Report Summary

  • 86

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    89% of other websites

  • 74

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 40% of websites

  • 58

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    20% of websites

  • 91

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    70% of websites

oome.org

上海曲德曲网络科技有限公司

Page Load Speed

10.3 sec in total

First Response

1.7 sec

Resources Loaded

8.3 sec

Page Rendered

303 ms

oome.org screenshot

About Website

Welcome to oome.org homepage info - get ready to check Oome best content right away, or after learning these important things about oome.org

曲德曲网络科技成立于2012年,皇冠登3出租专注移动互联网,提供免编程、一键制作App和小程序的SaaS服务。拥有百余行业模板,支持快速生成原生App,并提供运营管理、服务器等服务。累计服务60万+政企及创业者,覆盖国内外市场,与华为、中国铁路等企业合作,荣获多项科技创新大奖,上海市曲德曲网络科技有限公司。

Visit oome.org

Key Findings

We analyzed Oome.org page load time and found that the first response time was 1.7 sec and then it took 8.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 85% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

oome.org performance score

86

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.1 s

46/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value3.3 s

70/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value3.1 s

93/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value50 ms

100/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.001

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value3.2 s

94/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

www.oome.org

1709 ms

prettyPhoto.css

490 ms

pagenavi-css.css

493 ms

reset.css

493 ms

text.css

498 ms

Our browser made a total of 82 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 91% of them (75 requests) were addressed to the original Oome.org, 4% (3 requests) were made to Static.duoshuo.com and 2% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.7 sec) belongs to the original domain Oome.org.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 351.6 kB (51%)

Content Size

686.8 kB

After Optimization

335.2 kB

In fact, the total size of Oome.org main page is 686.8 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 35% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 239.0 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-81%

Potential reduce by 29.4 kB

  • Original 36.3 kB
  • After minification 31.9 kB
  • After compression 6.9 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 4.4 kB, which is 12% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 29.4 kB or 81% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-10%

Potential reduce by 24.7 kB

  • Original 239.0 kB
  • After minification 214.3 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Oome images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-63%

Potential reduce by 151.5 kB

  • Original 238.9 kB
  • After minification 196.0 kB
  • After compression 87.4 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 151.5 kB or 63% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-85%

Potential reduce by 146.1 kB

  • Original 172.7 kB
  • After minification 144.1 kB
  • After compression 26.6 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Oome.org needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 146.1 kB or 85% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 62 (77%)

Requests Now

81

After Optimization

19

The browser has sent 81 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Oome. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 38 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 11 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

oome.org accessibility score

74

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Tables and lists

These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Definition list items are not wrapped in <dl> elements

High

Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

oome.org best practices score

58

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

oome.org SEO score

91

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    N/A

  • Language Claimed

    ZH

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Oome.org can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else), while the claimed language is Chinese. Our system also found out that Oome.org main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Oome. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: