us
onlineresult.in screenshot

Report Summary

  • 46

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    65% of other websites

  • 94

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 83% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 88

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    65% of websites

onlineresult.in

CSVTU, Bilaspur, Sarguja, SNPV University examination results 2025 Chhattishgarh | OnlineResult.in - OnlineResult.in

Page Load Speed

1.7 sec in total

First Response

409 ms

Resources Loaded

1.2 sec

Page Rendered

87 ms

onlineresult.in screenshot

About Website

Welcome to onlineresult.in homepage info - get ready to check Online Result best content right away, or after learning these important things about onlineresult.in

Official web portal of bilaspur,SNPV,sarguja and Ayush University for publishing several streams of Science, Arts, Commerce, Law and Education exam result

Visit onlineresult.in

Key Findings

We analyzed Onlineresult.in page load time and found that the first response time was 409 ms and then it took 1.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 30% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

onlineresult.in performance score

46

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.3 s

76/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value2.7 s

85/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value4.8 s

66/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,470 ms

14/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.356

31/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value10.9 s

21/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

onlineresult.in

409 ms

bootstrap.min.css

48 ms

fontello.min.css

268 ms

bundle.min.css

460 ms

adsbygoogle.js

91 ms

Our browser made a total of 12 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 8% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Onlineresult.in, 33% (4 requests) were made to Content.resulthour.com and 25% (3 requests) were made to Ajax.aspnetcdn.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (460 ms) relates to the external source Content.resulthour.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 75.2 kB (32%)

Content Size

236.2 kB

After Optimization

161.0 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Onlineresult.in main page is 236.2 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. Only 10% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 169.7 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-80%

Potential reduce by 18.7 kB

  • Original 23.3 kB
  • After minification 18.2 kB
  • After compression 4.6 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 5.1 kB, which is 22% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 18.7 kB or 80% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-35%

Potential reduce by 4.3 kB

  • Original 12.0 kB
  • After minification 7.8 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Online Result needs image optimization as it can save up to 4.3 kB or 35% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-26%

Potential reduce by 43.5 kB

  • Original 169.7 kB
  • After minification 169.7 kB
  • After compression 126.2 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 43.5 kB or 26% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-28%

Potential reduce by 8.8 kB

  • Original 31.2 kB
  • After minification 31.2 kB
  • After compression 22.4 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Onlineresult.in needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 8.8 kB or 28% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 4 (40%)

Requests Now

10

After Optimization

6

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 10 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Online Result. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 5 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

onlineresult.in

onlineresult.in

409 ms

bootstrap.min.css

bootstrap.min.css

48 ms

fontello.min.css

fontello.min.css

268 ms

bundle.min.css

bundle.min.css

460 ms

adsbygoogle.js

adsbygoogle.js

91 ms

jquery-2.2.0.min.js

jquery-2.2.0.min.js

46 ms

bootstrap.min.js

bootstrap.min.js

65 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

58 ms

onlineresult.png

onlineresult.png

60 ms

fontello.woff

fontello.woff

224 ms

collect

collect

12 ms

js

js

64 ms

Accessibility Review

onlineresult.in accessibility score

94

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Best Practices

onlineresult.in best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

onlineresult.in SEO score

88

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Onlineresult.in can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Onlineresult.in main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

onlineresult.in

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Online Result. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: