12.4 sec in total
4.5 sec
7.5 sec
408 ms
Visit ormantik.com now to see the best up-to-date Ormantik content for Turkey and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about ormantik.com
Türkiye'deki Tüm Orman Fakültesi öğrencileri ve mezunlarının bir araya gelip ders notu, çıkmış sorular, tartışmalar, tecrübe paylaşımlarının yapıldığı forum platformudur.
Visit ormantik.comWe analyzed Ormantik.com page load time and found that the first response time was 4.5 sec and then it took 7.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 85% of websites can load faster.
ormantik.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.7 s
12/100
10%
Value7.2 s
5/100
25%
Value7.2 s
30/100
10%
Value480 ms
59/100
30%
Value0.379
28/100
15%
Value11.6 s
18/100
10%
4512 ms
264 ms
267 ms
533 ms
275 ms
Our browser made a total of 61 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 72% of them (44 requests) were addressed to the original Ormantik.com, 8% (5 requests) were made to Google.com and 8% (5 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (4.5 sec) belongs to the original domain Ormantik.com.
Page size can be reduced by 1.0 MB (60%)
1.7 MB
671.3 kB
In fact, the total size of Ormantik.com main page is 1.7 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 962.0 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 92.5 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 92.5 kB or 82% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 42.1 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Ormantik needs image optimization as it can save up to 42.1 kB or 17% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 664.6 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 664.6 kB or 69% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 223.0 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Ormantik.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 223.0 kB or 60% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 39 (72%)
54
15
The browser has sent 54 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Ormantik. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 29 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 12 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
www.ormantik.com
4512 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
264 ms
buttons.min.css
267 ms
dashicons.min.css
533 ms
mediaelementplayer.min.css
275 ms
wp-mediaelement.css
294 ms
media-views.min.css
396 ms
imgareaselect.css
401 ms
admin-ajax.php
3274 ms
utils.min.js
437 ms
jquery.js
785 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
527 ms
plupload.full.min.js
1164 ms
style.css
662 ms
font-awesome.min.css
38 ms
jquery.1.10.2.min.js
799 ms
script.js
1055 ms
api.js
37 ms
style_alt.css
135 ms
api.js
16 ms
underscore.min.js
145 ms
shortcode.min.js
146 ms
backbone.min.js
145 ms
wp-util.min.js
158 ms
wp-backbone.min.js
277 ms
media-models.min.js
278 ms
wp-plupload.min.js
280 ms
core.min.js
303 ms
widget.min.js
401 ms
mouse.min.js
413 ms
sortable.min.js
419 ms
mediaelement-and-player.min.js
418 ms
wp-mediaelement.js
315 ms
media-views.min.js
674 ms
media-editor.min.js
407 ms
media-audiovideo.min.js
416 ms
wp-embed.min.js
544 ms
css
29 ms
~text
130 ms
logo.png
169 ms
slayt2.jpg
632 ms
slayt1-1.jpg
795 ms
profil.jpg
169 ms
mehmet-150x150.jpg
628 ms
mehmet-300x300.jpg
631 ms
10712500_10154773322025710_8030325439807134062_o-300x300.jpg
628 ms
rss.png
625 ms
engintasarim.png
628 ms
cJZKeOuBrn4kERxqtaUH3aCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
85 ms
MTP_ySUJH_bn48VBG8sNSonF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf
85 ms
k3k702ZOKiLJc3WVjuplzInF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf
87 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
37 ms
recaptcha__en.js
421 ms
overlay.png
163 ms
anchor
26 ms
styles__ltr.css
7 ms
-FHGegChvKELgmHNPF97Aj33qC9PBXl7UyexHItfpAU.js
11 ms
webworker.js
54 ms
logo_48.png
8 ms
zN7GBFwfMP4uA6AR0HCoLQ.ttf
59 ms
RxZJdnzeo3R5zSexge8UUaCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
61 ms
ormantik.com accessibility score
ARIA
These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
button, link, and menuitem elements do not have accessible names.
[aria-*] attributes do not have valid values
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
ormantik.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Page has valid source maps
ormantik.com SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
TR
N/A
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Ormantik.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Turkish is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Ormantik.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
ormantik.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Ormantik. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: