1.7 sec in total
156 ms
1.3 sec
240 ms
Welcome to packagingconsultancy.com homepage info - get ready to check Packaging Consultancy best content right away, or after learning these important things about packagingconsultancy.com
B2B marketplace for Packaging, Packaging Products, Packaging Machinery, Packaging Materials, Packaging Graphics & Labelling. Complete packaging Solutions. Find here related suppliers directory, trade ...
Visit packagingconsultancy.comWe analyzed Packagingconsultancy.com page load time and found that the first response time was 156 ms and then it took 1.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 30% of websites can load faster.
packagingconsultancy.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.8 s
55/100
10%
Value3.0 s
79/100
25%
Value6.7 s
36/100
10%
Value4,390 ms
1/100
30%
Value0.16
73/100
15%
Value13.6 s
11/100
10%
156 ms
55 ms
14 ms
112 ms
26 ms
Our browser made a total of 84 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 61% of them (51 requests) were addressed to the original Packagingconsultancy.com, 10% (8 requests) were made to Googleads.g.doubleclick.net and 6% (5 requests) were made to Pagead2.googlesyndication.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (761 ms) relates to the external source Feeds.feedburner.com.
Page size can be reduced by 56.5 kB (40%)
140.7 kB
84.2 kB
In fact, the total size of Packagingconsultancy.com main page is 140.7 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 35% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 49.3 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 31.1 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 4.7 kB, which is 12% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 31.1 kB or 82% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 602 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Packaging Consultancy images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 8.9 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 8.9 kB or 18% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 15.9 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Packagingconsultancy.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 15.9 kB or 81% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 39 (50%)
78
39
The browser has sent 78 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Packaging Consultancy. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 11 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
packagingconsultancy.com
156 ms
style.css
55 ms
brand
14 ms
default.css
112 ms
show_ads.js
26 ms
PackagingNews-GoogleNews
761 ms
eto_ofr_post_form_serve.js
75 ms
brand
19 ms
analytics.js
20 ms
enquiry.gif
78 ms
packaging.gif
78 ms
cor.gif
87 ms
line.gif
85 ms
cor1.gif
86 ms
line1.gif
88 ms
best1.gif
123 ms
addimage.jpg
125 ms
b2b.gif
181 ms
bar.gif
180 ms
products.gif
126 ms
arrow3.gif
181 ms
pharma.jpg
182 ms
zero.gif
182 ms
more.gif
182 ms
dot.jpg
197 ms
food.jpg
218 ms
cosmatic.jpg
233 ms
machine.gif
234 ms
material.gif
232 ms
lab.gif
232 ms
arrows.gif
253 ms
devleper.jpg
254 ms
automation.jpg
278 ms
dotline.gif
273 ms
search.jpg
257 ms
rifid.jpg
261 ms
international.jpg
289 ms
arr-b2b.gif
307 ms
line-b2b.gif
297 ms
packaging1.gif
302 ms
arrow1.gif
329 ms
why.gif
339 ms
dotline1.gif
334 ms
google_custom_search_watermark.gif
33 ms
how.gif
332 ms
collect
17 ms
collect
13 ms
ca-pub-1576525035954946.js
41 ms
zrt_lookup.html
45 ms
show_ads_impl.js
72 ms
arrow.gif
270 ms
use.gif
279 ms
click1.gif
302 ms
line2.gif
306 ms
bg.gif
298 ms
bg1.gif
303 ms
bgadd.gif
297 ms
bg-b2.gif
277 ms
bg2.gif
334 ms
ads
240 ms
orange-bg.gif
281 ms
osd.js
19 ms
blue.gif
272 ms
ads
295 ms
ads
197 ms
ads
246 ms
ads
205 ms
abg.js
18 ms
css
53 ms
m_js_controller.js
3 ms
favicon
67 ms
nessie_icon_thin_arrow_big_white.png
50 ms
s
42 ms
googlelogo_color_112x36dp.png
98 ms
x_button_blue2.png
12 ms
favicon
24 ms
fBnyGA8Aionz5086-mElmoOSPUuyQ1M9Un647_EjucU.js
9 ms
cJZKeOuBrn4kERxqtaUH3T8E0i7KZn-EPnyo3HZu7kw.woff
41 ms
buzzboost-pwrd.gif
18 ms
ads
261 ms
packaging1.gif
45 ms
eto_ofr_post_form_serve_inside.php
86 ms
bgf.gif
50 ms
favicon
54 ms
packagingconsultancy.com accessibility score
ARIA
These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
[aria-*] attributes do not match their roles
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Form elements do not have associated labels
Links do not have a discernible name
<object> elements do not have alternate text
Internationalization and localization
These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.
Impact
Issue
<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute
packagingconsultancy.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio
Serves images with low resolution
packagingconsultancy.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Document uses plugins
EN
N/A
N/A
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Packagingconsultancy.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Packagingconsultancy.com main page’s claimed encoding is . Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.
packagingconsultancy.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Packaging Consultancy. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: