Tools & Wizards About Us
osmaps.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 40

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    60% of other websites

  • 98

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 94% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    36% of websites

  • 92

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    75% of websites

osmaps.com

Online maps & routes for walking, cycling and running | OS Maps

Page Load Speed

1 sec in total

First Response

126 ms

Resources Loaded

810 ms

Page Rendered

67 ms

osmaps.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to osmaps.com homepage info - get ready to check OS Maps best content for United Kingdom right away, or after learning these important things about osmaps.com

Get inspired & explore the outdoors with unlimited maps across multiple devices. Find & create routes for walking, hiking, running, cycling & more. Try it for free.

Visit osmaps.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Osmaps.com page load time and found that the first response time was 126 ms and then it took 877 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 15% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

osmaps.com performance score

40

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value1.6 s

93/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value5.6 s

18/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value6.6 s

37/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,260 ms

19/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.073

96/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value10.8 s

22/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

osmaps.com

126 ms

browser-not-supported

97 ms

71df41105dbc1d19.css

12 ms

1dd3208c-5a99c0fb61cc4641.js

20 ms

1053-bd0bc4b72ae13330.js

21 ms

Our browser made a total of 37 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that all of those requests were addressed to Osmaps.com and no external sources were called. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (280 ms) belongs to the original domain Osmaps.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 23.9 kB (19%)

Content Size

126.7 kB

After Optimization

102.8 kB

  • HTML
  • Images

In fact, the total size of Osmaps.com main page is 126.7 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 97.1 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-81%

Potential reduce by 23.9 kB

  • Original 29.7 kB
  • After minification 29.7 kB
  • After compression 5.7 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 23.9 kB or 81% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 0 B

  • Original 97.1 kB
  • After minification 97.1 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. OS Maps images are well optimized though.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 22 (79%)

Requests Now

28

After Optimization

6

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 28 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of OS Maps. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 23 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

osmaps.com

osmaps.com

126 ms

browser-not-supported

browser-not-supported

97 ms

71df41105dbc1d19.css

71df41105dbc1d19.css

12 ms

1dd3208c-5a99c0fb61cc4641.js

1dd3208c-5a99c0fb61cc4641.js

20 ms

1053-bd0bc4b72ae13330.js

1053-bd0bc4b72ae13330.js

21 ms

main-app-a3d31ecf5977f8ae.js

main-app-a3d31ecf5977f8ae.js

20 ms

7742-aff1ee3ca2d51387.js

7742-aff1ee3ca2d51387.js

30 ms

4770-c10a154f5fa78d6a.js

4770-c10a154f5fa78d6a.js

19 ms

836-b28f6557f814d1dd.js

836-b28f6557f814d1dd.js

31 ms

6839-b071212430703428.js

6839-b071212430703428.js

40 ms

563-6072e60db316fc3a.js

563-6072e60db316fc3a.js

33 ms

9141-b6e4d08709ab0949.js

9141-b6e4d08709ab0949.js

31 ms

4175-7917a2843ab24691.js

4175-7917a2843ab24691.js

32 ms

4760-3623ac3a6dbe41db.js

4760-3623ac3a6dbe41db.js

33 ms

global-error-6131ceda48a3bab7.js

global-error-6131ceda48a3bab7.js

37 ms

7779-7f052e7269743c46.js

7779-7f052e7269743c46.js

38 ms

not-found-f52ccdfeabb509dd.js

not-found-f52ccdfeabb509dd.js

33 ms

9954-5b36c799eb5f8d05.js

9954-5b36c799eb5f8d05.js

42 ms

3807-a11089f30580cefe.js

3807-a11089f30580cefe.js

39 ms

90-847f6aa14d3388eb.js

90-847f6aa14d3388eb.js

39 ms

6117-756fd5cfdc06e5b2.js

6117-756fd5cfdc06e5b2.js

44 ms

layout-06d00e19d26b6474.js

layout-06d00e19d26b6474.js

45 ms

error-801cf7cc261ccf37.js

error-801cf7cc261ccf37.js

43 ms

page-7eb5082ac983aeda.js

page-7eb5082ac983aeda.js

44 ms

polyfills-c67a75d1b6f99dc8.js

polyfills-c67a75d1b6f99dc8.js

45 ms

webpack-79962112c5be45ec.js

webpack-79962112c5be45ec.js

79 ms

edge.svg

edge.svg

16 ms

chrome.svg

chrome.svg

13 ms

image

image

174 ms

opera.svg

opera.svg

11 ms

1086c088cca6aa7b-s.p.otf

1086c088cca6aa7b-s.p.otf

148 ms

61000807035c1c2d-s.p.otf

61000807035c1c2d-s.p.otf

145 ms

86475efce3cf602c-s.p.otf

86475efce3cf602c-s.p.otf

162 ms

571113512d3970fc-s.p.otf

571113512d3970fc-s.p.otf

149 ms

6162eac7cd1b0bad-s.p.otf

6162eac7cd1b0bad-s.p.otf

132 ms

d04adc617b83d9f7-s.p.otf

d04adc617b83d9f7-s.p.otf

178 ms

ba225f943ca60fe5-s.p.otf

ba225f943ca60fe5-s.p.otf

280 ms

Accessibility Review

osmaps.com accessibility score

98

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Best Practices

osmaps.com best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Requests the geolocation permission on page load

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript

SEO Factors

osmaps.com SEO score

92

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

robots.txt is not valid

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Osmaps.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Osmaps.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

osmaps.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of OS Maps. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: