2.4 sec in total
408 ms
1.7 sec
315 ms
Visit res.oxfordjournals.org now to see the best up-to-date Res Oxfordjournals content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about res.oxfordjournals.org
Visit res.oxfordjournals.orgWe analyzed Res.oxfordjournals.org page load time and found that the first response time was 408 ms and then it took 2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 40% of websites can load faster.
res.oxfordjournals.org performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value1.4 s
96/100
10%
Value11.6 s
0/100
25%
Value10.1 s
9/100
10%
Value1,700 ms
11/100
30%
Value0.499
16/100
15%
Value13.8 s
10/100
10%
408 ms
93 ms
166 ms
167 ms
144 ms
Our browser made a total of 62 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 63% of them (39 requests) were addressed to the original Res.oxfordjournals.org, 11% (7 requests) were made to Oxfordjournals.org and 5% (3 requests) were made to Oasc-eu1.247realmedia.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (846 ms) relates to the external source Oxfordjournals.org.
Page size can be reduced by 265.3 kB (66%)
402.6 kB
137.4 kB
In fact, the total size of Res.oxfordjournals.org main page is 402.6 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 35% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 214.2 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 22.0 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 4.6 kB, which is 16% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 22.0 kB or 77% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 3.1 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Res Oxfordjournals images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 165.8 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 165.8 kB or 77% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 74.4 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Res.oxfordjournals.org needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 74.4 kB or 87% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 39 (64%)
61
22
The browser has sent 61 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Res Oxfordjournals. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 11 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 9 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
res.oxfordjournals.org
408 ms
main.css
93 ms
homepage.css
166 ms
journal.css
167 ms
revesj_h20.css
144 ms
hw-preview-mode.css
146 ms
jcarousel-skin.css
162 ms
main.js
178 ms
jquery-1.4.2.min.js
313 ms
jquery.jcarousel.min.js
235 ms
jquery.jcarousel.local.js
255 ms
oup_ad_size.js
257 ms
jquery.fancybox-1.3.4_1.css
8 ms
jobboard_widget.css
281 ms
jobboard_widget.js
290 ms
oup.cookiepolicy.pack.js
11 ms
caturls.js
815 ms
cover.gif
241 ms
cover.gif
237 ms
cover.gif
213 ms
cover.gif
298 ms
cover.gif
331 ms
cover.gif
253 ms
cover.gif
230 ms
oj_logo.gif
466 ms
contact_us.gif
453 ms
my_basket.gif
457 ms
my_account.gif
464 ms
revesj_header.jpg
516 ms
revesj_title.jpg
515 ms
nav_separator_dark_grey.gif
555 ms
about_this_journal.gif
550 ms
contact_this_journal.gif
559 ms
subscriptions.gif
554 ms
current_issue.gif
606 ms
archive.gif
608 ms
search.gif
637 ms
arrow_black.gif
640 ms
read_this_journal.gif
645 ms
278.cover.gif
657 ms
search_this_journal.gif
695 ms
go.gif
694 ms
reader_services.gif
725 ms
border_dotted_grey_horiz.gif
732 ms
the_journal.gif
733 ms
for_authors.gif
745 ms
oxford_open_small.gif
765 ms
rcukbanner.jpg
784 ms
journals-career-network.png
838 ms
oup-logo.png
846 ms
alerting_services.gif
752 ms
corporate_services_143.gif
742 ms
footer_ouptext.gif
771 ms
border_dotted_white_horiz.gif
780 ms
jquery-1.11.3.min.js
45 ms
1.js
249 ms
01-01-2000
192 ms
implied
97 ms
@Top
87 ms
JCN_search-a-job.gif
82 ms
85 ms
print.css
92 ms
res.oxfordjournals.org accessibility score
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
res.oxfordjournals.org SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
N/A
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Res.oxfordjournals.org can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else), while the claimed language is English. Our system also found out that Res.oxfordjournals.org main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
res.oxfordjournals.org
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Res Oxfordjournals. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: