3.3 sec in total
39 ms
3 sec
302 ms
Visit blog.processmaker.com now to see the best up-to-date Blog Processmaker content for India and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about blog.processmaker.com
BPMN 2.0, Workflow Automation, and More
Visit blog.processmaker.comWe analyzed Blog.processmaker.com page load time and found that the first response time was 39 ms and then it took 3.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 55% of websites can load faster.
blog.processmaker.com performance score
39 ms
750 ms
27 ms
264 ms
134 ms
Our browser made a total of 53 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 2% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Blog.processmaker.com, 70% (37 requests) were made to Processmakerblog.com and 8% (4 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1 sec) relates to the external source I0.wp.com.
Page size can be reduced by 468.1 kB (65%)
717.3 kB
249.2 kB
In fact, the total size of Blog.processmaker.com main page is 717.3 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 30% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 300.1 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 38.2 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 6.3 kB, which is 14% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 38.2 kB or 82% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 3.3 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Blog Processmaker images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 190.2 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 190.2 kB or 63% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 236.3 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Blog.processmaker.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 236.3 kB or 82% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 39 (85%)
46
7
The browser has sent 46 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Blog Processmaker. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 20 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 16 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
blog.processmaker.com
39 ms
processmakerblog.com
750 ms
css
27 ms
processmakerblog.com
264 ms
stag-shortcodes.css
134 ms
font-awesome.css
145 ms
pagenavi-css.css
150 ms
css
73 ms
bootstrap.min.css
203 ms
flaticon.css
168 ms
font-awesome.min.css
200 ms
nprogress.css
199 ms
mediaelementplayer.css
218 ms
style.css
254 ms
header-white.css
257 ms
blog_style2.css
259 ms
peter-river.css
271 ms
jetpack.css
304 ms
jquery.js
353 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
321 ms
visitor.gif
151 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
283 ms
emberjs.png
1006 ms
logo_PM_blog.png
270 ms
core.min.js
317 ms
widget.min.js
344 ms
accordion.min.js
344 ms
tabs.min.js
344 ms
stag-shortcode-scripts.js
345 ms
photon.js
418 ms
devicepx-jetpack.js
13 ms
bootstrap.min.js
378 ms
mediaelement-and-player.min.js
425 ms
tweetie.min.js
422 ms
jquery.fitvids.js
421 ms
jquery.jscroll.js
421 ms
custom.js
468 ms
e-201611.js
9 ms
facebook.png
750 ms
twitter.png
748 ms
linkedin.png
747 ms
google.png
748 ms
youtube.png
748 ms
zhcz-_WihjSQC0oHJ9TCYC3USBnSvpkopQaUR-2r7iU.ttf
21 ms
IQHow_FEYlDC4Gzy_m8fcvEr6Hm6RMS0v1dtXsGir4g.ttf
32 ms
ga.js
62 ms
count.js
53 ms
GCfZZhEBktKQec0okJ7kUw.ttf
46 ms
YWbtYk2MoHeFgZxEOX7DnvesZW2xOQ-xsNqO47m55DA.ttf
48 ms
flaticon.woff
382 ms
__utm.gif
56 ms
count-data.js
295 ms
g.gif
6 ms
blog.processmaker.com SEO score
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Blog.processmaker.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Blog.processmaker.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
blog.processmaker.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Blog Processmaker. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: