Tools & Wizards About Us
owl.link screenshot

Report Summary

  • 81

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    86% of other websites

  • 93

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 80% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    80% of websites

  • 85

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    55% of websites

owl.link

Owl Link | The only bio link that stays forever

Page Load Speed

910 ms in total

First Response

73 ms

Resources Loaded

310 ms

Page Rendered

527 ms

owl.link screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Owl content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about owl.link

Showcase your collectibles, NFTs, and social profiles. Everything is in one place.

Visit owl.link

Key Findings

We analyzed Owl.link page load time and found that the first response time was 73 ms and then it took 837 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 15% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

owl.link performance score

81

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.2 s

79/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value3.4 s

68/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value2.2 s

99/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value310 ms

78/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.011

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value5.2 s

74/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

owl.link

73 ms

owl.link

82 ms

script.js

97 ms

082d56c1ea1afebe.css

15 ms

0e17d2e916d6a453.css

25 ms

Our browser made a total of 29 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 72% of them (21 requests) were addressed to the original Owl.link, 21% (6 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 3% (1 request) were made to Quiet-actor.owl.link. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (97 ms) relates to the external source Quiet-actor.owl.link.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 34.9 kB (73%)

Content Size

47.7 kB

After Optimization

12.8 kB

  • HTML
  • JavaScript

In fact, the total size of Owl.link main page is 47.7 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 35% of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 47.7 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-73%

Potential reduce by 34.9 kB

  • Original 47.7 kB
  • After minification 47.4 kB
  • After compression 12.8 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 34.9 kB or 73% of the original size.

JavaScript Optimization

-70%

Potential reduce by 19 B

  • Original 27 B
  • After minification 8 B
  • After compression 8 B

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 19 B or 70% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 13 (62%)

Requests Now

21

After Optimization

8

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 21 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Owl. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 14 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

owl.link

owl.link

73 ms

owl.link

owl.link

82 ms

script.js

script.js

97 ms

082d56c1ea1afebe.css

082d56c1ea1afebe.css

15 ms

0e17d2e916d6a453.css

0e17d2e916d6a453.css

25 ms

polyfills-5cd94c89d3acac5f.js

polyfills-5cd94c89d3acac5f.js

32 ms

webpack-61748db97b193133.js

webpack-61748db97b193133.js

28 ms

framework-5f4595e5518b5600.js

framework-5f4595e5518b5600.js

38 ms

main-a054bbf31fb90f6a.js

main-a054bbf31fb90f6a.js

28 ms

_app-bd6d56054adc7bb0.js

_app-bd6d56054adc7bb0.js

28 ms

e8d1a852-a3e97be6fe32a40e.js

e8d1a852-a3e97be6fe32a40e.js

34 ms

503-cfba9f81494de836.js

503-cfba9f81494de836.js

42 ms

365-6188a584c3ece4d0.js

365-6188a584c3ece4d0.js

52 ms

207-74413c88d62215ec.js

207-74413c88d62215ec.js

40 ms

index-21fdbfd209657fa1.js

index-21fdbfd209657fa1.js

48 ms

_buildManifest.js

_buildManifest.js

47 ms

_ssgManifest.js

_ssgManifest.js

51 ms

_middlewareManifest.js

_middlewareManifest.js

51 ms

owllink.svg

owllink.svg

79 ms

why-owl-link-bitcoin.svg

why-owl-link-bitcoin.svg

76 ms

why-owl-link-nfts.svg

why-owl-link-nfts.svg

78 ms

why-owl-link-logo-owl-link.svg

why-owl-link-logo-owl-link.svg

87 ms

css2

css2

41 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmWUlvAw.ttf

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmWUlvAw.ttf

56 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmYUtvAw.ttf

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmYUtvAw.ttf

65 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9vAw.ttf

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9vAw.ttf

70 ms

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Me5Q.ttf

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Me5Q.ttf

75 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmSU5vAw.ttf

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmSU5vAw.ttf

76 ms

KFOkCnqEu92Fr1MmgWxP.ttf

KFOkCnqEu92Fr1MmgWxP.ttf

75 ms

Accessibility Review

owl.link accessibility score

93

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

owl.link best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

owl.link SEO score

85

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

High

robots.txt is not valid

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Owl.link can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Owl.link main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

owl.link

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Owl. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: