15.2 sec in total
192 ms
3.7 sec
11.2 sec
Visit osceolafence.net now to see the best up-to-date Osceola Fence content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about osceolafence.net
We are a Chicago Fence Company experienced in residential and commercial fence installation. Iron, Wood, & Custom Fences. Free Quote!
Visit osceolafence.netWe analyzed Osceolafence.net page load time and found that the first response time was 192 ms and then it took 15 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 90% of websites can load faster.
osceolafence.net performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.6 s
32/100
10%
Value3.6 s
61/100
25%
Value12.5 s
3/100
10%
Value17,230 ms
0/100
30%
Value0.042
99/100
15%
Value32.3 s
0/100
10%
192 ms
1326 ms
53 ms
172 ms
375 ms
Our browser made a total of 119 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 50% of them (59 requests) were addressed to the original Osceolafence.net, 32% (38 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 7% (8 requests) were made to Maps.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.6 sec) belongs to the original domain Osceolafence.net.
Page size can be reduced by 724.4 kB (5%)
13.8 MB
13.1 MB
In fact, the total size of Osceolafence.net main page is 13.8 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. Only a small number of websites need less resources to load. Images take 13.1 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 235.0 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 235.0 kB or 88% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 238.0 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Osceola Fence images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 91.3 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 91.3 kB or 35% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 160.1 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Osceolafence.net needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 160.1 kB or 99% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 16 (22%)
72
56
The browser has sent 72 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Osceola Fence. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 14 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 4 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
osceolafence.net
192 ms
osceolafence.net
1326 ms
css
53 ms
autoptimize_f552e8421ce652daeb5cf63a4e8e2921.css
172 ms
jquery.min.js
375 ms
api.js
72 ms
autoptimize_0ddc85bf3363284295753b09452f229d.js
594 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
267 ms
analytics.js
264 ms
Osceola-Fence-Company-Logo.jpg
288 ms
logo-1.png
330 ms
Service-Quality-Variety.jpg
330 ms
Chicago-Illinois-Fence-Company.jpg
599 ms
Chicago-Fence-Company-1.jpg
912 ms
fencing-companies-chicago.jpg
702 ms
Chicago-Fencing-Company-Iron-1-scaled.jpg
926 ms
Chicago-Fences-Company-Iron-1.jpg
850 ms
Chicago-Fence-Company-Iron-1.jpg
703 ms
Chicago-Fencing-Company-Iron.jpg
723 ms
Chicago-Fence-Company-Iron.jpg
851 ms
Chicago-Fences-Company-Iron-scaled.jpg
1021 ms
Chicago-Fencing-Company-Wood.jpg
846 ms
Chicago-Fences-Company-Wood-scaled.jpg
927 ms
Chicago-Fence-Company-Wood-scaled.jpg
1118 ms
Chicago-Fence-Company-Vinyl-scaled.jpg
1013 ms
Chicago-Fences-Company-Vinyl.jpg
1016 ms
Chicago-Fencing-Company-Vinyl.jpg
1014 ms
Chicago-Fencing-Company-Composite-scaled.jpg
1018 ms
Chicago-Fence-Company-Composite-scaled.jpg
1021 ms
Chicago-Fences-Company-Composite-scaled.jpg
1216 ms
Chicago-Fences-Company-Railings-scaled.jpg
1243 ms
Chicago-Fence-Company-Railings-scaled.jpg
1114 ms
Chicago-Fencing-Company-Railings.jpg
1161 ms
Chicago-Fencing-Company-Automatic-scaled.jpg
1158 ms
Chicago-Fences-Company-Automatic-scaled.jpg
1246 ms
Chicago-Fence-Company-Automatic-scaled.jpg
1565 ms
Chicago-Fences-Company-Camera.jpg
1161 ms
Chicago-Fence-Company-Camera.jpg
1239 ms
Chicago-Fencing-Company-Camera.jpg
1238 ms
Chicago-Fences-Company-Bollards.jpg
1441 ms
Chicago-Fence-Company-Bollards.jpg
1439 ms
Chicago-Fencing-Company-Bollards.jpg
1477 ms
The-Importance-Of-High-Quality-Fencing-Products-300x140.jpg
1277 ms
Tips-to-Choose-a-Fence-Contractor-300x225.jpg
1273 ms
maps
106 ms
S6uyw4BMUTPHjx4wWw.ttf
140 ms
S6u9w4BMUTPHh7USSwiPHA.ttf
220 ms
S6u8w4BMUTPHh30AXC-v.ttf
296 ms
S6u9w4BMUTPHh6UVSwiPHA.ttf
388 ms
S6u9w4BMUTPHh50XSwiPHA.ttf
387 ms
fa-solid-900.woff
1293 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCu173w5aX8.ttf
386 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCuM73w5aX8.ttf
386 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCvr73w5aX8.ttf
387 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCvC73w5aX8.ttf
386 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtZ6Hw5aX8.ttf
396 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtr6Hw5aX8.ttf
402 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCs16Hw5aX8.ttf
402 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCvr6Hw5aX8.ttf
395 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtr6Xw5aX8.ttf
395 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc9.ttf
394 ms
KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxP.ttf
490 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmSU5fBBc9.ttf
490 ms
KFOkCnqEu92Fr1MmgVxIIzc.ttf
490 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmWUlfBBc9.ttf
490 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmYUtfBBc9.ttf
489 ms
mFTvWacfw6zH4dthXcyms1lPpC8I_b0juU0566fV.ttf
490 ms
mFTiWacfw6zH4dthXcyms1lPpC8I_b0juU0xGITFB7xD.ttf
524 ms
mFTiWacfw6zH4dthXcyms1lPpC8I_b0juU0xQIXFB7xD.ttf
521 ms
mFTiWacfw6zH4dthXcyms1lPpC8I_b0juU0xJIbFB7xD.ttf
522 ms
mFThWacfw6zH4dthXcyms1lPpC8I_b0juU0xiJfSIJw.ttf
522 ms
mFTiWacfw6zH4dthXcyms1lPpC8I_b0juU0xNIPFB7xD.ttf
521 ms
mFTiWacfw6zH4dthXcyms1lPpC8I_b0juU0xUILFB7xD.ttf
522 ms
mFTiWacfw6zH4dthXcyms1lPpC8I_b0juU0xTIHFB7xD.ttf
537 ms
mFTiWacfw6zH4dthXcyms1lPpC8I_b0juU0xaIDFB7xD.ttf
536 ms
-W__XJnvUD7dzB2KYNoY.ttf
538 ms
-W_8XJnvUD7dzB2Ck_kIaWMr.ttf
535 ms
-W_8XJnvUD7dzB2Cy_gIaWMr.ttf
535 ms
-W_8XJnvUD7dzB2Cr_sIaWMr.ttf
535 ms
-W_9XJnvUD7dzB2CA-ofTkM.ttf
537 ms
-W_8XJnvUD7dzB2Cv_4IaWMr.ttf
547 ms
-W_8XJnvUD7dzB2C2_8IaWMr.ttf
540 ms
recaptcha__en.js
469 ms
embed
417 ms
collect
21 ms
fa-solid-900.woff
1174 ms
fa-regular-400.woff
1156 ms
fa-regular-400.woff
1156 ms
collect
393 ms
-W_8XJnvUD7dzB2Cx_wIaWMr.ttf
337 ms
-W_8XJnvUD7dzB2C4_0IaWMr.ttf
272 ms
fa-brands-400.woff
987 ms
js
212 ms
fa-brands-400.woff
883 ms
Benefits-of-Ornamental-Fences-Chicago-300x217.jpg
861 ms
Bufftech-logo-1-250x121.jpg
987 ms
ga-audiences
183 ms
aalogo-250x123.gif
862 ms
wexler_logo.png
864 ms
TS-Distributors_Logo-250x41.png
805 ms
dks-doorking-logo-2017.png
801 ms
eagle-logo-blank-1-300x106-250x88.png
783 ms
BLD_Logo-250x78.png
703 ms
LOCINOX_LOGO_250x56px-250x64.png
701 ms
delta-screw-logo.png
699 ms
apollogateopeners-logo-250x83.png
695 ms
Illinois-Fence-Contractor-164x300.png
697 ms
gen_204
41 ms
fallback
52 ms
init_embed.js
133 ms
fallback__ltr.css
38 ms
css
19 ms
logo_48.png
9 ms
common.js
150 ms
util.js
231 ms
map.js
207 ms
overlay.js
131 ms
onion.js
112 ms
search_impl.js
112 ms
osceolafence.net accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
Form elements do not have associated labels
Links do not have a discernible name
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
osceolafence.net best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript
osceolafence.net SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Osceolafence.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Osceolafence.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
osceolafence.net
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Osceola Fence. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: