Report Summary

  • 54

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    71% of other websites

  • 68

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 33% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    80% of websites

  • 84

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    52% of websites

packagingonline.co.uk

Challenge Packaging | Postal Packaging and Carboard Specialists in Sussex

Page Load Speed

3.2 sec in total

First Response

272 ms

Resources Loaded

2.5 sec

Page Rendered

418 ms

packagingonline.co.uk screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Packaging Online content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about packagingonline.co.uk

Bespoke packaging suppliers in Sussex – Packaging Online are stockists of eco-friendly storage boxes and packaging solutions.

Visit packagingonline.co.uk

Key Findings

We analyzed Packagingonline.co.uk page load time and found that the first response time was 272 ms and then it took 2.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 55% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

packagingonline.co.uk performance score

54

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.4 s

70/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value7.8 s

3/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value4.4 s

75/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value420 ms

65/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.008

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value7.7 s

45/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

packagingonline.co.uk

272 ms

www.challengepackaging.co.uk

871 ms

css

227 ms

js

318 ms

gtm.js

90 ms

Our browser made a total of 67 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 1% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Packagingonline.co.uk, 93% (62 requests) were made to Challengepackaging.co.uk and 3% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (871 ms) relates to the external source Challengepackaging.co.uk.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 94.8 kB (5%)

Content Size

1.8 MB

After Optimization

1.7 MB

In fact, the total size of Packagingonline.co.uk main page is 1.8 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 40% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.5 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-78%

Potential reduce by 80.1 kB

  • Original 102.3 kB
  • After minification 100.8 kB
  • After compression 22.1 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 80.1 kB or 78% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 14.0 kB

  • Original 1.5 MB
  • After minification 1.5 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Packaging Online images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 0 B

  • Original 97.9 kB
  • After minification 97.9 kB
  • After compression 97.9 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 665 B

  • Original 51.3 kB
  • After minification 51.3 kB
  • After compression 50.6 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Packagingonline.co.uk has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 5 (8%)

Requests Now

63

After Optimization

58

The browser has sent 63 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Packaging Online. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

packagingonline.co.uk accessibility score

68

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a valid value for its [lang] attribute.

Best Practices

packagingonline.co.uk best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

packagingonline.co.uk SEO score

84

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    X-

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Packagingonline.co.uk can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it does not match the claimed language. Our system also found out that Packagingonline.co.uk main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Packaging Online. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: