2.4 sec in total
191 ms
2.1 sec
117 ms
Click here to check amazing Open Remote content for United States. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about openremote.org
The 'Get Started', Wiki, and Forum for your free open source IoT platform. Protocols, Rules and Edge Gateway to build your own IoT device management platform.
Visit openremote.orgWe analyzed Openremote.org page load time and found that the first response time was 191 ms and then it took 2.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 40% of websites can load faster.
openremote.org performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value5.6 s
5/100
10%
Value7.0 s
6/100
25%
Value8.4 s
18/100
10%
Value210 ms
88/100
30%
Value0.158
74/100
15%
Value8.1 s
42/100
10%
191 ms
467 ms
249 ms
171 ms
175 ms
Our browser made a total of 49 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 86% of them (42 requests) were addressed to the original Openremote.org, 4% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com and 2% (1 request) were made to Openremote.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (650 ms) belongs to the original domain Openremote.org.
Page size can be reduced by 25.4 kB (50%)
51.2 kB
25.8 kB
In fact, the total size of Openremote.org main page is 51.2 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 25% of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 27.0 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 21.3 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 4.1 kB, which is 15% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 21.3 kB or 79% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 232 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Open Remote needs image optimization as it can save up to 232 B or 11% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 3.8 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 3.8 kB or 17% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 34 B
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Openremote.org needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 34 B or 21% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 33 (72%)
46
13
The browser has sent 46 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Open Remote. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 16 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 19 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
openremote.org
191 ms
OpenRemote
467 ms
master.css
249 ms
wiki-content.css
171 ms
tabs.css
175 ms
menu.css
171 ms
tables.css
173 ms
panels.css
174 ms
renderer-macros.css
254 ms
content-types.css
255 ms
information-macros.css
257 ms
layout-macros.css
255 ms
jquery.js
426 ms
jquery-compatibility.js
329 ms
jquery.dimensions.js
336 ms
atlassian.js
340 ms
image-effects.js
340 ms
breadcrumbs.js
340 ms
master.js
411 ms
menu.js
417 ms
PageNotification.js
430 ms
drop-down.js
431 ms
drop-down.css
431 ms
contentnamesearch.js
498 ms
contentnamesearch.css
500 ms
atlassian-effects.js
509 ms
combined.css
507 ms
layout-resources.action
597 ms
layout-resources.action
511 ms
effects.js
582 ms
site-2.5.css
87 ms
colors.css
90 ms
custom.css
91 ms
Twitter-icon-vector.png
267 ms
gplus-16.png
20 ms
OpenRemote%20iTunes%20Icon%20512x512.png
650 ms
OpenRemote-singleline-full-logo_400x62.png
195 ms
rss_16px.png
119 ms
linkedin-icon-16x16.png
116 ms
f_logo_16x16.png
115 ms
GetStartedButton_290x90.png
204 ms
Tablet2_256x331.png
566 ms
webfont.js
21 ms
ga.js
26 ms
css
26 ms
__utm.gif
25 ms
RdtK_xXgevlPvAurWOWs8w.ttf
30 ms
login.action
199 ms
print.css
86 ms
openremote.org accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
openremote.org best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
openremote.org SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
N/A
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Openremote.org can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Openremote.org main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
openremote.org
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Open Remote. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: