Tools & Wizards About Us
onomagic.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 40

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    59% of other websites

  • 87

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 66% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 91

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    70% of websites

onomagic.com

Onomagic | a house for digital publishing brands

Page Load Speed

2.8 sec in total

First Response

88 ms

Resources Loaded

2.6 sec

Page Rendered

61 ms

onomagic.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Onomagic content for Israel. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about onomagic.com

Onomagic - Creating Magic With Words. Our magazines engage and thrill millions of monthly loyal readers who interact daily with our premium content.

Visit onomagic.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Onomagic.com page load time and found that the first response time was 88 ms and then it took 2.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 50% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

onomagic.com performance score

40

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.9 s

55/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value8.0 s

2/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value3.5 s

88/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value860 ms

33/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.049

99/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value14.2 s

9/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

www.onomagic.com

88 ms

minified.js

44 ms

focus-within-polyfill.js

42 ms

polyfill.min.js

896 ms

thunderbolt-commons.a788914e.bundle.min.js

87 ms

Our browser made a total of 64 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 2% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Onomagic.com, 52% (33 requests) were made to Static.wixstatic.com and 23% (15 requests) were made to Static.parastorage.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.3 sec) relates to the external source Static.wixstatic.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 366.1 kB (43%)

Content Size

860.1 kB

After Optimization

494.0 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript

In fact, the total size of Onomagic.com main page is 860.1 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 50% of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 403.1 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-78%

Potential reduce by 313.8 kB

  • Original 403.1 kB
  • After minification 401.3 kB
  • After compression 89.3 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 313.8 kB or 78% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-24%

Potential reduce by 48.0 kB

  • Original 196.7 kB
  • After minification 148.8 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Onomagic needs image optimization as it can save up to 48.0 kB or 24% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-2%

Potential reduce by 4.2 kB

  • Original 260.3 kB
  • After minification 260.2 kB
  • After compression 256.0 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 10 (23%)

Requests Now

44

After Optimization

34

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 44 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Onomagic. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 11 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

www.onomagic.com

www.onomagic.com

88 ms

minified.js

minified.js

44 ms

focus-within-polyfill.js

focus-within-polyfill.js

42 ms

polyfill.min.js

polyfill.min.js

896 ms

thunderbolt-commons.a788914e.bundle.min.js

thunderbolt-commons.a788914e.bundle.min.js

87 ms

main.1adb5ce4.bundle.min.js

main.1adb5ce4.bundle.min.js

86 ms

main.renderer.1d21f023.bundle.min.js

main.renderer.1d21f023.bundle.min.js

35 ms

lodash.min.js

lodash.min.js

89 ms

react.production.min.js

react.production.min.js

85 ms

react-dom.production.min.js

react-dom.production.min.js

87 ms

siteTags.bundle.min.js

siteTags.bundle.min.js

86 ms

Logo.png

Logo.png

349 ms

girl.jpg

girl.jpg

357 ms

magic.png

magic.png

520 ms

f39cf6_0c00bfabe4ec4ff9b69fe8ca2481a5c9~mv2.png

f39cf6_0c00bfabe4ec4ff9b69fe8ca2481a5c9~mv2.png

346 ms

f39cf6_4d3b97c785de4203b4e9d549baff6b61~mv2.png

f39cf6_4d3b97c785de4203b4e9d549baff6b61~mv2.png

375 ms

icon_1.png

icon_1.png

444 ms

icon_2.png

icon_2.png

618 ms

icon_3.png

icon_3.png

515 ms

icon_4.png

icon_4.png

642 ms

computer.png

computer.png

633 ms

icon_a3.png

icon_a3.png

639 ms

icon_a2.png

icon_a2.png

735 ms

icon_a1.png

icon_a1.png

722 ms

bg_4.png

bg_4.png

841 ms

Uplift%20icon.png

Uplift%20icon.png

834 ms

The%20Inner%20news.png

The%20Inner%20news.png

810 ms

perspective.png

perspective.png

787 ms

monetization%20icon.png

monetization%20icon.png

921 ms

ad%20layout%20icon.png

ad%20layout%20icon.png

997 ms

set%20up%20icon.png

set%20up%20icon.png

1021 ms

appnexus.png

appnexus.png

1016 ms

Rubicon_project_Logo-2017_oASudG4.png

Rubicon_project_Logo-2017_oASudG4.png

1030 ms

logo-teads.png

logo-teads.png

1069 ms

922-9226223_brand-resources-index-exchan.png

922-9226223_brand-resources-index-exchan.png

1102 ms

1280px-RhythmOne_logo_svg.png

1280px-RhythmOne_logo_svg.png

1211 ms

google-logo-transparent.png

google-logo-transparent.png

1220 ms

OpenX_Logo.png

OpenX_Logo.png

1330 ms

TripleLift_Orange-1.png

TripleLift_Orange-1.png

1300 ms

e3bf95a9cdd441ebaf55f139b1b5a7b8.png

e3bf95a9cdd441ebaf55f139b1b5a7b8.png

1028 ms

bundle.min.js

bundle.min.js

132 ms

opensans-regular-webfont.woff

opensans-regular-webfont.woff

29 ms

opensans-bold-webfont.woff

opensans-bold-webfont.woff

30 ms

file.woff

file.woff

1004 ms

file.woff

file.woff

1123 ms

file.woff

file.woff

1169 ms

file.woff

file.woff

1141 ms

908c4810-64db-4b46-bb8e-823eb41f68c0.woff

908c4810-64db-4b46-bb8e-823eb41f68c0.woff

8 ms

102 ms

98 ms

97 ms

103 ms

97 ms

97 ms

140 ms

132 ms

128 ms

133 ms

133 ms

130 ms

deprecation-en.v5.html

deprecation-en.v5.html

6 ms

bolt-performance

bolt-performance

16 ms

deprecation-style.v5.css

deprecation-style.v5.css

10 ms

right-arrow.svg

right-arrow.svg

11 ms

Accessibility Review

onomagic.com accessibility score

87

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Best Practices

onomagic.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

onomagic.com SEO score

91

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Onomagic.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Onomagic.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

onomagic.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Onomagic. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: