3.4 sec in total
1.3 sec
1.8 sec
289 ms
Welcome to pageproofer.com homepage info - get ready to check Pageproofer best content for United States right away, or after learning these important things about pageproofer.com
Collaborate, share feedback, request changes and report bugs right on your website during development and site reviews.
Visit pageproofer.comWe analyzed Pageproofer.com page load time and found that the first response time was 1.3 sec and then it took 2.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 40% of websites can load faster.
pageproofer.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.1 s
82/100
10%
Value3.3 s
69/100
25%
Value2.5 s
98/100
10%
Value1,240 ms
19/100
30%
Value0.132
81/100
15%
Value13.5 s
11/100
10%
1313 ms
32 ms
45 ms
56 ms
217 ms
Our browser made a total of 24 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 54% of them (13 requests) were addressed to the original Pageproofer.com, 25% (6 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 13% (3 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.3 sec) belongs to the original domain Pageproofer.com.
Page size can be reduced by 23.5 kB (14%)
172.7 kB
149.1 kB
In fact, the total size of Pageproofer.com main page is 172.7 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 20% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 141.5 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 8.4 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 8.4 kB or 69% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 14.0 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Pageproofer images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 34 B
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 1.1 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Pageproofer.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 1.1 kB or 60% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 8 (47%)
17
9
The browser has sent 17 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Pageproofer. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 6 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 4 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
pageproofer.com
1313 ms
css
32 ms
css
45 ms
css
56 ms
all.css
217 ms
modernizr-2.7.1.min.js
206 ms
jquery-1.10.2.min.js
355 ms
jquery.fitvids.js
142 ms
main.js
139 ms
home.js
144 ms
title-logo-new.png
93 ms
imac.png
83 ms
screencast-poster.jpg
210 ms
play.svg
84 ms
graded2.png
149 ms
integration-logos.png
147 ms
ga.js
26 ms
gk5FxslNkTTHtojXrkp-xONSK5BxN3NFS4EJkViHIqo.woff
49 ms
gk5FxslNkTTHtojXrkp-xF1YPouZEKgzpqZW9wN-3Ek.woff
50 ms
MTP_ySUJH_bn48VBG8sNSnhCUOGz7vYGh680lGh-uXM.woff
60 ms
k3k702ZOKiLJc3WVjuplzHhCUOGz7vYGh680lGh-uXM.woff
61 ms
cJZKeOuBrn4kERxqtaUH3T8E0i7KZn-EPnyo3HZu7kw.woff
72 ms
DXI1ORHCpsQm3Vp6mXoaTXhCUOGz7vYGh680lGh-uXM.woff
60 ms
__utm.gif
53 ms
pageproofer.com accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
pageproofer.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript
pageproofer.com SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
N/A
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Pageproofer.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Pageproofer.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
pageproofer.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Pageproofer. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: