Tools & Wizards About Us
optionaction.in screenshot

Report Summary

  • 46

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    65% of other websites

  • 94

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 83% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 100

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    94% of websites

optionaction.in

Best Options Trading Strategy Analysis Software | OptionAction

Page Load Speed

1.2 sec in total

First Response

52 ms

Resources Loaded

766 ms

Page Rendered

345 ms

optionaction.in screenshot

About Website

Welcome to optionaction.in homepage info - get ready to check Option Action best content for India right away, or after learning these important things about optionaction.in

OptionAction lets you to build and analyze option strategies using latest stock quotes, options chains, greeks (delta, gamma, theta ) and implied volatility.We also offer Expected Move, payoff graph, ...

Visit optionaction.in

Key Findings

We analyzed Optionaction.in page load time and found that the first response time was 52 ms and then it took 1.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 25% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

optionaction.in performance score

46

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value6.4 s

2/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value8.1 s

2/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value6.4 s

40/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value260 ms

83/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.033

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value12.0 s

16/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

optionaction.in

52 ms

css

41 ms

bootstrap.min.css

47 ms

font-awesome.min.css

44 ms

animate.min.css

59 ms

Our browser made a total of 49 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 51% of them (25 requests) were addressed to the original Optionaction.in, 27% (13 requests) were made to Embed.tawk.to and 6% (3 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (527 ms) relates to the external source Learn.febinars.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 443.5 kB (27%)

Content Size

1.6 MB

After Optimization

1.2 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Optionaction.in main page is 1.6 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 853.9 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-88%

Potential reduce by 41.4 kB

  • Original 47.0 kB
  • After minification 21.3 kB
  • After compression 5.5 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 25.6 kB, which is 55% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 41.4 kB or 88% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-3%

Potential reduce by 21.8 kB

  • Original 853.9 kB
  • After minification 832.1 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Option Action images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-35%

Potential reduce by 174.8 kB

  • Original 494.9 kB
  • After minification 486.2 kB
  • After compression 320.1 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 174.8 kB or 35% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-85%

Potential reduce by 205.5 kB

  • Original 241.9 kB
  • After minification 235.1 kB
  • After compression 36.4 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Optionaction.in needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 205.5 kB or 85% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 34 (81%)

Requests Now

42

After Optimization

8

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 42 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Option Action. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 26 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 10 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

optionaction.in

optionaction.in

52 ms

css

css

41 ms

bootstrap.min.css

bootstrap.min.css

47 ms

font-awesome.min.css

font-awesome.min.css

44 ms

animate.min.css

animate.min.css

59 ms

owl.carousel.css

owl.carousel.css

33 ms

owl.transitions.css

owl.transitions.css

33 ms

prettyPhoto.css

prettyPhoto.css

45 ms

main.css

main.css

61 ms

modal_1.css

modal_1.css

56 ms

event-banner-desktop-1030X120.png

event-banner-desktop-1030X120.png

500 ms

jquery.js

jquery.js

109 ms

bootstrap.min.js

bootstrap.min.js

58 ms

js

js

109 ms

owl.carousel.min.js

owl.carousel.min.js

74 ms

mousescroll.js

mousescroll.js

69 ms

smoothscroll.js

smoothscroll.js

69 ms

jquery.prettyPhoto.js

jquery.prettyPhoto.js

70 ms

jquery.isotope.min.js

jquery.isotope.min.js

72 ms

jquery.inview.min.js

jquery.inview.min.js

105 ms

wow.min.js

wow.min.js

106 ms

main.js

main.js

105 ms

OptionAction.png

OptionAction.png

106 ms

OA.png

OA.png

225 ms

OAWeb.png

OAWeb.png

225 ms

cta2-img.png

cta2-img.png

224 ms

event-banner-mobile-300X300.png

event-banner-mobile-300X300.png

527 ms

css

css

19 ms

cta2-bg.jpg

cta2-bg.jpg

121 ms

zYXgKVElMYYaJe8bpLHnCwDKhdHeEA.ttf

zYXgKVElMYYaJe8bpLHnCwDKhdHeEA.ttf

131 ms

zYX9KVElMYYaJe8bpLHnCwDKjXr8AIFscQ.ttf

zYX9KVElMYYaJe8bpLHnCwDKjXr8AIFscQ.ttf

149 ms

zYX9KVElMYYaJe8bpLHnCwDKjQ76AIFscQ.ttf

zYX9KVElMYYaJe8bpLHnCwDKjQ76AIFscQ.ttf

163 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

74 ms

default

default

140 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

30 ms

collect

collect

13 ms

js

js

97 ms

twk-arr-find-polyfill.js

twk-arr-find-polyfill.js

69 ms

twk-object-values-polyfill.js

twk-object-values-polyfill.js

63 ms

twk-event-polyfill.js

twk-event-polyfill.js

80 ms

twk-entries-polyfill.js

twk-entries-polyfill.js

102 ms

twk-iterator-polyfill.js

twk-iterator-polyfill.js

80 ms

twk-promise-polyfill.js

twk-promise-polyfill.js

74 ms

twk-main.js

twk-main.js

82 ms

twk-vendor.js

twk-vendor.js

91 ms

twk-chunk-vendors.js

twk-chunk-vendors.js

100 ms

twk-chunk-common.js

twk-chunk-common.js

121 ms

twk-runtime.js

twk-runtime.js

97 ms

twk-app.js

twk-app.js

96 ms

Accessibility Review

optionaction.in accessibility score

94

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

optionaction.in best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

optionaction.in SEO score

100

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Optionaction.in can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Optionaction.in main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

optionaction.in

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Option Action. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: