Tools & Wizards About Us
ozog.pl screenshot

Report Summary

  • 52

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    70% of other websites

  • 92

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 80% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    36% of websites

  • 92

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    75% of websites

ozog.pl

Page Load Speed

2.9 sec in total

First Response

539 ms

Resources Loaded

2.2 sec

Page Rendered

130 ms

ozog.pl screenshot

About Website

Welcome to ozog.pl homepage info - get ready to check Ozog best content right away, or after learning these important things about ozog.pl

Visit ozog.pl

Key Findings

We analyzed Ozog.pl page load time and found that the first response time was 539 ms and then it took 2.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 45% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

ozog.pl performance score

52

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value5.0 s

10/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value10.0 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value9.3 s

13/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value60 ms

100/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.027

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value8.1 s

42/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

ozog.pl

539 ms

645 ms

style.css

225 ms

cnss.css

240 ms

front.css

242 ms

Our browser made a total of 41 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 95% of them (39 requests) were addressed to the original Ozog.pl, 5% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (692 ms) belongs to the original domain Ozog.pl.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 224.9 kB (52%)

Content Size

432.7 kB

After Optimization

207.8 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Ozog.pl main page is 432.7 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 20% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 213.8 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-76%

Potential reduce by 15.8 kB

  • Original 20.7 kB
  • After minification 19.0 kB
  • After compression 4.9 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 15.8 kB or 76% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-11%

Potential reduce by 13.4 kB

  • Original 121.3 kB
  • After minification 107.9 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Ozog needs image optimization as it can save up to 13.4 kB or 11% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-61%

Potential reduce by 131.1 kB

  • Original 213.8 kB
  • After minification 211.4 kB
  • After compression 82.7 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 131.1 kB or 61% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-84%

Potential reduce by 64.6 kB

  • Original 76.8 kB
  • After minification 55.6 kB
  • After compression 12.3 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Ozog.pl needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 64.6 kB or 84% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 18 (46%)

Requests Now

39

After Optimization

21

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 39 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Ozog. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 13 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 7 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

ozog.pl

ozog.pl

539 ms

645 ms

style.css

style.css

225 ms

cnss.css

cnss.css

240 ms

front.css

front.css

242 ms

styles.css

styles.css

242 ms

upw-theme-standard.min.css

upw-theme-standard.min.css

243 ms

jquery.js

jquery.js

370 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

338 ms

cnss.js

cnss.js

353 ms

itro-scripts.js

itro-scripts.js

355 ms

soliloquy.css

soliloquy.css

273 ms

style.css

style.css

274 ms

jquery.ui.core.min.js

jquery.ui.core.min.js

372 ms

jquery.ui.widget.min.js

jquery.ui.widget.min.js

388 ms

jquery.ui.mouse.min.js

jquery.ui.mouse.min.js

389 ms

jquery.ui.sortable.min.js

jquery.ui.sortable.min.js

391 ms

comment-reply.min.js

comment-reply.min.js

393 ms

jquery.form.min.js

jquery.form.min.js

401 ms

scripts.js

scripts.js

490 ms

soliloquy.js

soliloquy.js

507 ms

ga.js

ga.js

12 ms

1377775253_linkedin.png

1377775253_linkedin.png

221 ms

1377775374_googleplus.png

1377775374_googleplus.png

221 ms

logo_en.png

logo_en.png

346 ms

ozog_front.jpg

ozog_front.jpg

517 ms

small2.png

small2.png

507 ms

small.jpg

small.jpg

375 ms

header-arrow.png

header-arrow.png

353 ms

newsletter_icon.png

newsletter_icon.png

352 ms

__utm.gif

__utm.gif

67 ms

preloader.gif

preloader.gif

430 ms

left.png

left.png

444 ms

right.png

right.png

444 ms

circle.png

circle.png

458 ms

circle-hover.png

circle-hover.png

602 ms

pause.png

pause.png

692 ms

play.png

play.png

681 ms

video.png

video.png

676 ms

slider-arrows-horizontal.png

slider-arrows-horizontal.png

602 ms

slider-dots.png

slider-dots.png

602 ms

Accessibility Review

ozog.pl accessibility score

92

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

ozog.pl best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

ozog.pl SEO score

92

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    N/A

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Ozog.pl can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else), while the claimed language is English. Our system also found out that Ozog.pl main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

ozog.pl

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Ozog. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: