Tools & Wizards About Us
opinion.life screenshot

Report Summary

  • 41

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    60% of other websites

  • 77

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 45% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    81% of websites

  • 85

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    56% of websites

opinion.life

opinion.life - Market Research Firm - Your Opinion Matters

Page Load Speed

5.6 sec in total

First Response

1.6 sec

Resources Loaded

3.8 sec

Page Rendered

111 ms

opinion.life screenshot

About Website

Visit opinion.life now to see the best up-to-date Opinion content for Belgium and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about opinion.life

opinion.life is a international market research firm. Our approach looks to represent all cultural backgrounds rather than just standard demographic quotas

Visit opinion.life

Key Findings

We analyzed Opinion.life page load time and found that the first response time was 1.6 sec and then it took 3.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 65% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

opinion.life performance score

41

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.9 s

54/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value9.1 s

1/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value8.1 s

21/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value160 ms

93/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.572

12/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value8.3 s

40/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

opinion.life

1644 ms

styles.css

326 ms

style.css

149 ms

index.js

234 ms

index.js

251 ms

Our browser made a total of 33 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 42% of them (14 requests) were addressed to the original Opinion.life, 55% (18 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 3% (1 request) were made to Googletagmanager.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.6 sec) belongs to the original domain Opinion.life.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 562.3 kB (62%)

Content Size

911.7 kB

After Optimization

349.4 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Opinion.life main page is 911.7 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 401.5 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-82%

Potential reduce by 109.5 kB

  • Original 133.0 kB
  • After minification 132.1 kB
  • After compression 23.5 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 109.5 kB or 82% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-45%

Potential reduce by 160.4 kB

  • Original 356.2 kB
  • After minification 195.8 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Opinion needs image optimization as it can save up to 160.4 kB or 45% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-72%

Potential reduce by 287.6 kB

  • Original 401.5 kB
  • After minification 400.4 kB
  • After compression 113.9 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 287.6 kB or 72% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-23%

Potential reduce by 4.8 kB

  • Original 21.0 kB
  • After minification 21.0 kB
  • After compression 16.2 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Opinion.life needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 4.8 kB or 23% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 7 (54%)

Requests Now

13

After Optimization

6

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 13 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Opinion. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 8 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

opinion.life

opinion.life

1644 ms

styles.css

styles.css

326 ms

style.css

style.css

149 ms

index.js

index.js

234 ms

index.js

index.js

251 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

617 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

349 ms

scripts.min.js

scripts.min.js

995 ms

common.js

common.js

350 ms

scripts.js

scripts.js

349 ms

gtm.js

gtm.js

88 ms

ol.menulogo.png

ol.menulogo.png

269 ms

B2B_Group.png

B2B_Group.png

1000 ms

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtZ6Ew9.woff

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtZ6Ew9.woff

28 ms

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtZ6Ew-.ttf

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtZ6Ew-.ttf

34 ms

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtr6Ew9.woff

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtr6Ew9.woff

34 ms

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtr6Ew-.ttf

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtr6Ew-.ttf

33 ms

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCs16Ew9.woff

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCs16Ew9.woff

34 ms

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCs16Ew-.ttf

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCs16Ew-.ttf

33 ms

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCvr6Ew9.woff

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCvr6Ew9.woff

34 ms

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCvr6Ew-.ttf

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCvr6Ew-.ttf

50 ms

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtr6Uw9.woff

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtr6Uw9.woff

37 ms

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtr6Uw-.ttf

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtr6Uw-.ttf

51 ms

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCu170w9.woff

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCu170w9.woff

37 ms

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCu170w-.ttf

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCu170w-.ttf

50 ms

font

font

50 ms

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCuM70w-.ttf

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCuM70w-.ttf

52 ms

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCvr70w9.woff

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCvr70w9.woff

52 ms

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCvr70w-.ttf

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCvr70w-.ttf

52 ms

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCvC70w9.woff

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCvC70w9.woff

52 ms

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCvC70w-.ttf

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCvC70w-.ttf

50 ms

modules.ttf

modules.ttf

541 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

130 ms

Accessibility Review

opinion.life accessibility score

77

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

opinion.life best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

opinion.life SEO score

85

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Page is blocked from indexing

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Opinion.life can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Opinion.life main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

opinion.life

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Opinion. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: