2.6 sec in total
43 ms
2.2 sec
341 ms
Click here to check amazing OSTERING content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about ostering.com
{OSTERIA}{RUNNING}
Visit ostering.comWe analyzed Ostering.com page load time and found that the first response time was 43 ms and then it took 2.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 45% of websites can load faster.
ostering.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.9 s
52/100
10%
Value5.1 s
26/100
25%
Value3.8 s
84/100
10%
Value210 ms
89/100
30%
Value0.097
90/100
15%
Value6.5 s
58/100
10%
43 ms
505 ms
62 ms
169 ms
50 ms
Our browser made a total of 36 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 53% of them (19 requests) were addressed to the original Ostering.com, 14% (5 requests) were made to Google.com and 6% (2 requests) were made to Cdnjs.cloudflare.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.6 sec) belongs to the original domain Ostering.com.
Page size can be reduced by 695.0 kB (23%)
3.1 MB
2.4 MB
In fact, the total size of Ostering.com main page is 3.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 35% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 2.6 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 38.4 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 38.4 kB or 38% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 537.4 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, OSTERING needs image optimization as it can save up to 537.4 kB or 21% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 112.2 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 112.2 kB or 35% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 7.0 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Ostering.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 7.0 kB or 46% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 12 (35%)
34
22
The browser has sent 34 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of OSTERING. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 7 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 7 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
ostering.com
43 ms
ostering.com
505 ms
sawarabigothic.css
62 ms
atom-one-dark.min.css
169 ms
pure-min.css
50 ms
grids-responsive-min.css
66 ms
style.css
437 ms
games_small.jpg
494 ms
miroverse_threat_modeling_with_eop.png
660 ms
appsec_teaser.png
763 ms
capec_stride_mapping_thumbnail.png
653 ms
top_ten_blog_teaser.jpg
686 ms
sweep.jpg
991 ms
python.jpg
886 ms
key-96233_1920.jpg
961 ms
kerberos_myth-01.png
1136 ms
brett3.png
571 ms
digital_signature.jpg
1063 ms
ssl.jpg
1233 ms
ThreeBrassMonkeys.jpg
1363 ms
highlight.min.js
20 ms
script.js
1142 ms
cissp.png
1185 ms
csslp.png
1639 ms
ccsp.png
1104 ms
cse.js
70 ms
analytics.js
18 ms
collect
13 ms
collect
33 ms
js
72 ms
cse_element__en.js
30 ms
default+en.css
60 ms
default.css
64 ms
async-ads.js
26 ms
branding.png
23 ms
clear.png
12 ms
ostering.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
ostering.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
ostering.com SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Ostering.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Ostering.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
ostering.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of OSTERING. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: