Report Summary

  • 85

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    89% of other websites

  • 85

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 60% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    81% of websites

  • 100

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    95% of websites

pagertree.com

On-Call. Simplified. Intelligent alert routing for the DevOps team. | PagerTree

Page Load Speed

1.1 sec in total

First Response

63 ms

Resources Loaded

418 ms

Page Rendered

664 ms

pagertree.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to pagertree.com homepage info - get ready to check Pager Tree best content for United States right away, or after learning these important things about pagertree.com

PagerTree on-call incident management gives DevOps teams flexible schedules, escalations, & reliable notifications via email, SMS, voice, & smartphone app.

Visit pagertree.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Pagertree.com page load time and found that the first response time was 63 ms and then it took 1.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 20% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

pagertree.com performance score

85

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.0 s

85/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value3.8 s

54/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value2.0 s

99/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value70 ms

99/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.068

96/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value3.5 s

92/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

pagertree.com

63 ms

l22fjta1x252-1e67c9e7f66bcb2b55e16c106b5ac81bf5c0e03b.css

18 ms

css

38 ms

js

98 ms

kjk5nze8tj0eenxe.svg

55 ms

Our browser made a total of 20 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 65% of them (13 requests) were addressed to the original Pagertree.com, 15% (3 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 10% (2 requests) were made to Landen.imgix.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (238 ms) belongs to the original domain Pagertree.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 48.2 kB (28%)

Content Size

169.6 kB

After Optimization

121.4 kB

In fact, the total size of Pagertree.com main page is 169.6 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 30% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 116.0 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-73%

Potential reduce by 39.0 kB

  • Original 53.6 kB
  • After minification 53.6 kB
  • After compression 14.5 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 39.0 kB or 73% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-8%

Potential reduce by 9.2 kB

  • Original 116.0 kB
  • After minification 106.9 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Pager Tree images are well optimized though.

Requests Breakdown

We found no issues to fix!

Requests Now

16

After Optimization

16

The browser has sent 16 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Pager Tree. According to our analytics all requests are already optimized.

Accessibility Review

pagertree.com accessibility score

85

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Tables and lists

These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).

Best Practices

pagertree.com best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

SEO Factors

pagertree.com SEO score

100

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Pagertree.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Pagertree.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Pager Tree. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: