Report Summary

  • 55

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    72% of other websites

  • 83

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 56% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    56% of websites

  • 100

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    95% of websites

option-signal.ru

Option Signal - Best signals for binary and turbo options

Page Load Speed

3.9 sec in total

First Response

626 ms

Resources Loaded

2.6 sec

Page Rendered

629 ms

option-signal.ru screenshot

About Website

Welcome to option-signal.ru homepage info - get ready to check Option Signal best content for Egypt right away, or after learning these important things about option-signal.ru

o-signals.com service has been operating for more than two years and is considered the best service for providing signals for binary options and FOREX. Our service provides signals for different time ...

Visit option-signal.ru

Key Findings

We analyzed Option-signal.ru page load time and found that the first response time was 626 ms and then it took 3.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 55% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

option-signal.ru performance score

55

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.6 s

32/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value3.6 s

61/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value6.2 s

43/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value590 ms

50/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.01

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value9.9 s

27/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

option-signal.ru

626 ms

700c602f133f4e2d262a406e592bcfd3_0.js

98 ms

bootstrap.min.css

354 ms

home_new.css

172 ms

animate.css

340 ms

Our browser made a total of 91 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 57% of them (52 requests) were addressed to the original Option-signal.ru, 13% (12 requests) were made to Vk.com and 5% (5 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.2 sec) belongs to the original domain Option-signal.ru.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 668.3 kB (27%)

Content Size

2.5 MB

After Optimization

1.8 MB

In fact, the total size of Option-signal.ru main page is 2.5 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.6 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-80%

Potential reduce by 61.8 kB

  • Original 76.9 kB
  • After minification 67.3 kB
  • After compression 15.1 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 9.7 kB, which is 13% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 61.8 kB or 80% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-5%

Potential reduce by 88.6 kB

  • Original 1.6 MB
  • After minification 1.6 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Option Signal images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-56%

Potential reduce by 221.4 kB

  • Original 393.2 kB
  • After minification 335.8 kB
  • After compression 171.9 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 221.4 kB or 56% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-85%

Potential reduce by 296.5 kB

  • Original 348.1 kB
  • After minification 308.1 kB
  • After compression 51.6 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Option-signal.ru needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 296.5 kB or 85% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 29 (35%)

Requests Now

83

After Optimization

54

The browser has sent 83 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Option Signal. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 18 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 13 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

option-signal.ru accessibility score

83

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

option-signal.ru best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript

SEO Factors

option-signal.ru SEO score

100

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    RU

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Option-signal.ru can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it does not match the claimed Russian language. Our system also found out that Option-signal.ru main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Option Signal. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: