5.8 sec in total
34 ms
5.2 sec
518 ms
Welcome to paparazzi-proposals.com homepage info - get ready to check Paparazzi Proposals best content for United States right away, or after learning these important things about paparazzi-proposals.com
Capture the magic of your proposal
Visit paparazzi-proposals.comWe analyzed Paparazzi-proposals.com page load time and found that the first response time was 34 ms and then it took 5.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 75% of websites can load faster.
paparazzi-proposals.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value5.5 s
6/100
10%
Value17.7 s
0/100
25%
Value17.0 s
0/100
10%
Value1,510 ms
14/100
30%
Value0.758
6/100
15%
Value19.1 s
3/100
10%
34 ms
2780 ms
36 ms
35 ms
105 ms
Our browser made a total of 104 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 44% of them (46 requests) were addressed to the original Paparazzi-proposals.com, 27% (28 requests) were made to Maps.googleapis.com and 9% (9 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.8 sec) belongs to the original domain Paparazzi-proposals.com.
Page size can be reduced by 1.7 MB (38%)
4.5 MB
2.8 MB
In fact, the total size of Paparazzi-proposals.com main page is 4.5 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 80% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 2.3 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 173.0 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 173.0 kB or 80% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 147.9 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Paparazzi Proposals images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 1.0 MB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 1.0 MB or 68% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 394.2 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Paparazzi-proposals.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 394.2 kB or 87% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 51 (55%)
93
42
The browser has sent 93 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Paparazzi Proposals. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 37 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 6 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
www.paparazzi-proposals.com
34 ms
www.paparazzi-proposals.com
2780 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
36 ms
formidablepro.css
35 ms
css
105 ms
theme.min.css
66 ms
bootstrap-datepicker.min.css
51 ms
blueimp-gallery.min.css
96 ms
jquery.js
115 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
94 ms
loader.php
1096 ms
swap.js
59 ms
add-to-cart.min.js
98 ms
jquery.blockUI.min.js
143 ms
woocommerce.min.js
153 ms
jquery.cookie.min.js
154 ms
cart-fragments.min.js
158 ms
bootstrap-datepicker.min.js
159 ms
js
123 ms
bootstrap.min.js
207 ms
slick.min.js
207 ms
blueimp-gallery.min.js
205 ms
common.js
209 ms
wp-embed.min.js
212 ms
jquery.placeholder.js
213 ms
formidable.min.js
227 ms
count.js
236 ms
addthis_widget.js
90 ms
pp-logo-small.png
89 ms
Robert_Elizabeth-831-1600x952.jpg
90 ms
Dallas-Surprise-Proposal-Ideas-Phillip-1-480x480.jpg
91 ms
Miami-Proposal-Ideas-Elias-1-of-6-480x480.jpg
93 ms
Jason-Proposal-8-480x480.jpg
88 ms
New-York-City-Proposal-Ideas-Omar-1-480x480.jpg
91 ms
New-York-City-Surprise-Engagement-Photography-Stephen-1-480x480.jpg
438 ms
Chicago-Proposal-Ideas-Ryan-1-480x480.jpg
437 ms
New-York-City-Proposal-Ideas-Tim-1-480x480.jpg
438 ms
New-York-City-Proposal-Ideas-Eduard-1-480x480.jpg
194 ms
Miami-Proposal-Ideas-James-21-768x432.jpg
438 ms
Charles-93-768x432.jpg
195 ms
Guilherme-2-1-768x432.jpg
464 ms
Brenton-13-5-768x432.jpg
437 ms
Tim-4-XL-768x432.jpg
499 ms
David-Proposal-27-768x432.jpg
497 ms
Dhaval-Proposal-9-X3-768x432.jpg
496 ms
ajax_loader.gif
496 ms
web-design-and-development-by-hutchhouse.png
495 ms
1EqTbJWOZQBfhZ0e3RL9uvesZW2xOQ-xsNqO47m55DA.ttf
346 ms
0DeoTBMnW4sOpD0Zb8OQSALUuEpTyoUstqEm5AMlJo4.ttf
347 ms
5FbdueAKJ1eeO4CsvGhNRevvDin1pK8aKteLpeZ5c0A.ttf
406 ms
MZ1aViPqjfvZwVD_tzjjkwLUuEpTyoUstqEm5AMlJo4.ttf
407 ms
jZjuDZSb58pQtWhOr6q-6ALUuEpTyoUstqEm5AMlJo4.ttf
458 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
520 ms
common.js
364 ms
map.js
367 ms
util.js
417 ms
marker.js
366 ms
count.js
493 ms
300lo.json
419 ms
ajax-loader.gif
402 ms
slick.woff
401 ms
sh.8e5f85691f9aaa082472a194.html
293 ms
1f48d.png
422 ms
analytics.js
276 ms
infowindow.js
151 ms
onion.js
92 ms
openhand_8_8.cur
162 ms
ViewportInfoService.GetViewportInfo
156 ms
stats.js
78 ms
controls.js
60 ms
spotlight-poi.png
196 ms
layers.e5ea973510bf60b3db41.js
79 ms
css
120 ms
transparent.png
138 ms
linkid.js
95 ms
google4.png
121 ms
mapcnt6.png
122 ms
sv5.png
138 ms
tmapctrl.png
121 ms
tmapctrl4.png
122 ms
vt
52 ms
vt
35 ms
vt
35 ms
vt
51 ms
vt
33 ms
vt
51 ms
vt
51 ms
vt
50 ms
vt
63 ms
vt
64 ms
vt
65 ms
vt
66 ms
vt
63 ms
vt
65 ms
vt
72 ms
vt
73 ms
vt
73 ms
collect
23 ms
collect
79 ms
QHD8zigcbDB8aPfIoaupKOvvDin1pK8aKteLpeZ5c0A.ttf
11 ms
RxZJdnzeo3R5zSexge8UUSZ2oysoEQEeKwjgmXLRnTc.ttf
11 ms
Hgo13k-tfSpn0qi1SFdUfSZ2oysoEQEeKwjgmXLRnTc.ttf
11 ms
d-6IYplOFocCacKzxwXSOCZ2oysoEQEeKwjgmXLRnTc.ttf
11 ms
AuthenticationService.Authenticate
54 ms
paparazzi-proposals.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Form elements do not have associated labels
Tables and lists
These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
paparazzi-proposals.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
paparazzi-proposals.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Paparazzi-proposals.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Paparazzi-proposals.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
paparazzi-proposals.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Paparazzi Proposals. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: