8.2 sec in total
82 ms
7.6 sec
520 ms
Visit onsharp.com now to see the best up-to-date Onsharp content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about onsharp.com
Onsharp provides custom software, app development, and high-end website solutions to take you from where you are to where you want to be.
Visit onsharp.comWe analyzed Onsharp.com page load time and found that the first response time was 82 ms and then it took 8.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 85% of websites can load faster.
onsharp.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.9 s
52/100
10%
Value5.6 s
17/100
25%
Value7.8 s
23/100
10%
Value1,790 ms
10/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value14.1 s
9/100
10%
82 ms
2635 ms
322 ms
300 ms
134 ms
Our browser made a total of 162 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 64% of them (104 requests) were addressed to the original Onsharp.com, 14% (22 requests) were made to Maps.google.com and 7% (11 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.9 sec) belongs to the original domain Onsharp.com.
Page size can be reduced by 2.8 MB (68%)
4.1 MB
1.3 MB
In fact, the total size of Onsharp.com main page is 4.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Javascripts take 1.7 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 159.3 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 159.3 kB or 84% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 38.6 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Onsharp images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 1.2 MB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 1.2 MB or 69% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 1.4 MB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Onsharp.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 1.4 MB or 87% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 96 (67%)
144
48
The browser has sent 144 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Onsharp. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 54 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 39 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
onsharp.com
82 ms
www.onsharp.com
2635 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
322 ms
dashicons.min.css
300 ms
jquery-ui-dialog.min.css
134 ms
styles.css
132 ms
easy-modal-site.css
158 ms
sb-instagram.css
216 ms
font-awesome.min.css
26 ms
settings.css
279 ms
style.css
192 ms
base.css
327 ms
buttons.css
290 ms
mfn-icons.css
412 ms
grid.css
342 ms
layout.css
1083 ms
shortcodes.css
637 ms
variables.css
796 ms
style-simple.css
823 ms
animations.min.css
645 ms
jquery.ui.all.css
688 ms
prettyPhoto.css
1078 ms
jplayer.blue.monday.css
1053 ms
responsive.css
902 ms
css
60 ms
css
73 ms
custom.css
831 ms
css
83 ms
eventon_styles.css
1052 ms
font-awesome.css
1123 ms
wv_styles.css
962 ms
fc_styles.css
1011 ms
js_composer.min.css
2917 ms
modules.min.css
1674 ms
font-awesome.min.css
1160 ms
elegant-icons.css
1453 ms
magnific-popup.min.css
1112 ms
jquery.js
1577 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
1185 ms
jquery.themepunch.tools.min.js
1541 ms
jquery.themepunch.revolution.min.js
1369 ms
css
18 ms
css
16 ms
eventon_dynamic_styles.css
1253 ms
owl.carousel.min.css
1026 ms
core.min.js
1022 ms
widget.min.js
1116 ms
mouse.min.js
1124 ms
resizable.min.js
1236 ms
draggable.min.js
1593 ms
button.min.js
1172 ms
position.min.js
1181 ms
dialog.min.js
1617 ms
wpdialog.min.js
1218 ms
jquery.transit.min.js
1269 ms
js
44 ms
easy-modal-site.js
1380 ms
sb-instagram.js
1347 ms
ssba.min.js
1241 ms
sortable.min.js
1321 ms
tabs.min.js
1241 ms
accordion.min.js
1661 ms
plugins.js
1675 ms
menu.js
1195 ms
animations.min.js
1174 ms
jplayer.min.js
1377 ms
scripts.js
1302 ms
comment-reply.min.js
1196 ms
modules.min.js
1709 ms
wp-embed.min.js
1300 ms
js_composer_front.min.js
1355 ms
owl.carousel.min.js
1374 ms
projects.min.js
1564 ms
gmaps.js
1591 ms
jquery.easing.1.3.js
1175 ms
jquery.mobile.min.js
1544 ms
wv_script.js
1047 ms
Onsharp_logo.jpg
686 ms
WebInAWeek_Hero.jpg
243 ms
SocialEmployee_Hero1.jpg
686 ms
ChoosingAWebsitePartner.jpg
168 ms
OtterTailPowerCompanyHero.jpg
182 ms
OTPCReverse.png
140 ms
ProfitPros_HERO.jpg
639 ms
FMWFHero.jpg
304 ms
FMWFChamberReverse.png
303 ms
SocialEmpHomeImage2.png
304 ms
LCS_ProjectsFeatured.jpg
639 ms
NDAut_ClientStory_ProjectsFeatured.jpg
819 ms
FMWF_ActionPlans_ProjectFeatured.jpg
685 ms
Erbs_WebsiteFeatured.jpg
684 ms
FMWF_StateofTech_ProjectImage.jpg
683 ms
WebsiteImagery_Featured.jpg
867 ms
SES_Jody_Featured.jpg
829 ms
NonprofitWebsite_Featured.jpg
815 ms
HighFiveFriday_Featured.jpg
887 ms
InternsVoice_Featured.jpg
828 ms
onsharp_footer.png
867 ms
gtm.js
136 ms
cJZKeOuBrn4kERxqtaUH3T8E0i7KZn-EPnyo3HZu7kw.woff
40 ms
DXI1ORHCpsQm3Vp6mXoaTXhCUOGz7vYGh680lGh-uXM.woff
39 ms
k3k702ZOKiLJc3WVjuplzHhCUOGz7vYGh680lGh-uXM.woff
98 ms
EInbV5DfGHOiMmvb1Xr-hnhCUOGz7vYGh680lGh-uXM.woff
99 ms
mfn-icons.woff
1305 ms
zhcz-_WihjSQC0oHJ9TCYBsxEYwM7FgeyaSgU71cLG0.woff
98 ms
el.woff
1043 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
1538 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
15 ms
analytics.js
122 ms
widgets.js
405 ms
sdk.js
514 ms
revolution.extension.slideanims.min.js
576 ms
revolution.extension.actions.min.js
397 ms
revolution.extension.layeranimation.min.js
577 ms
revolution.extension.navigation.min.js
576 ms
common.js
154 ms
util.js
182 ms
geocoder.js
179 ms
grab.png
449 ms
sprite.png
450 ms
box_shadow.png
449 ms
top_bar_right_shadow.png
810 ms
collect
58 ms
collect
139 ms
-g5pDUSRgvxvOl5u-a_WHw.woff
50 ms
HqHm7BVC_nzzTui2lzQTDT8E0i7KZn-EPnyo3HZu7kw.woff
49 ms
AuthenticationService.Authenticate
106 ms
GeocodeService.Search
183 ms
134 ms
xd_arbiter.php
575 ms
map.js
14 ms
overlay.js
13 ms
StaticMapService.GetMapImage
454 ms
onion.js
64 ms
ViewportInfoService.GetViewportInfo
634 ms
stats.js
16 ms
controls.js
14 ms
marker.png
627 ms
transparent.png
580 ms
css
530 ms
google4.png
180 ms
mapcnt6.png
183 ms
sv5.png
186 ms
revicons.woff
149 ms
2UX7WLTfW3W8TclTUvlFyQ.woff
80 ms
RxZJdnzeo3R5zSexge8UUT8E0i7KZn-EPnyo3HZu7kw.woff
79 ms
Hgo13k-tfSpn0qi1SFdUfT8E0i7KZn-EPnyo3HZu7kw.woff
80 ms
d-6IYplOFocCacKzxwXSOD8E0i7KZn-EPnyo3HZu7kw.woff
80 ms
vt
33 ms
vt
130 ms
vt
124 ms
vt
122 ms
vt
124 ms
vt
125 ms
vt
126 ms
vt
128 ms
vt
127 ms
vt
127 ms
vt
125 ms
vt
127 ms
vt
128 ms
roundtrip.js
147 ms
onsharp.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
onsharp.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Page has valid source maps
onsharp.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Onsharp.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Onsharp.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
onsharp.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Onsharp. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: