5 sec in total
111 ms
2.1 sec
2.8 sec
Visit osceolafence.net now to see the best up-to-date Osceola Fence content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about osceolafence.net
Chicago Fence Company. Fence Installation and repair. Design and Fabrication. High quality at the best price. Call (773) 278-4762
Visit osceolafence.netWe analyzed Osceolafence.net page load time and found that the first response time was 111 ms and then it took 4.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 70% of websites can load faster.
osceolafence.net performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.9 s
24/100
10%
Value27.6 s
0/100
25%
Value18.2 s
0/100
10%
Value6,390 ms
0/100
30%
Value0.044
99/100
15%
Value37.3 s
0/100
10%
111 ms
237 ms
111 ms
127 ms
137 ms
Our browser made a total of 147 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 68% of them (100 requests) were addressed to the original Osceolafence.net, 7% (10 requests) were made to Lh3.googleusercontent.com and 4% (6 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.2 sec) belongs to the original domain Osceolafence.net.
Page size can be reduced by 957.3 kB (19%)
5.1 MB
4.1 MB
In fact, the total size of Osceolafence.net main page is 5.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 80% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 3.7 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 472.7 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 472.7 kB or 89% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 384.8 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Osceola Fence images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 42.5 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 57.3 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Osceolafence.net needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 57.3 kB or 22% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 70 (52%)
135
65
The browser has sent 135 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Osceola Fence. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 49 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 23 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
osceolafence.net
111 ms
osceolafence.net
237 ms
style.min.css
111 ms
main.min.css
127 ms
elementor-icons.min.css
137 ms
frontend.min.css
164 ms
swiper.min.css
121 ms
frontend.min.css
191 ms
all.min.css
139 ms
v4-shims.min.css
143 ms
wpforms-base.min.css
173 ms
ekiticons.css
184 ms
front.min.css
175 ms
widget-styles.css
257 ms
responsive.css
189 ms
general.min.css
277 ms
css
51 ms
fontawesome.min.css
221 ms
solid.min.css
224 ms
regular.min.css
238 ms
brands.min.css
227 ms
jquery.min.js
287 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
285 ms
v4-shims.min.js
284 ms
front.min.js
401 ms
css2
72 ms
js
136 ms
api.js
74 ms
slider.css
376 ms
trustindex-google-widget.css
375 ms
animations.min.css
377 ms
menu.min.js
376 ms
general.min.js
378 ms
frontend-script.js
379 ms
widget-scripts.js
381 ms
new-tab.js
380 ms
lazyload.min.js
381 ms
instantpage.js
382 ms
lazySizesConfig.js
382 ms
ls.unveilhooks.min.js
38 ms
ls.bgset.min.js
48 ms
lazysizes.min.js
51 ms
image.js
381 ms
loader.js
29 ms
jquery.smartmenus.min.js
467 ms
imagesloaded.min.js
418 ms
webpack-pro.runtime.min.js
403 ms
webpack.runtime.min.js
389 ms
frontend-modules.min.js
378 ms
wp-polyfill-inert.min.js
362 ms
regenerator-runtime.min.js
359 ms
wp-polyfill.min.js
357 ms
hooks.min.js
328 ms
i18n.min.js
326 ms
frontend.min.js
315 ms
waypoints.min.js
313 ms
core.min.js
397 ms
frontend.min.js
455 ms
elements-handlers.min.js
376 ms
animate-circle.min.js
373 ms
elementor.js
441 ms
underscore.min.js
405 ms
wp-util.min.js
393 ms
frontend.min.js
393 ms
gtm.js
111 ms
jquery.validate.min.js
351 ms
jquery.inputmask.min.js
411 ms
mailcheck.min.js
409 ms
punycode.min.js
410 ms
utils.min.js
409 ms
wpforms.min.js
407 ms
output-300x222.png
407 ms
logotype-osceola-for-wrought-iron-balcony-railing-chicago-300x300.jpg
532 ms
Fencin-Services-Prospect-Heights.png
1233 ms
chicago-illinois-fence-company-1.jpg
730 ms
Chicago-Fence-Company-1.jpg
812 ms
fencing-companies-chicago.jpg
528 ms
Chicago-Fences-Company-Iron.jpg
530 ms
Chicago-Fence-Company-Iron.jpg
640 ms
Chicago-Fencing-Company-Iron.jpg
729 ms
Chicago-Fencing-Company-Chain-Link.jpg
729 ms
Chicago-Fence-Company-Chain-Link.jpg
810 ms
Chicago-Fences-Company-Chain-Link.jpg
811 ms
Chicago-Fence-Company-Wood.jpg
810 ms
Chicago-Fences-Company-Wood.jpg
790 ms
Chicago-Fencing-Company-Wood.jpg
900 ms
Chicago-Fence-Company-Vinyl.jpg
901 ms
Chicago-Fences-Company-Vinyl.jpg
885 ms
Chicago-Fencing-Company-Vinyl.jpg
897 ms
Chicago-Fences-Company-Composite.jpg
898 ms
Chicago-Fence-Company-Composite.jpg
981 ms
Chicago-Fencing-Company-Composite.jpg
937 ms
font
434 ms
fa-solid-900.woff
1004 ms
font
522 ms
font
631 ms
font
631 ms
recaptcha__en.js
608 ms
fa-regular-400.woff
844 ms
fa-brands-400.woff
949 ms
Chicago-Fences-Company-Railings.jpg
871 ms
Chicago-Fence-Company-Railings.jpg
829 ms
Chicago-Fencing-Company-Railings.jpg
936 ms
Chicago-Fence-Company-Automatic.jpg
939 ms
Chicago-Fences-Company-Automatic.jpg
936 ms
Chicago-Fencing-Company-Automatic.jpg
940 ms
js
374 ms
f.svg
246 ms
Chicago-Fences-Company-Camera.jpg
808 ms
h.svg
252 ms
icon.svg
253 ms
Chicago-Fence-Company-Camera.jpg
811 ms
Chicago-Fencing-Company-Camera.jpg
808 ms
Chicago-Fence-Company-Bollards.jpg
854 ms
Chicago-Fencing-Company-Bollards.jpg
877 ms
font
319 ms
font
434 ms
eicons.woff
901 ms
ACg8ocKDeUSEsHLpUywDZ1nYByTOeSAN9vtsTLY1UX9i3u1J=s120-c-rp-mo-br100
359 ms
eagle-logo-blank-1-300x106.png
615 ms
dks-doorking-logo-2017.png
617 ms
Osceola-Commercial-Security-Cameras-Chicago-4-Locinox.png
662 ms
TS-Distributors_Logo-300x50.png
615 ms
aalogo.gif
610 ms
apollogateopeners-logo-300x100.png
616 ms
wexler_logo.png
301 ms
thumbtack.png
636 ms
Osceola-Fence-Company-Logo.jpg
654 ms
Illinois-Fence-Contractor-164x300.png
661 ms
ALV-UjWwjRDBZRn_Oj7sv6UlgE3LxLKR9DsOijo3yg9lSWXodGk=s120-c-rp-mo-br100
696 ms
ALV-UjVWper0rSnts2Pc2tb5a4KS1Mul8lToGw3sjKzeC1FyBpg=s120-c-rp-mo-br100
673 ms
ACg8ocK0xexs6rHTk5z8We__02E181R9uGytS_gXuQDlI321=s120-c-rp-mo-br100
541 ms
ALV-UjX_0wUnaGg1T2TbcbYF5w5dlqFSDzGub7mwzkyGDnRosKua=s120-c-rp-mo-ba4-br100
542 ms
ACg8ocIYQz6_Fy2syO2gsBWgGWC_KR873P2NKUsp6dlUWvhz=s120-c-rp-mo-br100
420 ms
ACg8ocI7MUW4KDXK_dV_SWdJ8gIXak3g8Km9nzPRRZYC-4AE=s120-c-rp-mo-br100
428 ms
ACg8ocLJQlhBzvWhcKyuHfoUc64A5lrCn0vXNT2krUWN5pFA=s120-c-rp-mo-br100
617 ms
ACg8ocJ4ObVx9qT2UIOq-jxYtNZF2vvIMxPSwlfLOalUwvZm=s120-c-rp-mo-br100
622 ms
ACg8ocJGeAOLsu5JC65XFeylFyBImXJVz2XsuD71wBvi1J7h=s120-c-rp-mo-br100
610 ms
delta-screw-logo.png
658 ms
Bufftech-logo-1-300x145.jpg
542 ms
BLD_Logo-300x94.png
635 ms
google.png
642 ms
yelp.png
608 ms
logo.svg
121 ms
angieslist.png
297 ms
embed
333 ms
js
119 ms
osceolafence.net accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
osceolafence.net best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Page has valid source maps
osceolafence.net SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Osceolafence.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Osceolafence.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
osceolafence.net
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Osceola Fence. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: