969 ms in total
48 ms
343 ms
578 ms
Visit discussion.pdga.com now to see the best up-to-date Discussion PDGA content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about discussion.pdga.com
Official Forum of the Professional Disc Golf Association
Visit discussion.pdga.comWe analyzed Discussion.pdga.com page load time and found that the first response time was 48 ms and then it took 921 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 15% of websites can load faster.
discussion.pdga.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value1.9 s
87/100
10%
Value2.6 s
86/100
25%
Value1.9 s
100/100
10%
Value0 ms
100/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value1.9 s
100/100
10%
48 ms
149 ms
8 ms
11 ms
9 ms
Our browser made a total of 29 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 97% of them (28 requests) were addressed to the original Discussion.pdga.com, 3% (1 request) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (149 ms) belongs to the original domain Discussion.pdga.com.
Page size can be reduced by 148.9 kB (64%)
234.0 kB
85.1 kB
In fact, the total size of Discussion.pdga.com main page is 234.0 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 15% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 109.7 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 84.0 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 84.0 kB or 87% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 667 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Discussion PDGA images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 62.8 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 62.8 kB or 57% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 1.4 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Discussion.pdga.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 1.4 kB or 86% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 6 (22%)
27
21
The browser has sent 27 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Discussion PDGA. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 7 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
discussion.pdga.com
48 ms
149 ms
vbulletin_important.css
8 ms
yahoo-dom-event.js
11 ms
connection-min.js
9 ms
vbulletin_global.js
9 ms
vbulletin_menu.js
9 ms
vbulletin_md5.js
27 ms
vbulletin_read_marker.js
24 ms
logo.png
57 ms
navbits_start.gif
54 ms
collapse_tcat.gif
55 ms
forum_old_lock.gif
57 ms
icon1.gif
54 ms
lastpost.gif
55 ms
icon10.gif
55 ms
poll_posticon.gif
57 ms
icon14.gif
63 ms
icon6.gif
57 ms
icon3.gif
57 ms
icon4.gif
58 ms
icon7.gif
60 ms
collapse_thead.gif
57 ms
whos_online.gif
58 ms
stats.gif
58 ms
forum_new.gif
59 ms
forum_old.gif
60 ms
cron.php
60 ms
ga.js
27 ms
discussion.pdga.com accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
discussion.pdga.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
discussion.pdga.com SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
ISO-8859-1
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Discussion.pdga.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Discussion.pdga.com main page’s claimed encoding is iso-8859-1. Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.
discussion.pdga.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Discussion PDGA. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: